Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-2l2gl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T20:33:03.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

European Currency Union and the EMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Extract

The Delors report on monetary union in Europe has enlivened the debate on European monetary integration. We would argue that the debate has avoided one of the major issues it should be addressing. There has been very little discussion of the performance of a monetary union when there are external shocks. It is not obvious that a monetary union would cope better with external shocks than would the individual components of the union if they were free to respond. Both exchange-rate and monetary policies can be seen as shock absorbers. Their use can reflect the structural differences between economies, allowing both for differences in comparative advantage that arise from natural endowments such as oil reserves and for differences in wage and price behaviour which, although not immutable, may take some time to remove.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrell, R. and Gurney, A. (1989) ‘The World Economy’, Chapter 2 of National Institute Economic Review, No. 130. November 1989.Google Scholar
Delors, J. (1989) ‘Report on economic and monetary union in the European Community’, Committee for the Study of Economic and Monetary Union.Google Scholar
European Commission (1990) ‘Economic and monetary union: the economic rationale and design of the system’, Bank for International Settlements Review, No. 62, March.Google Scholar
Fleming, J.M. (1971) ‘On exchange rate unification’, Economic Journal, No. 18, September, pp. 467–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKinnon, R. (1963) ‘Optimal currency areas’, American Economic Review Vol. 53, pp. 717–24.Google Scholar
Mundell, R. (1961) ‘A theory of optimal currency areas’, American Economic Review, Vol. 51 pp 657–65.Google Scholar
Wren-Lewis, S., Westaway, P., Soteri, S., and Barrell, R., (1990) ‘Choosing the rate: an analysis of the optimum level of entry of sterling into the ERM’, National Institute Discussion Paper No. 171.Google Scholar