Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-30T09:04:45.770Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Aspects of the Monetary Debate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

M.J. Artis  and
A.R. Nobay
M.J. Artis
Affiliation:
National Institute
A.R. Nobay
Affiliation:
National Institute
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now ten years since the publication of the Radcliffe Report (Report of the Committee on the Working of the Monetary System (Cmnd 827)), and once again the role of monetary operations is in the forefront of discussion of macro-economic policy.

Type
Research Article
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 49 , August 1969 , pp. 33 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © 1969 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This article was prepared by M. J. Artis assisted by A. R. Nobay, both of the National Institute.

References

Almon, S., ‘The distributed lag between capital appropriations and expenditures’, Econometrica, Vol. 33, no. 1, January 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, L.C., and Jordan, J.L., ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stabilisation’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, Vol. 50, no. 11, November 1968.Google Scholar
Andersen, L.C., and Jordan, J.L., ‘Reply’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, Vol. 51, no. 4, April 1969.Google Scholar
Ando, A., and Modigliani, F., ‘Velocity and the investment multiplier’, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, no. 4, September 1965.Google Scholar
Ando, A. and Modigliani, F., ‘Rejoinder’, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, no. 4, September 1965.Google Scholar
Ball, R.J., ‘Some econometric analysis of the long-term rate of interest in the United Kingdom, 1921-61’, The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, Vol. XXXIII, no. 1, January 1965.Google Scholar
Balopoulos, E.T., ‘Fiscal policy models of the British economy’, North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam 1967.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.R., and Walters, A.A., ‘The stability of Keynesian and monetary multipliers in the United Kingdom’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLVIII, no. 4, November 1966.Google Scholar
Bell, G.L., and Berman, L.S., ‘Changes in the money supply in the United Kingdom 1954 to 1964’, Economica, New series, Vol. XXXIII, no. 130, May 1960.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J.M., ‘Friedman on the lag in effect of monetary policy’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXVIII, no. 6, December 1960.Google Scholar
Culbertson, J.M., ‘The lag in effect of monetary policy: Reply’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXIX, no. 5, October 1961.Google Scholar
Davis, R.G., ‘How much does money matter?’, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Monthly Review, June 1969.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, F., and Kalchbrenner, J., ‘Monetary and fiscal actions: a test of their relative importance in economic stablisation—Comment’, Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Review, Vol. 51, no. 4, April 1969.Google Scholar
Deprano, M., and Mayer, T., ‘Autonomous expenditures and money’, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, no. 4, September 1965.Google Scholar
Deprano, M., and Mayer, T., ‘Rejoinder’, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, no. 4, September 1965.Google Scholar
Economic Trends, no. 187, May 1969. ‘Money supply and domestic credit’.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘The demand for money: some theoretical and empirical results’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXVII, no. 4, August 1959.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘The lag in effect of monetary policy’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXIX, no. 5, October 1961.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., ‘The role of monetary policy’, American Economic Review, Vol. LVII, no. 1, May 1968.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Meiselman, D., ‘The relative stability of monetary velocity and the investment multiplier in the United States, 1897-1958’. Stabilisation policies, a series of research studies prepared for the Commission on Money and Credit (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1963).Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Meiselman, D., ‘Reply to Donald Hester’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLI, no. 4, November 1964.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and Meiselman, D., ‘Reply’, American Economic Review, Vol. LV, no. 4, September 1965.Google Scholar
Friedman, M., and Schwartz, A.J., ‘Money and business cycles’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLV, no. 1, part 2, Supplement : February 1963.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z., ‘Distributed lags : a survey’, Econometrica, Vol. 35, no. 1, January 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurley, J.G., ‘The Radcliffe Report and Evidence’, American Economic Review, Vol. L, no. 4, September 1960.Google Scholar
Hester, D.D., ‘Keynes and the quantity theory : a comment on the Friedman-Meiselman CMC paper’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLVI, no. 4, November 1964.Google Scholar
Hester, D.D., ‘Rejoinder’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XLVI, no. 4, November 1964.Google Scholar
Hopkin, W.A.B., and Godley, W.A.H., ‘An analysis of tax changes’, National Institute Economic Review no. 32, May 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaken, J., and Solow, R., ‘Lags in monetary policy’, Stabilisation policies, a series of research studies prepared for the Commission on Money and Credit, (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1963).Google Scholar
Latané, H.A., ‘Cash balances and the interest rate-a pragmatic approach’, Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. XXXVI, no. 4, November 1954.Google Scholar
Polak, J.J., ‘Monetary analysis of income formation and payments problems’, IMF Staff Papers, November 1967.Google Scholar
Polak, J.J., and Boissoneault, L., ‘Monetary analysis of income and imports and its statistical operation’, IMF Staff Papers, April 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shepherd, J.R., and Surrey, M.J.C., ‘The short-term effects of tax changes’, National Institute Economic Review no. 46, November 1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, D.K., ‘Changes in the money supply in the United Kingdom, 1954 to 1964 : A comment’, Economica, New Series, Vol. XXXV, no. 139, August 1968.Google Scholar
Walters, A.A., ‘The demand for money-the dynamic properties of the multiplier’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 75, no. 3, June 1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, W.H., ‘Interest inelasticity of investment demand : the case from business attitude surveys re-examined’, American Economic Review, Vol. 46, no. 4, September, 1956.Google Scholar