Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T11:30:06.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Organic Semiconductors for Detection of Ionizing Radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Tiffany M.S. Wilson
Affiliation:
tmswils@sandia.gov, Sandia National Laboratories, Engineered Materials, 7011 East Avenue, MS 9671, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States, 925-294-6399, 925-294-1489
Douglas A. Chinn
Affiliation:
dachinn@sandia.gov, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 87185, United States
Michael J. King
Affiliation:
micking@sandia.gov, Sandia National Laboratories, Engineered Materials, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States
F. Patrick Doty
Affiliation:
fpdoty@sandia.gov, Sandia National Laboratories, Engineered Materials, Livermore, CA, 94550, United States
Get access

Abstract

Organic semiconductors are increasingly common in electronics and sensors, and are now under investigation for a novel type of radiation sensors at Sandia National Laboratories. This class of materials can offer wide band gaps, high resistivities, low dielectric constants, and high dielectric strengths, suggesting they may be suitable for solid-state particle counting detectors. A range of solution cast materials have been evaluated for this application, primarily in the family of poly(p-phenylene vinylene)s, or PPVs. The high ratio of hydrogen to carbon offers neutron sensitivity, while the low Z material provides some natural gamma discrimination. Compared to existing detectors, these materials could potentially offer large-scale radiation detection at a substantially reduced cost.

While PPVs hold promise for radiation detection, the mechanical and electrical properties must be optimized and the processing effects understood. Polymers can offer significantly simplified processing compared to the more common crystals used in solid state detection, which can be size limited and fragile. However, organic semiconductors are very sensitive to processing conditions, and mobility can be affected by orders of magnitude by processing variables, without altering any chemistry. Additives can also have dramatic effects on both electrical and mechanical properties. We report on nanoparticle additives that cause an increase in photoresponse of approximately three orders of magnitude as compared to a polymer film without additives. We separately show an order of magnitude increase in photoresponse by exposing the polymer/fullerene composite to sub-bandgap light.

Future work will analyze the feasibility of single particle detection and various geometries for optimization. Additional processing variables will also be investigated for further improvement of mobility and reduction of trap density.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Knoll, G. F., Radiation detection and measurement, Wiley, New York 2000.Google Scholar
[2] Brabec, C. J., Padinger, F., Sariciftci, N. S., Hummelen, J. C., Journal of Applied Physics 1999, 85, 6866.Google Scholar
[3] Sariciftci, N. S., Smilowitz, L., Heeger, A. J., Wudl, F., Science 1992, 258, 1474.Google Scholar
[4] Lee, C. H., Yu, G., Moses, D., Pakbaz, K., Zhang, C., Sariciftci, N. S., Heeger, A. J., Wudl, F., Physical Review B 1993, 48, 15425.10.1103/PhysRevB.48.15425Google Scholar
[5] Martens, T., Munters, T., Goris, L., D'Haen, J., Schouteden, K., D'Olieslaeger, M., Lutsen, L., Vanderzande, D., Geens, W., Poortmans, J., Schepper, L. De, Manca, J. V., Applied Physics a-Materials Science & Processing 2004, 79, 27.Google Scholar
[6] Singh, T. B., Gunes, S., Marjanovic, N., Sariciftci, N. S., Menon, R., Journal of Applied Physics 2005, 97.Google Scholar
[7] Yakimov, A. V., Savvate'ev, V. N., Davidov, D., Synthetic Metals 2000, 115, 51.10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00300-3Google Scholar
[8] Vanmaekelbergh, D., Hamstra, M. A., Pieterson, L. van, Journal of Physical Chemistry B 1998, 102, 7997.10.1021/jp981252dGoogle Scholar
[9] Kalem, S., Curtis, A., Hartmann, Q., Moser, B., Stillman, G., Physica Status Solidi B-Basic Research 2000, 221, 517.Google Scholar
[10] Szaro, L., Thin Solid Films 1985, 127, 257.Google Scholar
[11] Posch, P., Fink, R., Thelakkat, M., Schmidt, H. W., Acta Polymerica 1998, 49, 487.10.1002/(SICI)1521-4044(199809)49:9<487::AID-APOL487>3.0.CO;2-V3.0.CO;2-V>Google Scholar
[12] T. M. S. Wilson, Doty, F. P., Chinn, D. A., King, M. J., Simmons, B. A., SPIE Proceedings, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007, 670710.Google Scholar
[13] Rakhmanova, S. V., Conwell, E. M., Synthetic Metals 2001, 116, 389.10.1016/S0379-6779(00)00443-4Google Scholar