Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-t6hkb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:40:57.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between microstructure and elastic properties of semi-crystalline polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

F. Bédoui*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Matériaux (LIM – UMR CNRS), ENSAM Paris, 151 bd de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
J. Diani
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Matériaux (LIM – UMR CNRS), ENSAM Paris, 151 bd de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
G. Régnier
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Ingénierie des Matériaux (LIM – UMR CNRS), ENSAM Paris, 151 bd de l'Hôpital 75013, Paris, France.
*
*Corresponding author: E-mail address: fahmi.bedoui@paris.ensam.fr Phone: (33) 1 44 24 61 06, Fax: (33) 1 44 24 63 82
Get access

Abstract

Even though semi-crystalline polymers are closer to composite, even nano-composite material, little work has been done to predict their properties as in the case of composite or filled polymer. In their work Halpin and Kardos [1] proposed to determine the elastic modulus of semi-crystalline polymers. The lamellae are supposed to be like fibers. An adjustable parameter in this model was linked to the crystallite shape ratio. However, this model is well adapted for low volume fraction, which is not the case of semi-crystalline materials like Polypropylene (PP) and Polyethylene (PE). Other authors were interested in the evolution of the microstructure and large deformation of the semi-crystalline polymer using a new developed model [2]. The main ideas of the model were adapted by other authors to predict the elasto-visco-plastic behavior [3,4]. The predicted initial modulus variation of PE versus the crystalline fraction does not fit the experimental values. The aim of our work is to establish a relationship between the microstructure and elastic properties of the semicrystalline polymer. To fulfill this goal, experimental investigations of two kinds of polymers, Polypropylene and Polyethylene, are done. Micro-mechanical models are tested in order to choose which model is better adapted for these materials. A comparison of modeling and experiments will be presented.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Halpin J, C, Kardos, J L. J. Appl. Phys. 1972; 43:22352241.Google Scholar
2 Lee B, J, Argon A, S, Parks D, M, Ahzi, S, Bartczak, Z. Polymer 1993; 34:35553575.Google Scholar
3 Nikolov, S, Doghri, I, Pierard, O, Zealouk, L, Goldberg, A. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2002;50:22752302.Google Scholar
4 JAW, van Dommelen, DM, Parks, MC, Boyce, WAM, Brekelmans, FPT, Baaijens, J. Mech. Phys. Solids 2003;51:519541.Google Scholar
5 Bédoui, F, Diani, J, Régnier, G. Polymer 2004; 45: 24332442.Google Scholar
6 IM., Ward Structure and Properties of Oriented Polymer, Chapman & Hall 1997.Google Scholar
7 Tashiro, K, Kobayashi, M, Tadokora, H. Polymer 1996; 37:17751786.Google Scholar
8 Tashiro, K, Kobayashi, M, Tadokora, M. Polymer 1992; 24:899916.Google Scholar
9 Sawatari, C, Matsuo, M. Macromolecules 1986; 19:26532655.Google Scholar
10 CL, Choy, WP., Leung J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. Ed. 1985; 23:17591780.Google Scholar
11 Olley R, H, Basset D, C. Polymer 1982; 23: 17071710.Google Scholar
12 Eshelby J, D, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 1957; A; 376396.Google Scholar
13 Gilormini, P, Brechet, Y.. Mod. Sim. Mat. Sci. Eng. 1999; 17:805816.Google Scholar
14 Mori, T, Tanaka, K. Acta Metallurgica 1973; 21:571574.Google Scholar
15 Bornert, M, Bretheau, T, Gilormini, P. Homogénéisation en mécanique des matériaux Tome 1 Edition Hermes 2001.Google Scholar
16 Christensen, R. M. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1990; 38; 379404.Google Scholar