Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T18:41:25.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Shallow Boron Implant Activation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

A. T. Fiory
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill NJ 07974
K. K. Bourdelle
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies Inc., Orlando FL 32819
A. Agarwal
Affiliation:
Eaton Corp., Beverly MA 01915
H.-J. Gossmann
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill NJ 07974
C. S. Rafferty
Affiliation:
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies Inc., Murray Hill NJ 07974
Get access

Abstract

Boron was implanted into n-type Si at energies from 500 eV to 1 keV and doses near 1 E14 cm-2and 1E51 cm−2. Electrical activation was achieved by rapid thermal annealing (RTA) in nominally pure N−2and 0.1% 02 with the fastest available heating rates of up to 150 °C/s, cooling rates up to 80 °C/s, and included “spike” anneals with minimum dwell time at peak temperature. Measurements of sheet resistance, Hall coefficient, and secondary ion mass spectroscopy profiling were used to determine dopant activation and diffusion. Surface oxidation was studied by film thickness ellipsometry. Analyses of electrical transport measurements are used to relate junction depths to sheet resistance and their dependence on annealing temperature and time. For spike annealing, junction leakage and adequate activation limits the minimum practical temperature while diffusion limits the maximum practical temperature for formation of shallow junctions.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Saito, S., Shishiguchi, S., Mineji, A., and Matsuda, T., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 532, 3 (1998).Google Scholar
[2] Collart, E. J. H., Cock, G. de, Murrell, A. J., and Foad, M. A., Mat. Res. Soc. Proc. 525, 227 (1998).Google Scholar
[3] Agarwal, A., Eaglesham, D. J., Gossmann, H.-J., Pelaz, L., Herner, S. B., Jacobson, D. C., Haynes, T. E., and Simonton, R., Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 1, 17 (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Agarwal, A., Gossmann, H.-J., Eaglesham, D. J., Pelaz, L., Jacobson, D. C., Haynes, T. E., and Erokhin, Yu. E., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 3142 (1997).Google Scholar
[5] Fiory, A. T. and Bourdelle, K. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 (3 May 1998).Google Scholar
[6] Fair, R. B. and Tsai, J. C. C., J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1107 (1997).Google Scholar
[7] Fiory, A. T. and Bourdelle, K. K., J. Electron. Mater. (to be published).Google Scholar
[8] Camm, D., Vortek Industries, private communication.Google Scholar