Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T21:31:09.513Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polymers for Optical-Communications Device Fabrication-Optical Adhesives and Polyimide Waveguides-

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

T. Maruno
T. Maruno*
Affiliation:
NTT Opto-electronics Laboratories, 3–9–11, Midori-cho, Musashino-shi, Tokyo 180, Japan, maruno@ilab.ntt.jp
Get access

Abstract

Two types of novel organic materials have been specifically developed for the fabrication of optical-communications systems devices. One is a UV-curable durable epoxy adhesive featuring refractive index controllability, low shrinkage during curing, and a low heat-expansion coefficient. These optically transparent adhesives are refractive index controllable between 1.45 and 1.59, and have been successfully applied to many optical devices that require return losses of more than 40 dB. The precision adhesives show an extremely low volume shrinkage of less than 2% during curing. The submicron positioning accuracy of these adhesives allows the fabrication of highperformance laser-diode modules and optical modulators. The other type of material is a fluorinated polyimide (F-PI) for optical waveguides; it features high optical transparency from visible to near-infrared and good heat resistance. Buried optical waveguides fabricated from F-PI operate in a single mode. They also exhibit a low loss of less than 0.3 dB/cm at the wavelength of 1.3 μm, and are heat and moisture resistant: the increase in optical loss is less than 5% after heating at 300°C for lh or after exposure to 85% relative humidity at 85°C for 24h.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 444: Symposium I – Materials for Mechanical and Optical Microsystems , 1996 , 27
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Iso, T., et al., ECOC-IOOC 91, Paper Web 6–1, pp. 97–100 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Minowa, J., Saruwatari, M., and Suzuki, N., IEEE J. Quantum Electron., QE-18, 705 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Mitomi, O., Kawano, K., and Ichihashi, Y., Rev. of the Electr. Commun. Labs, 33, 977 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Yamada, Y. and Kobayashi, M., J. Lightwave Tech., LT-5(12), 1716 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Maruno, T., Ishibashi, S., and Nakamura, K., IUPAC CHEMPAWN I., 11K08 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Murata, N., Nakamura, K., and Nara, S., Proc. of the 5th Int. Conf. on Plastics in Telecom., 6/1 (1989).Google Scholar
7. Maruno, T. and Nakamura, K., J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 42, 2141 (1991); T. Maruno and K. Nakamura, and N. Murata, Macromolecules, 29, 2006 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Nakamura, K., Murata, N., and Maruno, T., Rev. of Electr. Commun. Labs., 37, 127 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Murata, N. and Nakamura, K., Adhesion, J., 35, 251 (1991).Google Scholar
10. Matsuura, T., et al., Macromolecules, 26, 419 (1993); T. Matsuura, et al., Macromolecules, 27, 6665 (1994).Google Scholar
11. Matsuura, T., et al., Electron Lett., 29, 2107 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Maruno, T., Matsuura, T., Ando, S., and Sasaki, S., Nonlinear Optics, 15, 485 (1996).Google Scholar
13. Suzuki, M., Nakanishi, T., Tsuzuki, T., and Murata, N., IEEE 40th ECTC, 1, 200 (1990).Google Scholar
14. Suzuki, M., Nakanishi, T., and Murata, N., Trans. IEICE, E 72, 1048 (1989).Google Scholar
15. Maruno, T. and Nakamura, K., Kobunshi Ronbunshu, 48, 359 (1991).Google Scholar
16. Maruno, T. and Murata, N., J. Adhesion Sci. Technol., 9, 1343 (1995).Google Scholar
17. Booth, B. L., J. Lightwave Technol., LT–7, 1445 (1989).Google Scholar
18. Imamura, S., Yoshimura, R., and Izawa, T., Electron Lett., 27, 1342 (1991).Google Scholar
19. Christensen, D. A., Proc. Soc. Photo-opt. Instrum. Eng., 836, 359 (1987).Google Scholar
20. Usui, M., et al., Electron Lett., 30, 958 (1994).Google Scholar
21. Reuter, R., Franke, H., and Feger, C., Appl. Opt., 27, 4565 (1988).Google Scholar