Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:00:52.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Lidar Technology Role in Future Robotic and Manned Missions to Solar System Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Rosemary R. Baize ,
Farzin Amzajerdian ,
Robert Tolson ,
John Davidson ,
Richard W. Powell  and
Frank Peri
Rosemary R. Baize
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
Farzin Amzajerdian
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
Robert Tolson
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
John Davidson
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
Richard W. Powell
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
Frank Peri
Affiliation:
NASA Langley Research Center Hampton VA 23681
Get access

Abstract

Future planetary exploration missions will require safe and precision soft-landing to target scientifically interesting sites near hazardous terrain features, such as escarpments, craters, slopes, and rocks. Although the landing accuracy has steadily improved over time to approximately 35 km for the recent Mars Exploration Rovers due to better approach navigation, a drastically different guidance, navigation and control concept is required to meet future mission requirements. For example, future rovers will require better than 6 km landing accuracy for Mars and better than 1 km for the Moon plus 100 m maneuvering capability to avoid hazards. Laser Radar or Lidar technology can be the key to meeting these objectives since it can provide highresolution 3-D maps of the terrain, accurately measure ground proximity and velocity, and determine atmospheric pressure and wind velocity. These lidar capabilities can enable the landers of the future to identify the pre-selected landing zone and hazardous terrain features within it, determine the optimum flight path, having atmospheric pressure and winds data, and accurately navigate using precision ground proximity and velocity data. This paper examines the potential of lidar technology in future human and robotic missions to the Moon, Mars, and other planetary bodies. A guidance and navigation control architecture concept utilizing lidar sensors will be presented and its operation will be described. The performance and physical requirements of the lidar sensors will be also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 883: Symposium FF – Advanced Devices and Materials for Laser Remote Sensing , 2005 , FF8.3
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1MEPAG (2004), Scientific Goals, Objectives, Investigations, and Priorities: 2003. Unpublished document, http://mepag.jpl.nasa.gov/reports/index.html.Google Scholar
2 Space Studies Board, National Research Council, New Frontiers in the Solar System – An Integrated Exploration Strategy, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C., 2003.Google Scholar
3 Wolf, A., A., Jordan, F., Johnson, W., Graves, C., Powell, R., Cheng, Y., Andringa, J., ‘Near-Term, Low-Cost Demonstration of Pinpoint Landing Capability: A White Paper.’Google Scholar
4 Wong, E. C. and Masciarelli, J. P., “Autonomous Guidance and Control Design for Hazard Avoidance and Safe Landing on Mars”, AIAA 2002-4619.Google Scholar
5 Golombek, M. P., Cook, R. A., Economou, T., Folkner, W. M., Haldemann, A. F. C., Kallemeyn, P. H., Knudsen, J. M., Manning, R. M., Moore, H. J., Parker, T. J., Rieder, R., Schofield, J. T., Smith, P. H., and Vaughan, R. M., “Overview of the Mars Pathfinder Mission and Assessment of Landing Site Predictions,” Science, December 5, 1997; 278: 1743–1748.Google Scholar
6 Malin, M. C. and Edgett, K. S., “Sedimentary Rocks of Early Mars,” Science2000 December 8; 290:1927–1937.Google Scholar
7 Johnson, A. E., Klumpp, A. R., Collier, J. B., and Wolf, A. A., “Lidar-based Hazard Avoidance for Safe Landing on Mars.” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 25 No. 6, Nov.-Dec. 2002.Google Scholar
8 Sinclair, A. J. and Fitz-Coy, N. G, “Comparison of Obstacle Avoidance Strategies for Mars Landers.” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 40, No.3, May-June 2003.Google Scholar
9 Gaskell, R. W., “Automated Landmark Identification for Spacecraft Navigation”, presented at the AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Quebec City, Canada, August 2001.Google Scholar
10 Koch, G.J., Barnes, B.W., Petros, M., Beyon, J.Y., Amzajerdian, F., Yu, J., Davis, R.E., Ismail, S., Vay, S., Kavaya, M.J., Singh, U.N., “Coherent differential absorption lidar measurements of CO2,” Appl. Optics, vol. 43, pp 5092–5099, 2004.Google Scholar
11 Ingoldby, R. N., “Guidance and Control System Design of the Viking Planetary Lander.” AIAA 1977–1060.Google Scholar
12 Ploen, S. R., Kinney, C. E., and Seraji, H. “Determination Of Terminal Landing Footprint For On-Board Terrain Assessment And Intelligent Hazard Avoidance” AIAA 2003-5750, AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference and Exhibit, August 2003.Google Scholar
13 Klumpp, A. R., “A Manually Retargeted Automatic Landing System for the Lunar Module (LM),” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 5, February 1968.Google Scholar
14 Striepe, S. A., “Mars Smart Lander Simulations for Entry, Descent, and Landing.” AIAA 2002–4412.Google Scholar