Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T23:28:45.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation Using Random Assignment Experiments: Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Earnings Supplements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Doug Tattrie  and
Reuben Ford
Reuben Ford
Affiliation:
Social Research and Demonstration Corporation, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The UK is preparing to start one of the largest random assignment evaluations of a new social policy that has ever been undertaken in Europe or North America. This juncture is a useful time to examine the merits of random assignment evaluation using new results from one-of the most widely cited experimental evaluations the Self-Sufficiency Project in Canada. Random assignment experiments are the most reliable approach to measure the impacts of changes in social policy. However, they are often expensive and cannot answer all relevant research questions. The Canadian Self-Sufficiency Project demonstrates these qualities. It showed that the provision of earnings supplements to lone parents who leave welfare for full-time work can increase employment and earnings and decrease welfare receipt. The high quality of research provides credible evidence that the large, initial programme expenditure can mostly be recovered through reduced welfare payments and higher taxes.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 186 , October 2003 , pp. 73 - 84
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Self Sufficiency Project was funded by Human Resources Development Canada.

References

Cook, T.D., Cook, F.L. and Mark, M.M. (1977), ‘Randomized and quasi-experimental designs in evaluation research: an introduction’, in Rutman, L (ed.), Evaluation Research Methods: A Basic Guide, Beverly Hills, SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Fisher, R.A. (1928), Statistical Methods for Research Workers, 2nd edition, London, Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Ford, R., Gyarmati, D., Foley, K. and Tattrie, D. with Jimenez, L. (2003), Can Work Incentives Pay for Themselves? Final Report on the Self-Sufficiency Project for Welfare Applicants, Ottawa, Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Greenberg, D. and Shroder, M. (1997), Digest of the Social Experi- ments, Washington, DC, The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J.J. and Smith, J.A. (1995), ‘Assessing the case for social experiments’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9, pp. 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lise, J., Seitz, S. and Smith, J. (2003), Equilibrium Policy Experiments and the Evaluation of Social Programmes, Ottawa, Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Michalopoulos, C., Tattrie, D., Miller, C., Robins, P.K., Morris, P., Gyarmati, D., Redcross, C., Foley, K. and Ford, R. (2002), Making Work Pay: Final Report on Long-Term Welfare Recipients in the Self-Sufficiency Project, Ottawa, Social Research and Demonstration Corporation.Google Scholar
Weiss, C.H. (1998), Evaluation, 2nd edition, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.Google ScholarPubMed
White, M. and Lakey, J. (1992), Restart Effect: Does Active Labour Market Policy Reduce Unemployment? London, Policy Studies Institute.Google Scholar