Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T02:38:26.137Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Simfuel Leaching Studies in Granitic Groundwater Under Oxidizing Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

J. Garcia-Serrano
Affiliation:
CIEMAT-ITN. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid (Spain)
J. A. Serrano
Affiliation:
CIEMAT-ITN. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid (Spain)
P. P. Diaz-Arocas
Affiliation:
CIEMAT-ITN. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid (Spain)
J. Quiñones
Affiliation:
CIEMAT-ITN. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid (Spain)
J. L. R. Almazan
Affiliation:
CIEMAT-ITN. Avda. Complutense, 22. 28040 Madrid (Spain)
Get access

Abstract

Simulated high-bumup nuclear fuel (SIMFUEL) has been leached in synthetic groundwater under oxic conditions. SIMFUEL pellets were ground and sieved to two particle sizes (50–100 and 100–315 μm). An extensive solid characterization of the fragments was carried out by various techniques. Elemental analysis has also been performed prior to the leaching tests.

The release of U and the minor components (Mo, Ba and Sr) was monitored during the long term dissolution experiments (350 days). These minor components exhibit a trend similar to uranium, high release at the beginning followed by a plateau. The M/U calculated ratios show different behavior although after a period of time, depending on the particle sizes, constant ratios were observed.

SIMHUEL powder was used in order to simulate the physical effect of bum-up on the fuel structure. This fact seems to play an important role on the uranium release. A comparison with the results given in the literature for SIMFUEL pellet leaching tests shows good agreement with the values reported.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Thomas, G. F. and Till, G.. Nucl. Chem. Waste Manag. 5 (1984) 141 Google Scholar
[2] Johnson, L. H., Shoesmith, D. W., Lunansky, G. E., Bailey, M. G. and Tremaine, P.R.. Nucl. Tech. 56 (1982) 238 Google Scholar
[3] Lucuta, P. G, Verrall, R. A., Matzke, Hj., Palmer, B. J.. J. Nucl. Mater. 178 (1991) 48 Google Scholar
[4] Ollila, K., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R. C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc. 127, Pittsburgh, PA 1989) 337 Google Scholar
[5] Bruno, J., Casas, I., Cera, E., de Pablo, J., Giménez, J. and Torrero, M. E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII, edited by Murakami, T. and Ewing, R.C. (Mater. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc. 353, Pittsburgh, PA 1995) 601 Google Scholar
[6] Matzke, Hj.. J. Nucl. Mater. 190 (1992) 101 Google Scholar
[7] Casas, I., Sandino, A., Cececi, M. S., Bruno, J., Ollila, K.. SIMFUEL dissolution studies in granitic groundwater. SKB Technical Report 91-34Google Scholar
[8] Díaz-Arocas, P. P., Garcia-Serrano, J., Quiñones, J., Geckeis, H. and Grambow, B., paper presented at Migration 95, Saint Malo (France), to be published in Radiochimica Acta.Google Scholar
[9] Forsyth, R. S. and Werme, L. O., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management IX, edited by Werme, L. O. (Mater. Res. Soc. Sym. Proc. 50, Pittsburgh, PA 1986) 327 Google Scholar
[10] Forsyth, R. S., Werme, L. O. and Bruno, J.. J. Nucl. Mater. 138 (1986) 1 Google Scholar