Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T15:15:20.293Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

There Is No Silver Bullet: Investment and Growth in the G7

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2020

Chrys Dougherty
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin
Dale W. Jorgenson
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

This paper considers the relative importance of investment and productivity in the growth of the G7 countries during the period 1960-89. Investment is the commitment of resources in the expectation of future returns to the investor. Productivity is identified with 'spillovers' of benefits that do not provide incentives for investment. The great preponderance of growth in the US and Canada is due to investment. Investment is more important than productivity for all of the G7 countries, except France, after 1973. Patterns of economic growth have converged for the G7 countries, but important differences remain.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Financial support was provided by the Program on Technology and Economic Policy of Harvard University. Responsibility for any remaining deficiencies rests solely with the authors.

References

Abramovitz, M. (1956), ‘Resources and output trends in the United States since 1870’, American Economic Review, vol. 46, no. 2, May, pp. 523.Google Scholar
Abramovitz, M. (1986), ‘Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 46, no. 2, June, pp. 385406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baily, M.N., and Schultze, C.L. (1990), ‘The productivity of capital in a period of slower growth’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, vol. 1 pp. 369406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J., and Becker, G.S. (1989), ‘Fertility choice in a model of economic growth’, Econometrica, vol. 7, no. 2, March, pp. 481502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barro, R.J., and Sala-i-Martin, X. (1994), Economic Growth, New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J. (1986), ‘Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 5, December, pp. 10721085.Google Scholar
Baumol, W.J. (1994), ‘Multivariate growth patterns: contagion and common forces as possible sources of convergence’, in Baumol, W.J., Nelson, R.R., and Wolff, E.N., eds, Convergence of Productivity, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 6285.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1965), ‘A theory of the allocation of time’, Economic Journal, vol. 75, no. 296, September, pp. 493517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1993), Human Capital, 3rd ed, Chicago: University of Chicago Press (1st ed, 1964; 2nd ed, 1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G.S., and Barro, R.J. (1988), ‘A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 103, no. 1, February, pp. 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, E.R. (1991), The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary, Reading: Addison-WesleyGoogle Scholar
Bureau of Economic Analysis (1994), ‘A satellite account for research and development’, Survey of Current Business, vol. 74, no. 11, November 1994, pp. 3771.Google Scholar
Bureau of Economic Analysis (1995), ‘Preview of the comprehensive revision of the national income and product accounts: recognition of government investment and incorporation of a new methodology for calculating depreciation’, Survey of Current Business, vol. 75, no. 9, September 1995, pp. 3341.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (1983), Trends in Multifactor Productivity, Bulletin 2178 Washington : US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Bureau of Labor Statistics (1993), Labor Composition and US Productivity Growth, 1948-90, Bulletin 2426, Washington: US Department of Labor.Google Scholar
Christensen, L.R. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1969), ‘The measurement of US real capital input, 1929-1967’, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 15, no. 4, December, pp. 293320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L.R. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1970), ‘US real product and real factor input, 1929-1967’, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 16, no. 1, March, pp. 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, L.R. and Jorgenson, D.W. (1973), ‘Measuring economic performance in the private sector’, in Moss, M., ed, The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, pp. 233338.Google Scholar
Christensen, L.R., Cummings, D., and D.W Jorgenson (1981), ‘Relative productivity levels’, 1947-1973’, European Economic Review, vol. 16, no. 1, May, pp. 6194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1967), Why Growth Rates Differ, Washington : The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Denison, E.F. (1974), Accounting for United States Economic Growth, Washington: The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (1992), ‘A comparison of productivity and economic growth in the G-7 Countries’, doctoral dissertation, Harvard UniversityGoogle Scholar
Douglas, P.H. (1948), ‘Are there laws of production?American Economic Review, vol. 38, no. 1, March, pp. 141.Google Scholar
Englander, A.S., and Gurney, A. (1994), ‘OECD productivity growth: medium-term trends’, OECD Economic Studies, vol. 22, Spring, pp.111130.Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1906), The Nature of Capital and Income, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fraumeni, B.M. (1997), ‘The measurement of depreciation in the US national income and wealth accounts’, Survey of Current Business, vol. 77, no. 7, July, pp. 723.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M., Beckerman, W., Edelman, J., Marris, S., Stuvel, G., and Teichert, M. (1958), Comparative National Products and Price Levels, Paris: OEEC.Google Scholar
Gilbert, M., and Kravis, I.B. (1954), An Intentational Comparison of National Products and the Purchasing Power of Currencies, Paris: OEEC, 1954.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. (1955-6), A Study of Saving in the United States, 3 vols., Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, R. (1962), The National Wealth of the United States in the Postwar Period, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, R.J. (1990), The Measurement of Durable Goods Prices, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1960), ‘Measuring inputs in agriculture: a critical survey’, Journal of Farm Economics, vol. 40, no. 5, December, pp. 13981427.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1973), ‘Research expenditures and growth accounting’, in Williams, B.R. (ed), Science and Technology in Economics, London, MacMillan, pp. 5995.Google Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1992), ‘The search for R&D spillovers’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94, Supplement, pp. 2947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griliches, Z. (1995), ‘R&D and productivity: econometric results and measurement issues’, in Stoneman, P., ed, Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, Oxford: Basil Blackwell, pp. 5289.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E. (1991), Innovation and Growth, Cambridge : SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Grossman, G.M., and Helpman, E. (1994), ‘Endogenous innovation in the theory of growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 1, Winter, pp. 2344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, B.H. (1993), ‘Industrial research in the 1980s: did the rate of return fall?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, vol. 2, 1993, pp. 289331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R.E. (1971), ‘The measurement of quality change from vintage price data’, in Griliches, Z., ed, Price Indexes and Quality Change, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, pp. 240271.Google Scholar
