Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:53:50.656Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal Conductivity of Thermal Interface Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Travis Z. Fullem
Affiliation:
fullem@binghamton.edu, Binghamton University, Materials Science Program and Department of Physics, Binghamton, NY, 13902, United States
Eric J. Cotts
Affiliation:
fullem@binghamton.edu, Binghamton University, Materials Science Program and Department of Physics, Binghamton, NY, 13902, United States
Get access

Abstract

While detailed theories exist for thermal conduction due to electrons and phonons in crystalline solids, phonon scattering and transmission at solid/solid interfaces is not as well understood. Steady increases in the power density of microelectronic devices have resulted in an increasing need in the electronics industry for an understanding of thermal conduction in multilayered structures. The materials of interest in this study consist of a polymer matrix in which small (on the order of microns to tens of microns) highly conductive filler particles (such as Ag or alumina) are suspended. These materials are used to form a thermal interface material bondline (a fifty to several hundred micron bonding layer) between a power device and a heat spreader. Such a bondline contains many polymer/filler interfaces. Using a micro Fourier apparatus, the thermal conductivities of such thermal interface material (TIM) bondlines of various thicknesses, ranging from fifty microns to several hundred microns, have been measured. The microstructure of these bondlines has been investigated using optical microscopy and acoustic microscopy. Measured values of thermal conductivity are compared to values for bulk samples, and considered in terms of microstructural features such as filler particle depleted regions. The influence of polymer/filler particle interfaces in the TIM bondline on phonon transport through the bondline is also considered.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Prasher, R., “Thermal Interface Materials: Historical Perspective, Status, and Future Directions”, Proc. IEEE, 94 (8), 1571 (2006).Google Scholar
2. Ronen, R., Mendelson, A., Lai, K., Lu, S. -L., Pollack, F. and Shen, J. P., “Coming Challenges in Microarchitecture and Architecture”, Proc. IEEE, 89 (3), 325 (2001).Google Scholar
3. Prasher, R. S., Shipley, J., Prstic, S., Koning, P. and Wang, J. –L., “Thermal Resistance of Particle Laden Polymeric Thermal Interface Materials”, ASME J. Heat Transfer, 125, 1170 (2003).Google Scholar
4. ASTM D 5470-06, “Standard Test Method for Thermal Transmission Properties of Thermally Conductive Electrical Insulation Materials”, ASTM International, (2006).Google Scholar
5. Putnam, S. A., Cahill, D. G., Ash, B. J. and Schadler, L. S., “High-precision thermal conductivity measurements as a probe of polymer/nanoparticle interfaces”, J. Appl. Phys., 94 (10), 6785 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Hasselman, D. P. H. and Johnson, L. F., “Effective thermal conductivity of composites with interfacial thermal barrier resistance”, J. Compos. Mater., 21, 508 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Davis, L. C. and Artz, B. E., “Thermal conductivity of metal-matrix composites”, J. Appl. Phys., 77 (10), 4954 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Hasselman, D. P. H., Donaldson, K. Y., Barlow, F. D., Elshabini, A. A., Schiroky, G. H., Yaskoff, J. P., and Dietz, R. L., “Interfacial Thermal Resistance and Temperature Dependence of Three Adhesives for Electronic Packaging”, IEEE Trans. Components and Packaging Tech., 23 (4), 633 (2000).Google Scholar