Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T23:21:05.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reduction of Triangular Defects on 100mm 4° off-axis 4H-SiC using a Chloride Based CVD process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 May 2012

Hrishikesh Das*
Affiliation:
SemiSouth Laboratories, Inc. 201 Research Blvd., Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
Swapna Sunkari
Affiliation:
SemiSouth Laboratories, Inc. 201 Research Blvd., Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
Timothy Oldham
Affiliation:
SemiSouth Laboratories, Inc. 201 Research Blvd., Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
Josh Rodgers
Affiliation:
SemiSouth Laboratories, Inc. 201 Research Blvd., Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
Janna Casady
Affiliation:
SemiSouth Laboratories, Inc. 201 Research Blvd., Starkville, MS, 39759, USA
*
ahrishikesh.das@semisouth.com,
Get access

Abstract

Homoepitaxial layers were grown with very low surface roughness on 4", 4˚ off-axis substrates, but a new kind of large obtuse angled triangular defect that spanned 1000-2000 μm was observed. Process changes resulted in reduction of the size and concentration of these triangular defects from 3.5cm-2 to 0.13cm-2. Both large and small triangular defects were found to have a similar core structure. No degradation in the epitaxial morphology or quality was seen due to the process change. JBS diodes fabricated on wafers with large triangular defects had much higher leakage when the triangular defects were present in the active area of the diodes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ueda, T., Nishino, H., and Matsunami, H., J. Crys. Growth, Vol. 104, pp. 695 (1990)Google Scholar
2. Kimoto, T., and Matsunami, H., J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 75, pp. 850 (1994)Google Scholar
3. Powell, J.A, Petit, J.B., Edgar, J.H., Jenkins, I.G., Matus, L.G., Yang, J.W., Pirouz, P., Choyke, W.J., Clemen, L., and Yoganathan, M., Appl. Phys. Lett., Vol. 59, pp. 333 (1991)Google Scholar
4. Konstantinov, A.O., Hallin, C., Kordina, O., and Janzén, E., J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 80, pp. 5704 (1996)Google Scholar
5. Das, H., Melnychuk, G. and Koshka, Y., J. Crys. Growth, Vol. 312, pp. 19121919, 2010 Google Scholar
6. Shrivastava, A., Muzykov, P., Caldwell, J.D., and Sudarshan, T.S., J. Crys. Growth, Vol. 310, pp. 44434450 (2008)Google Scholar
7. Chung, G., Loboda, M.J., Zhang, J., Wan, J.W., Carlson, E.P., Toth, T.J., Stahlbush, R.E., Skowronski, M., Berechman, R., Sundaresan, S.G., and Singh, Ranbir, Mater. Sci. Forum Vols. 679680, pp. 123126 (2011)Google Scholar
8. Das, H., Sunkari, S., Oldham, T., Casady, J., and Casady, Jeff, presented at the 2011 ICSCRM, Invited Poster-3, Cleveland, OH, 2011 (to be published in Mater. Sci. Forum)Google Scholar