Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-wxhwt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T02:28:38.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phenolic Compounds Determination Using Enzyme Modified Clark Type Electrode

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2015

M. Stoytcheva
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
R. Zlatev
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
G. Montero
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
M.T. Beleño
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
B. Valdez
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
M. Schorr*
Affiliation:
Engineering Institute of the Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, Mexico
*
*Presenting author’s email: mschorr2000@yahoo.com
Get access

Abstract

Public health and environmental protection concerns provoked by phenolic compounds pollution impose the development of sensitive, rapid and cost effective methods for in situ phenols monitoring. Given that biosensors based techniques could face these challenges, a variety of such devices was suggested and applied for phenolic compounds quantification. Their majority are based on the polyphenol oxidase (PPO) catalyzed phenols oxidation to catechol and then, to quinones, coupled with the registration of the quinones reduction current. Nevertheless, quinoid products polymerization involving electrode passivation corrupts the biosensors operational stability. Thus, to avoid this drawback, in this work is proposed another approach for phenolic compounds quantification based on the electrochemical detection of the oxygen depletion during PPO catalyzed catechol oxidation using a Clark type electrode with a disposable active enzyme membrane. The oxygen probe was modified in comparison to the commercial ones: its flat front allowed ensuring a good contact with the active enzyme membrane and the gold multicathode uniformly dislocated on the surface of the flat front permitted eliminating O2 diffusional constraints. The active enzyme membrane was prepared by drop-coating of a mixture of PPO and gelatin onto a gelatin-saturated cellulose filter. A linear calibration graph for catechol determination was obtained in the range up to 0.7 mM with a slope of 0.902 μA/mM, at pH 6.5 and ambient temperature. The steady-state response to catechol of the biosensor was reached in 120 s. The biosensor had an excellent reproducibility (RSD<3%) due to the reliable enzyme immobilization technique, allowing the preparation of active enzyme membranes with identical characteristics. The proposed biosensor provided stable response and free of interferences measurements since the unique possible electrochemical reaction is O2 reduction. Another biosensor advantage is associated with the use of disposable prefabricated active enzyme membranes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Patnaik, P.. A Comprehensive Guide to The Hazardous Properties of Chemical Substances, (John Wiley & Sons, 2007) p.821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, J.J., Abraham, T.E., Abhijith, K.S., Kumar, P.V., Thakur, M.S., Biosens. Bioelectr. 1, 21 (2005).Google Scholar
Topping, D.C., Bernard, L.G., O’Donoghue, J.L., English, J.C.. Chem. Toxicology. 1, 45 (2007).Google Scholar
Pitarch, E. Medina, C., Portolés, T., López, FJ., Hernández, F.. Anal. Chim. Acta 2, 583 (2007).Google Scholar
Kovács, A., Kende, A., Mörtl, M., Volk, G., Rikker, T., Torkos, K.. J. Chromatogr. A.1, 1194 (2008).Google Scholar
Ye, X., Tao, LJ., Needham, L.L. and Calafat, A.M., Talanta 4, 76 (2008).Google Scholar
Wei, W., Yin, X.B. and He, X.W., Journal of Chromatography A 2, 1202 (2008).Google Scholar
Omuro, K., Rocha, F.R.P., Fatibello, O., Talanta 3, 62 (2004).Google Scholar
Kulys, J., Schmid, R.D., Analytical Letters 4, 23 (1990).Google Scholar
Kazandjian, R.Z., Klibanov, A.M., J. of the American Chemical Society. 19, 107 (1985).Google Scholar
Fan, Q., Shan, D., Xue, H., He, Y., Cosnier, S., Biosens. Bioelectron. 6, 22 (2007).Google Scholar
Zejli, H., Hidalgo, J.L., Naranjo, I., Liu, B., Temsamani, K.R., Anal. Chim. Acta 2, 612 (2008).Google Scholar
Kochana, J., Gala, A., Parczewski, A., Adamski, J., Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 4, 391 (2008).Google Scholar
Tsai, Y.C., Chiu, C.C., Sensors and Actuators, B: Chemical 1, 125 (2007).Google Scholar
Shan, D., Zhu, M., Han, E., Xue, H., Cosnier, S., Biosens. Bioelectron. 5, 23 (2007).Google Scholar
Teles, F.R.R., and Fonseca, L.P., Materials Science and Engineering C 8, 28 (2008).Google Scholar
Elkaoutit, M., Naranjo, I., Temsamani, K.R., Domínguez, M., J.L Hidalgo, , J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2, 45 (2008).Google Scholar
Yoshida, R. and Uesusuki, Y., Biomacromolecules 6, 6 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wael, K., De Belder, S., Van Vlierberghe, S., Van Steenberge, G., Dubruel, P., Talanta 5, 82 (2010).Google Scholar
Gupta, P., Vermani, K., Garg, S., Drug Discovery Today 10, 7 (2002).Google Scholar
Zlatev, R., 2002. Etudes sur les possibilités d’application de la bactérie Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans dans les méthodes électrochimiques d’analyse-biocapteurs et voltammétrie. Thesis work, LEPMI, INPG, France.Google Scholar
Zlatev, R., Magnin, JP., Ozil, P., Stoytcheva, M.. Biosens. Bioelectron. 21, 14931500 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zlatev, R., Magnin, JP., Ozil, P. and Stoytcheva, M.. Biosens. Bioelectron. 21, 15011506 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar