Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:15:18.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nanoscale deformation of MEMS materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2011

A J Lockwood
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
A Padmanabhan
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
R J T Bunyan
Affiliation:
MEMS Division, QinetiQ, Malvern Technology Centre, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 3PS, UK
B J Inkson
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Materials, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 3JD, UK
Get access

Abstract

Using a novel in-situ TEM triboprobe holder, nanoscale structures formed from polysilicon MEMS materials have been loaded to characterise the failure mechanisms of reduced scale components. Nanobridges with cross-section dimensions much less than 1μm have been deformed using both single, high displacement indentation and low displacement cyclic fatigue. In both deformation modes, significant residual plastic deformation is measured, occurring and accumulating in the polysilicon. This can be seen as a gradual curvature along the entire crossbeam upon unloading. Where the radius of curvature is very high, fracture of the beams at the centre point was generally also seen. When loading at much lower displacement but under fatigue conditions, localised heating around the moving contact point initiates carbon migration, forming a very strong bond. A high tensile force was needed to severe the contact during unload. Such in-situ techniques demonstrate a range of time dependant failure modes which can be overlooked using post-mortem analysis. In particular, the combined effect of localised frictional heating and contamination on the reliability of components that repeatedly comes into contact with one another.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Haque, M and Saif, M. Experimental Mechanics, 2002. 42(1): p. 123128.Google Scholar
[2] Yi, T and Kim, C-J. Meas. Sci. Technol., 1999. 10: p. 706716.Google Scholar
[3] Muhlstein, C L, Stach, E A, and Ritchie, R O. Appl. Phys. Lett., 2002. 80(9): p. 15321534.Google Scholar
[4] Namazu, T, Isono, Y, and Tanaka, T. in Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 2000. MEMS 2000. The Thirteenth Annual International Conference on. 2000.Google Scholar
[5] Lockwood, A J, Wedekind, J, Gay, R S, Bobji, M S, Amavasai, B, Howarth, M, Möbus, G, and Inkson, B J. Meas. Sci. Technol., 2010. 21: p. 075901.Google Scholar
[6] Lockwood, A J, Bunyan, R J T, and Inkson, B J, In-situ TEM mechanical testing of a Si MEMS nanobridge, in EMC 2008, Instrumentation and Methods, Luysberg, K.T. M., Weirich, T., Editor. 2008, Springer-Verlag: Aachen, Germany. p. 495496.Google Scholar
[7] Minor, A M, Lilleodden, E T, Jin, M, Stach, E A, Chrzan, D C, and Morris, J W. Philosophical Magazine, 2005. 85(2-3): p. 323330.Google Scholar