Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T23:21:07.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Steady-State Structures in Composition-Modulated Alloys: Kinetic Phase Transition Between 1D and 2D Patterns

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

V. A. Shchukin
Affiliation:
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
A. N. Starodubtsev
Affiliation:
Ioffe Physical Technical Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
Get access

Abstract

A non-linear continuum theory of self-organized growth of composition-modulated structures in alloys is developed. It is shown that, for a lattice-matched alloy, where compositional and morphological instabilities are uncoupled in the linear regime, the two instabilities are coupled due to non-linear effects. Due to non-linear coupling, composition-induced stresses may lead to an instability of the advancing surface against undulations. A non-planar surface profile favors kinetic phase transition from the growth of a 1D modulated structure to the growth of a 2D one. A steady-state phase diagram in variables “temperature — growth velocity” is constructed which contains regions of homogeneous alloy growth, of 1D steady-state structures, of 2D steady-state structures, and the region where both 1D and 2D structures are possible. For zinc-blend semiconductors, the interplay between the anisotropic elasticity and anisotropic surface diffusion may lead to the kinetic phase transition between the growth of a 2D structure modulated in the elastically soft directions [100] and [010] to the growth of a 1D structure modulated in the direction of the fast diffusion [110]. Our theory explains this type of transition observed in the growth of InAlAs/InP.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[.Zunger, A. and Mahajan, S., in Handbook on Semiconductors, edited by T.S., Moss, vol.3, edited by Mahajan, S., (Elsivier, Amsterdam, 1994), p. 13991451.Google Scholar
[.Malyshkin, V.G. and Shchukin, V.A., Semiconductors 32, pp. 10621067 (1993).Google Scholar
[.Guyer, J.E. and Voorhees, P.W., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, pp. 40314034 (1995); Phys. Rev. B 54, pp. 1171011724 (1996).Google Scholar
[.Ipatova, I.P., Malyshkin, V.G., Maradudin, A.A., Shchukin, V.A., and Wallis, R.F., Proc. 23rd Int. Symp. on Compound Semiconductors, St. Petersburg, Russia, 1996 (American Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 155 pp. 617–620); Phys. Rev. B 57, pp. 1296812993 (1998).Google Scholar
[.Léonard, F. and Desai, R.C., Phys. Rev B 57, pp. 48054815 (1998).Google Scholar
[.Léonard, F. and Desai, R.C., Phys. Rev. B 55, pp. 99909998 (1997).Google Scholar
[.Shchukin, V.A. and Starodubtsev, A.N., to be published.Google Scholar
[.Shchukin, V.A., Ledentsov, N.N., Kop'ev, P.S., and Bimberg, D., Phts. Rev. Lett. 75, pp. 29682971 (1995).Google Scholar
[.Ueda, O., Fujii, T., Nakad, Y., Yamada, H., and Umebu, I., J. Cryst. Growth 95, pp. 3842 (1989).Google Scholar
[0.Jun, S.W., Seong, T.-Y., Lee, J.H., and Lee, B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 68 pp. 34433445 (1996).Google Scholar
[1.McDevitt, T.L., Mahajan, S., Laughlin, D.E., Bonner, W.A., and Keramidas, V.G., Phys. Rev. B 45, pp. 66146622 (1992).Google Scholar