Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-11T12:55:02.977Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Modeling of Mid-Infrared Multi-Quantum Well Lasers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. D. Andreev*
Affiliation:
A. F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences, Polytechnicheskaya 26, St.-Petersburg 194021, Russia+7-812-247-1017; andreev@theory.ioffe.rssi.ru
Get access

Abstract

Threshold characteristics of mid-infrared MQW lasers have been studied theoretically. Auger recombination rates in strained quantum wells have been calculated in the framework of 8×8 Kane model taking account of spin-orbit interaction. It is demonstrated that the Auger coefficients of both CHCC and CHHS processes essentially depends on the QW parameters (strain, QW width, barrier bandgap), but have relatively weak (non-exponential) temperature dependence. It is shown that the laser characteristics can be improved for optimized laser structures, when the Auger rate is decreased.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Wang, C.A. and Choi, H.K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, 802 (1997)Google Scholar
2. Lane, B., Wu, D., Rybaltowski, A., Yi, H., Diaz, J., Razeghi, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70,443 (1997)Google Scholar
3. Garbuzov, D.Z., Martimelli, R.U., Menna, R.J., York, P.K., Lee, H., Narayan, S.Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 67, 1346 (1995)Google Scholar
4. Andreev, A.D., Zegrya, G.G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 70, 603 (1997)Google Scholar
5. Andreev, A.D., Zegrya, G.G. in “In-Plane Semiconductor Lasers: from Ultraviolet to Mid-Infrared”, ed. by Choi, H.K., Zory, P.S., Proceeding SPIE, 3001, 364376 (1997)Google Scholar
6. Hyberten, M.S., Kazarinov, R.F., Baraff, G.A., Akerman, D.A., Shtengel, G.E., in “Physics and Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices III”, ed. by Osinski, M., Chow, W., Proceedings SPIE, 2399, 132 (1995)Google Scholar
7. Aliev, G.N., Andreev, A.D., Coshug-Toates, O., Datsiev, R.M., Ivanov, S.V., Sorokin, S.V., Seisyan, R.P., J. Cryst. Growth, accepted for publication (1997)Google Scholar
8. Jin Wang, von Allmen, P., Leburton, J.-P, Linden, K.J., IEEE J. Quantum Electron., QE–31, 864 (1995)Google Scholar
9. Andreev, A.D., Zegrya, G.G., IEE Proc. Optoelectronics, 144, No 5 (1997)Google Scholar
10. Krijn, M.P.C.M., Semicond. Sci. Technol., 6, 27 (1991)Google Scholar
11. Andreev, A.D., Zegrya, G.G., Semiconductors, 31, 297 (1997)Google Scholar
12. Gelmont, B.L., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 75, 536 (1978) [Sov. Phys. JETP, 48, 268 (1978)]Google Scholar