Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T11:14:22.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Key Projections on Future PV Performance, Market Penetration and Costs, with Special Reference to CdTe and Other Thin Film Technologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Marco Raugei
Affiliation:
marco.raugei@ambienteitalia.it, Ambiente Italia, LCA, Via Vicenza 5a, Rome, N/A, Italy
Paolo Frankl
Affiliation:
paolo.frankl@iea.org, International Energy Agency, Paris, N/A, France
Get access

Abstract

The authors have drafted three alternative scenarios for the technological improvement and market penetration of photovoltaics in the next four decades, based on the preliminary results of the EU FP6 Integrated Project NEEDS, Research Stream 1a. The long-term diffusion of PV is foreseen to depend on the achievable module efficiencies and on the maturity of the different technologies in terms of their manufacturing costs, energy pay-back times, additional BOS costs, and even raw material reserves. Last but not least, the co-evolution of a suitable energy storage network (e.g. hydrogen) is also foreseen to be a mandatory requirement. Cumulative installed capacity worldwide is projected to reach 9,000 GWp in 2050 in the most optimistic scenario, which is reduced to 2,400 GWp in the intermediate scenario. In the third “pessimistic” scenario the current economic incentives are not assumed to be sustained long enough to allow PV to become competitive with bulk electricity, resulting in a stunted market growth (500 GWp in 2050). The resulting predictions in terms of costs range from 0.50 to 1.50 €/Wp in 2050, respectively corresponding to 2 - 8 €-cents per kWh in Southern Europe and 4 - 14 €-cents per kWh in Northern Europe. Within the framework of these three general scenarios, special attention is then put to the role that is likely to be played by thin film technologies, namely amorphous Si, CdTe and CIS/CIGS. These technologies are expected to collectively reach a market share of approximately 45% by as early as 2025 in all but the most pessimistic scenario, wherein the same goal is put off until 2050. Marked increases in module efficiencies and material and energy consumption are also expected, to varying degrees depending on the assumptions made in the three scenarios.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.EPIA, 2006. fiSolar Generation – Solar electricity for over one billion people and two million jobs by 2020fl. Greenpeace and European Photovoltaic Industry Association, The Netherlands / Belgium.Google Scholar
2. Wild-Scholten, M. de and Alsema, E. Environmental Life Cycle Inventory of Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Module Production Presented at Materials Research Society Fall 2005 Meeting, Boston, USA (2006)Google Scholar
3. Alsema, E. and Wild-Scholten, M. de, Environmental impacts of crystalline silicon photovoltaic module production. Presented at Materials Research Society Fall 2005 Meeting, Boston, USA (2006)Google Scholar
4. Fthenakis, V. and Kim, C. Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Life Cycle of Thin Film CdTe Photovoltaics. Presented at Materials Research Society Fall 2005 Meeting, Boston, USA (2006)Google Scholar
5. Fthenakis, V.M. and Alsema, E., Photovoltaics Energy Payback Times, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and External Costs: 2004-early 2005 Status, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 14:275-280 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Trancick, J.E. and Zweibel, K. Technology choice and the cost reduction potential of photovoltaics. 4th World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy Conversion, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA (2006)Google Scholar
7.NEDO, Overview of “PV Roadmap Toward 2030”. New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Kawasaki, Japan (2004)Google Scholar
8.Goetzberger, 2002. “Applied Solar Energy”. Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (FhG/ISE), Germany (2006)Google Scholar
9.IEA/OECD, Energy Technology Perspectives 2006. Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. IEA Publications, ParisGoogle Scholar
10.EREC, “Energy [r]evolution - A sustainable world energy outlook. Global energy scenario report”. Greenpeace and European Renewable Energy Council, The Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
11.PV-TRAC, A Vision for Photovoltaic Technology. Photovoltaic Technology Research Advisory Council (PV-TRAC), EC (2005)Google Scholar