Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gvh9x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T05:45:59.198Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Analysis of Personal Taxation and Social Security

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

A.B. Atkinson ,
M.A. King  and
H. Sutherland
A.B. Atkinson
Affiliation:
International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics
M.A. King
Affiliation:
International Centre for Economics and Related Disciplines, London School of Economics
H. Sutherland
Affiliation:
University of Birmingham
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article describes research on the analysis of the consequences of changes in personal taxation and social security carried out as part of the SSRC Programme on Taxation, Incentives and the Distribution of Income. It shows how data from the Family Expenditure Survey can be used to see who gains and who loses from policy changes, illustrating this by an examination of proposals for a tax credit scheme. It discusses the incorporation of changes in behaviour, and the effect of taxes and benefits on incentives, including the ‘poverty trap’. Particular emphasis is placed on the accessibility of the analysis, and the last section describes a range of programs which are available for use on micro-computers.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 106 , November 1983 , pp. 63 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The work carried on by the SSRC Programme (directed by A. B. Atkinson, M. A. King and N. H. Stern) is described in its series of Discussion Papers, Research Notes and regular Newsletters. A full list of these is available from Anne Robinson, Room R442, London School of Economics. The authors would like to acknowledge helpful comments on the first draft of this paper from the Editorial Board of the Review, B. J. Buckingham of the Department of Employment, R. U. Redpath of the Office of Population Censuses and Surveys, J. Micklewright and N. H. Stern, and to express their thanks to B. Hayes and P. Ramsay for their advice and assistance with the design of computer programs.

References

Atkinson, A.B. (1983), ‘Newspaper coverage of the Budget-the effect of the March 1983 Budget on family incomes’, SSRC Programme, Research Note 4.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. (1983a), ‘Adjustments to the Family Expenditure Survey Data’, SSRC Programme, Research Note 7.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B., King, M.A. and Stern, N.H. (1983), Memorandum to the House of Commons Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Sub-Committee, House of Commons, 20–11, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Micklewright, J. (1981), ‘Unemployment and “replacement rates”’, SSRC Programme, Working Note on Unemployment 8.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Micklewright, J. (1983), ‘On the reliability of income data in the Family Expenditure Survey 1970-1977’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A. vol. 146.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Sutherland, H. (1983), ‘Hypothetical families in the DHSS Tax/Benefit Model and families in the Family Expenditure Survey 1980’, SSRC Programme, Research Note 1.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Sutherland, H. (1983a), ‘A tax credit scheme and families in work’, SSRC Programme, Discussion Paper 54.Google Scholar
Atkinson, A.B. and Sutherland, H. (1983b), ‘Analysis of reforms of the tax benefit system’. Memorandum to the House of Commons Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Sub-Committee, House of Commons, 20–11, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
CSO (1979), ‘Bias in the FES: some results’, unpublished.Google Scholar
Hausman, J.A. (1981), ‘Labour supply’ in Aaron, H. J. and Pechman, J. A. (eds.), How Taxes Affect Economic Behaviour, Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Kemsley, W.F.F. (1975), ‘Family Expenditure Survey: a study of differential response based on a comparison of the 1971 sample with the census’, Statistical News, November.Google Scholar
Kemsley, W.F.F., Redpath, R.U. and Holmes, M. (1980), Family Expenditure Survey Handbook, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
King, M.A. (1983), ‘Welfare analysis of tax reforms using household data’, Journal of Public Economic, vol. 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, M.A. (1983a), ‘Tax policy and family welfare’, SSRC Programme, Discussion Paper 52.Google Scholar
King, M.A. (1983b), ‘The distribution of gains and losses from changes in the tax treatment of housing’ in Feldstein, M. S. (ed.), Behavioural Simulation Methods in Tax Policy Analysis, Chicago University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
King, M.A. and Ramsay, P. (1983), ‘TRAP - Tax Reform Analysis Package’, SSRC Programme, Discussion Paper 35.Google Scholar
Morris, C.N. (1983), Memorandum to the House of Commons Treasury and Civil Service Committee, Sub-Committee, House of Commons, 20–11, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Stern, N.H. (1983), ‘The participation of women in paid work in the UK in the 1970s’, SSRC Programme, Discussion Paper 30.Google Scholar
Treasury and Civil Service Committee (1983), The Structure of Personal Income Taxation and Income Support, House of Commons, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Vince, P. (1983), Tax Credit—the Liberal Plan for Tax and Social Security, Women's Liberal Federation, London.Google Scholar