Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T21:17:29.433Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fiscal Sustainability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Ray Barrell  and
Simon Kirby
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The global financial crisis has had significant effects both on the prospects for output growth and projections for government borrowing and debt. We project that the UK government debt stock will rise to around 100 per cent of GDP and that output will be permanently scarred by around 4–5 per cent. The first is much more pessimistic than government projections, whilst the second is similar. In this note we explain a sequence of revisions we have made to our projections for trend growth as the crisis has unfolded, and also look at medium-term projections for the fiscal position. Not all of the deterioration in the budget has come from revisions to output, and not all of the changes to trend output result from the crisis, but the two are crucially linked.

Type
Articles
Information
National Institute Economic Review , Volume 208: Ten Years of EMU , April 2009 , pp. 61 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrell, R., Gottschalk, S., Kirby, S. and Orazgani, A. (2009), ‘Projections of migration inflows under alternative scenarios for the World Economy’, Department of Communities and Local Government economics paper No. 3.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Guillemineau, C. and Holland, D., (2007), ‘Decomposing growth in France, Germany and the UK using growth accounting and production function approaches’, National Institute Economic Review, January, pp. 99–113.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Holland, D., Liadze, I. and Pomerantz, O. (2008), ‘Volatility, growth and cycles’, Empirica, 36, pp.177–92.Google Scholar
-(2009), ‘EMU and its impact on growth and employment’, in Buti, M., Deroose, S., Gaspar, V. and Martins, J.N. (eds), EMU at 10.Google Scholar
Barrell, R., Hurst, A.I. and Kirby, S. (2009), ‘The macroeconomic implications of pension reform’, forthcoming in France, D. (ed.), Pension Reform, Fiscal Policy and Economic Performance, Bank of Italy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R., Hurst, A.I. and Mitchell, J. (2007), ‘Uncertainty bounds for cyclically adjusted budget balances’, in Larch, M. and Martins, L.N. (eds), Fiscal Indicators, Brussels, European Commission, pp. 187–206.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Kirby, S. (2008), ‘The budgetary implications of global shocks to cycles and trends in output’, ESRI Budget Outlook, October, Dublin, ESRI.Google Scholar
Weale, M.R. (2009), ‘Commentary: growth prospects and financial services’, National Institute Economic Review, 207, January, pp. 4–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar