Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-qf55q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T09:28:22.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Precipitation of Monodisperse Ceramic Particles; Theoretical Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Paul Calvert
Paul Calvert*
Affiliation:
University of Sussex, Brighton, BNl 9QJ, England. and Ceramics Processing Research Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

Monodisperse ceramic powders with sizes in the range of 0.1-μm have been prepared by a number of groups. Generally a dilute solution of a metal compound is hydrolysed to produce amorphous, spherical particles which may be crystallized by subsequent heat treatments. Emulsion polymerization can produce similarly monodisperse latices if the polymerization conditions are carefully controlled. This paper discusses models of the precipitation process which are based on crystallization from aqueous solutions but are believed to be more generally applicable. From simulations it is concluded that monodisperse particles are a most unlikely outcome of a batch precipitation process. Surface active compounds could play an important role in controlling particle size. Inhomogenous mixing during the early stages of reaction should also be important.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 73: Symposium H – Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II , 1986 , 79
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1) Fegley, B. and Barringer, E.A., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 32, 187 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2) Lichti, G., Gilbert, R.G. and Napper, D.H. in Emulsion Polymerization, edited by Piirma, I. (Academic Press, New York, 1982), pp. 94–145.Google Scholar
3) Hachisu, S. and Takano, K., Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 16, 233 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4) Pieranski, P., Contemp. Phys. 24, 25 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5) Matejevic, E., Acc.Chem.Res. 14, 22 (1981).Google Scholar
6) Stover, W., Fink, A. and Bohn, E., J.Colloid Interface Sci. 26, 62 (1968).Google Scholar
7) Prassas, M. and Hench, L.L. in Ultrastructures Processing of Ceramics. Glasses and Composites edited by Hench, L.L. and Ulrich, D.R., (Wiley, New York, 1984), p. 100.Google Scholar
8) Nahass, P., Wiseman, G.H., Sobon, C.A. and Bowen, H.K. (to be published).Google Scholar
9) Ugelstad, J., Mfutakamba, H.R., Mork, P.C., Ellingsen, T., Berge, A., Schmid, R., Holm, L., Jorgedal, A., Hamsen, F.K. and Nustad, K., J.Polymer Sci. Symposia, 72, 225 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10) Stanley, H.E., Family, F. and Gould, H., J. Polymer Sci Symposia, 73, 19 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar