Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T19:32:20.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Island Formation in Ge on Si Heteroepitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

D.J. Eaglesham
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Labs, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
H.-J. Gossmann
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Labs, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
M. Cerullo
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Labs, 600 Mountain Avenue, Murray Hill, NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

We present a study of island formation (the transition from 2D to 3D growth) during the Stranski-Krastanow (S-K) growth of Ge on Si. The energetic driving force for S-K island formation should be the ability to relax the islands by dislocation introduction. Here, we show that Ge islands formed on Si (100) are initially dislocation-free, in the presence of a 2D “sea” that is far in excess of the equilibrium 3 monolayers (ML). We call this phase of growth “dislocation-free S-K”. The 2-D sea does not collapse until dislocated islands are produced at an average coverage of = 7 ML. We call the dislocation-free island phase “coherent S-K” growth. The corresponding 2D-3D transition on Si (111) appears to reach equilibrium far faster, and we have not observed dislocation-free island formation: dislocated islands are seen at = 5 ML. As expected, the kinetics allow us to suppress island formation on (100) by reducing the growth temperature. These thick 2D films are analogous to those grown on As-covered surfaces, but have a microstructure dominated by edge dislocations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bauer, E., Z. Krystallogr., 110 372 (1958).10.1524/zkri.1958.110.1-6.372Google Scholar
[2] Frank, F.C. and Merwe, J.H. van der, Proc. Roy. Soc. A198, 205 (1949)Google Scholar
[3] Volmer, M. and Weber, A., Z. physik. Chem. 119, 277 (1926).Google Scholar
[4] Stranski, I.N. and Krastanow, Von L., Akad. Wiss. Mainz L. Math.-Nat. KI II b, 146 797 (1939).Google Scholar
[5] Bruinsma, R. and Zangwill, A., Europhys. Lett. 4, 729 (1987)10.1209/0295-5075/4/6/015Google Scholar
[6] , Zinke-Allmang et al. Google Scholar
[7] Copel, M., Reuter, M.C., Kaxiras, E, and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 632 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.632Google Scholar
[8] LeGoues, F.K., Copel, M., and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1826 (1989).10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.1826Google Scholar