Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-24T11:31:47.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scenarios Selection for a Simple Concept Landfill

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Olivier-Moana Badie
Affiliation:
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire- DPRE/SERGD/LESTS 60-68 av. du Général Leclerc, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay Aux Roses Cedex Email:moana.badie@ipsn.fr
Frédéric Goldschmidt
Affiliation:
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire- DPRE/SERGD/LESTS 60-68 av. du Général Leclerc, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay Aux Roses Cedex
François Besnus
Affiliation:
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire- DPRE/SERGD/LESTS 60-68 av. du Général Leclerc, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay Aux Roses Cedex
Jean-Marc Péres
Affiliation:
Institut de Protection et de Sûreté Nucléaire- DPRE/SERGD/LESTS 60-68 av. du Général Leclerc, BP 6, 92265 Fontenay Aux Roses Cedex
Get access

Abstract

Scenarios are used to deal with uncertainty on the evolution of complex systems. The scenario selection methodologies also have to provide a basis for reflexion and traceability of the reasoning. In the case of a simple concept landfill, a methodology that fulfils these requirements has been developed. It distinguishes on the one hand the landfill evolution, and on the other hand, the human behavior evolution. It is based on three steps: (i) characterization of the landfill itself, in order to define situations leading to releases of radionuclides, (ii) characterization of the human behavior in order to define situations leading to intrusions, and (iii) characterization of the interfaces between the two subsystems, in order to identify situations which could lead to a radiological risk for man. The method has been applied to performance assessment for landfill of uranium mill tailings. It has led to one reference scenario, and five altered scenarios taking into account specific landfill evolutions such as loss of covering or loss of integrity of the dike, and human intrusions such as housing on the site of landfill or excavation of the site.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Goldschmidt, F., Doctrine en matière de réaménagement des stockages de résidus de traitement de minerai d'uranium, IPSN technical note DPRE/SERGD/ 99-42.Google Scholar
2. Badie, O.M. & al., Elaboration systématique de scénarios pour l'évaluation de la süreté des stockages de déchets radioactifs B et C en formation géologique profonde, IPSN/DPRE/SERGD 97/22, 1997.Google Scholar
3. d'Alessandro, M., Bonne, A., Radioactive Waste Disposal in a Plastic Clay Formation. A Site Specific Exercice of Probabilistic Assessment of Geological Containment, Harwood Academic Press, New York, 148 pp, 1981.Google Scholar
4. Cranwell, R.M. & al., Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: scenario selection procedure, NUREG/CR-1667, SAND80-1429, Sandia National Laboratories, 1990.Google Scholar
5. Skagius, H. & al., The use of interaction matrices for identification, structuring and ranking of FEPs in a repository system. Application on the far-field of the deep geological repository for spent fuel. SKB Technical Report 95–22, 1995.Google Scholar
6. Chapman, N.A & al., Systems analysis, scenario construction and consequence analysis definition for SITE-94, SKI report 95:26, 1995.Google Scholar