Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-27T20:47:16.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Stress Analysis of Free-Standing Silicon Oxide Films Using Optical Interference

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2013

Imen Rezadad*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 32816
Javaneh Boroumand
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 32816
Evan Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 32816
Pedro Figueiredo
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 32816
Robert E. Peale
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, USA 32816
Get access

Abstract

We report a method for stress measurement and analysis in silicon oxide thin films using optical interference. Effects of design and fabrication on stress have been studied by fabricating submicron-thick slabs of oxide anchored at one end and extending over a reflective surface. Optical interference occurs between reflections from the surface and the oxide slab, giving rise to light and dark fringes that may be imaged with a microscope. Analysis of the interference pattern at different wavelengths gives the radius of curvature and means of stress mapping. The accuracy exceeds non-interferometric profilometry using optical or confocal microscopes, and it can be more quantitative than scanning electron microscopy. This nondestructive profilometry method can aid the stress optimization of silicon oxide or other transparent thin films to achieve specific mechanical characteristics in MEMS devices.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Reserbat-Plantey, A., Marty, L., Arcizet, O., Bendiab, N., Bouchiat, V., Nature Nanotechnology 7, 151 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NASA preferred reliability practices. GUIDELINE NO. GT-TE-2404, NASA Technical Memorandum 4322A, NASA Reliability Preferred Practices for Design and Test, (NASA Office of Safety and Mission Assurance, Washington, 1999).Google Scholar
Gottling, J. G. and Nicol, W. S., JOSA 56, 1227 (1966).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, E., Peng, G., Ding, X., Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 101117 (2008).10.1063/1.2895637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterjee, S., Opt. Eng. 42, 3235 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsai, C., Tien, K., Chen, M., Chang, K., Lin, M., Cheng, H., Lin, Y., Chang, H., Lin, H., Lin, C., Wu, C., Organic Electronics 11, 439 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, T. M. and Layton, R. A., Introductory MEMS: Fabrication and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boroumand Azad, J., Rezadad, I., Nath, J., Smith, E., Peale, R. E., Proc. SPIE 8682-80 (2013).Google Scholar
Stoney, G. G., Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A 82,172 (1909).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volinsky, A. A., Kravchenko, G., Waters, P., Reddy, J. D., Locke, C., Frewin, C., Saddow, S. E. in Residual Stress in CVD-grown 3C-SiC Films on Si Substrates,edited by Law, M., Pawlak, B. J., Pelaz, M. L., Suguro, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1069, 1065-D03-05, 2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar