Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-76ns8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:53:50.451Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Impact of European and Global Integration on the Mark-up of Prices Over Costs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Dawn Holland*
Affiliation:
National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Abstract

This paper develops a new approach for investigating the determinant of the mark-up of prices over costs. We estimate basic price equations around an expression for marginal cost that is derived from a cost minimisation problem, using a vector error correction approach to avoid endogeneity bias. Observed basic prices include the mark-up over marginal costs, and this mark-up is of interest to policymakers as an indicator of competition and ultimately as a determinant of the level of equilibrium employment. We look at the factors driving this mark-up, and in particular look at the role of EMU, as well as globalisation, the European Single Market and openness to trade and the introduction of the euro. We use a panel data set that includes both EMU and non-EMU members. The results indicate an important role for trade liberalisation in determining the mark-up, but openness itself and the introduction of the euro do not appear to have a significant role.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was financed in part by the European Commission, as part of a study on the impact of the euro on growth and employment. The results of this study are discussed in European Economy Economic Papers no. 318 (http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications). I would also like to thank Ray Barrell, Tatiana Fic and Martin Weale for comments and discussion during the preparation of this paper.

References

Allen, C., Gasiorek, M. and Smith, A. (1998), ‘The competition effects of the Single Market in Europe’, Economic Policy, 13(27), pp. 441–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, R.G.D. (1938), Mathematical Analysis for Economists, London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Arrow, K.J., Chenery, H.B., Minhas, B.S. and Solow, R.M. (1961), ‘Capital-labor substitution and economic efficiency’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 43, 3, pp. 225–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badinger, H. (2007), ‘Has the EU's Single Market Programme fostered competition? Testing for a decrease in mark-up ratios in EU industries’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), pp. 497519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, A. and Russell, B. (2004), ‘A reinvestigation of the markup and the business cycle’, Economic Modelling, 21, pp. 267–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R. and Fic, T. (2009), ‘Integration, globalisation, technology and trade patterns in the EU8’, NIESR mimeo.Google Scholar
Barrell, R. and Pain, N. (1997), ‘Foreign direct investment, technological change and economic growth within Europe’, The Economic Journal, 107, pp.1770–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrell, R., Liadze, I. and Pomerantz, O. (2007), ‘Import growth, globalisation and the impact of trade liberalisation’, NIESR Discussion Paper no. 294.Google Scholar
Bayoumi, T., Laxton, D. and Pesenti, P. (2004), ‘Benefits and spillovers of greater competition in Europe: a macroeconomic assessment’, ECB Working Paper No. 341.Google Scholar
Bils, M. (1987), ‘The cyclical behaviour of marginal cost and price’, American Economic Review, 77, pp. 838–85.Google Scholar
Blanchard, O. and Giavazzi, F. (2003), ‘Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), pp. 879907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, N. and Van Reenen, J. (2007), ‘Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(4), pp.1351–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christopoulou, R. and Vermeulen, P. (2008), ‘Markups in the Euro Area and the US over the period 1981-2004, a comparison of 50 sectors’, ECB Working Paper No. 856.Google Scholar
Duffy, J. and Papageorgiou, C. (2000), ‘A cross country empirical investigation of the aggregate production function specification’, Journal of Economic Growth, 5(1), pp. 87120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, R., Harrison, R. and Macartney, G. (2007), ‘Product market reforms, labour market institutions and unemployment’, The Economic Journal, 117, pp. C14266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. (1988), ‘The relation between price and marginal cost in US industry’, The Journal of Political Economy, 96(5), pp. 921–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haskel, J., Martin, C. and Small, I. (1995), ‘Price, marginal cost and the business cycle’, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansen, S. (1988), ‘Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors’, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12, pp. 231–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicoletti, G., and Scarpetta, S. (2003), ‘Regulation, productivity and growth: OECD evidence, ‘Economic Policy, 18(36), pp. 9- 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveira Martins, J. and Scarpetta, S. (1999), ‘The levels and cyclical behaviour of mark-ups across countries and market structures’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 213.Google Scholar
Oliveira Martins, J., Scarpetta, S. and Pilat, D. (1996), ‘Mark-up ratios in manufacturing industries: estimates for 14 OECD countries’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper No. 162.Google Scholar
Roeger, W. (1995), ‘Can imperfect competition explain the difference between primal and dual productivity measures? Estimates for US manufacturing’, Journal of Political Economy, 103, pp. 316–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotemberg, J. and Woodford, M. (1991), ‘Markups and the business cycle’, in Blanchard, O. and Fischer, S. (eds), NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Vol. 6, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauner-Leroy, J.B. (2003), ‘The impact of the implementation of the Single Market Programme on productive efficiency and on mark-ups in the European Union manufacturing industry’, European Economy, Economic Papers, No. 192.Google Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1957), ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39, 3, pp. 312- 20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar