Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T12:18:21.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Material Balance Modeling of End-Point Uniformity in Silicon Dioxide Plasma Etching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

J. J. Chamberst
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
K. Min
Affiliation:
Engineering Research Center for Advanced Electronic Materials Processing
J. R. Hauser
Affiliation:
Engineering Research Center for Advanced Electronic Materials Processing
G. N. Parsonst
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University Raleigh, North Carolina 27695
Get access

Abstract

As wafer diameters increase, monitor wafers become more costly for process characterization and real-time sensors become more attractive. Process-state sensors are generally easier to implement than direct wafer-state sensors, but process-state sensors are usually not thought to provide wafer-state analysis. Utilizing a process-state sensor, such as a mass spectrometer, for wafer-state information will result in new approaches for sensing, optimizing, and controlling integrated circuit fabrication processes. We used a two stage differentially pumped mass spectrometer system sampling directly from an electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) chamber to sense the process-state and monitor end-point during silicon dioxide etch. The end-point uniformity is characterized using mass spectroscopy and material balance modeling. Specifically, using CF4 and D2 etch gases, the partial pressure of CO-containing etch products decays near the endpoint, and the average initial slope is directly correlated with the uniformity determined from optical interferometry thickness measurements. Changing the ECR magnet geometry defines the etch uniformity, and the resulting CO+ end-point signal is sensed with the mass spectrometer. By analyzing the initial slope of the CO+ signal near the end-point, a correlation exists between uniformity and the mass spectrometry signal. A COF2 etch product material balance provides a concentration versus time end-point model which substantiates the correlation between the mass spectrometer signal and the etch uniformity. This model is valid for any sensor that detects a change in the COF2 concentration at the end-point.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Benson, T. E., Kamlet, L. I., Klimecky, P., and Terry, F. L., Journal of Electronic Materials 25, 955 (1996)Google Scholar
2 Economou, D., Aydil, E. S., and Barna, G., Solid State Technology 34, 107 (1991)Google Scholar
3 Maynard, H. L., Layadi, N., and Lee, J. T., J. Vac. Sci. Technol B 15, 109 (1997)Google Scholar
4 Vallon, S., Joubert, O., Vallier, L., Ferrieu, F., Drevillon, B., and Blayo, N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 15, 865 (1997)Google Scholar
5 Tepermeister, I., Conner, W. T., Alzaben, T., Barnard, H., Gehlert, K., and Scipione, D., Solid State Technology 39, 63 (1996)Google Scholar
6 Cecchi, J. L., Stevens, J. E., Jarecki, R. L. Jr, and Huang, Y. C., J. Vac. Sci. Technol B 9, 318 (1991)Google Scholar
7 Wan, Z., Liu, J., and Lamb, H. H., J. Vac. Sc. Technol. A 13, 2035 (1995)Google Scholar
8 Mozumder, P. K. and Barna, G. G., IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 7, 1 (1995)Google Scholar
9 Thomas, S. III, Chen, H. H., Hanish, C. K., Grizzle, J. W., and Pang, S. W., J. Vac. Sd. Technol. B 14, 2531 (1996)Google Scholar
10 Sung, K. and Pang, S. W., Jpn. J. Appl. Phy. 33, 7112 (1994)Google Scholar
11 Buie, M. J., Pender, J. T., Soniker, J., Brake, M. L., and Elta, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 1930 (1995)Google Scholar
12 Maynard, H. L., Reitman, E. A., Lee, J. T. C., and Ibbotson, D. E., J. Electrochem. Soc. 143, (2029 (1996)Google Scholar
13 Wolf, P. J., Masters Thesis, North Carolina State University (1996)Google Scholar
14 Chambers, J. J., Min, K., and Parsons, G. N., J. Vac. Sc. Technol. B, SubmittedGoogle Scholar
15 Tedder, L. L., Rubloff, G. W., Shareef, I., Anderle, M., Kim, D. H., and Parsons, G. N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 13, 1924 (1995)Google Scholar
16 Chowdhury, A. I., Read, W. W., Rubloff, G. W., Tedder, L. L., and Parsons, G. N., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15, 127 (1997)Google Scholar
17 Mozumder, P. K. and Barna, G. G., Technical Activity Report, Semiconductor Process and Design Center, Texas Instruments, Dallas, Texas, August (1991)Google Scholar