Hall, R.E., and Jones, C.I. (1997), ‘Levels of economic activity across countries’, American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 2, May, pp. 173177.Google Scholar
Hall, R.E., and Jorgenson, D.W. (1967), ‘Tax policy and investment behavior’, American Economic Review, vol. 57, no. 3, June, pp. 391414.Google Scholar
Hall, R.E., and Jorgenson, D.W. (1969), ‘Tax policy and investment behavior: reply and further results’, American Economic Review, vol. 59, no. 3, June, pp. 388401.Google Scholar
Hall, R.E., and Jorgenson, D.W. (1971), ‘Applications of the theory of optimal capital accumulation’, in Fromm, G., ed, Tax Incentives and Capital Spending, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 960.Google Scholar
Hulten, C.R., and Wykoff, F.C. (1982), ‘The measurement of economic depreciation’, in Hulten, C. R., ed, Depreciation, Inflation and the Taxation of Income from Capital, pp. 81125.Google Scholar
Inter-Secretariat Working Group on National Accounts (1993), System of National Accounts 1993, New York: United Nations, pp. 379406.Google Scholar
Islam, N. (1995), ‘Growth empirics’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 110, no. 4, November, pp. 11271170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, N. (1997), ‘Convergence: variations in concept and empirical results’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1963), ‘Capital theory and investment behavior’, American Economic Review, vol. 53, no. 2, May, pp. 247259.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1966), ‘The embodiment hypothesisJournal of Political Economy, vol. 74, no. 1, February, pp. 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1967), ‘The theory of investment behavior’, in Ferber, R. (ed), The Determinants of Investment Behavior, New York, Columbia University Press, pp. 129–56.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1990), ‘Productivity and economic growth’, in Berndt, E.R. and Triplett, J., eds., Fifty Years of Economic Measurement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 19118.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W. (1996), ‘Empirical studies of depreciation’, Economic Inquiry vol. 34, no. 1, January, pp. 2442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., and Fraumeni, B.M. (1989), ‘The accumulation of human and nonhuman capital, 1948-1984’, in Lipsey, R.E. and Tice, H.S., eds, The Measurement of Saving, Investment, and Wealth, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 227282.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., and Fraumeni, B.M. (1992a), ‘Investment in education and US economic growth’, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 94, Supplement, pp. 5170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., and Fraumeni, B.M. (1992b), ‘The output of the education sector’, in Griliches, Z., ed, Output Measurement in the Services Sector, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 303338.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., EM Gollop, and Fraumeni, B.M. (1987), Productivity and US Economic Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., and Griliches, Z. (1967), ‘The explanation of productivity change’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 34, no. 99, July, pp. 249280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgenson, D.W., Ho, M.S., and Fraumeni, B.M. (1994), ‘The quality of the US work force, 1948-90’, Harvard University, Department of Economics.Google Scholar
Kravis, I.B., Heston, A., and Summers, R. (1978), International Comparisons of Real Product and Purchasing Power, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1961), Capital in the American Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznets, S. (1971), Economic Growth of Nations, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, L.J. (1996), ‘The sources of long-term economic growth: observations from the experience of developed and developing countries’, in Landau, R., Taylor, T., and Wright, G., eds, The Mosaic of Economic Growth, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 6391.Google Scholar
Levine, R., and Renelt, D. (1992), ‘A sensitivity analysis of cross- country regressions’, American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 4, September, pp. 942963.Google Scholar
Lucas, R.E. (1988), On the mechanics of economic development’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 22, no. 1, July, pp. 242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlup, E. (1962), The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1982), Phases of Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maddison, A. (1995), Monitoring the World Economy, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1995.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N.G., Romer, D., and Weil, D. (1992), ‘A contribution to the empirics of economic growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 107, no. 2, May, pp. 407437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling, Experience, and Earnings New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Nordhaus, WD, and Tobin, J. (1972), Is Growth Obsolete? New York : National Bureau of Economic Research; reprinted in Moss, M., ed, The Measurement of Economic and Social Performance, New York: Columbia University Press, 1973, pp. 509532.Google Scholar
Oecd (1987), Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditures, 1985, Paris : OECD.Google Scholar
Pieper, P.E. (1989), ‘Construction price statistics revisited’, in Jorgenson, D.W. and Landau, R., eds, Technology and Capital Formation, Cambridge: SAGE Publications, pp. 293330.Google Scholar
Pieper, P.E. (1990), ‘The measurement of construction prices: retrospect and prospect’, in Berndt, E.R. and Triplett, J., eds, Fifty Years of Economic Measurement, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 239268.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1986), ‘Increasing returns and long-run growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 5, October, pp. 10021037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1987) ‘Crazy explanations for the productivity slowdown’, in Stanley Fischer, ed, NBER Macroeconomics Annual, Cambridge : SAGE Publications, pp. 163201.Google Scholar
Romer, P. (1990), ‘Endogenous technological change’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, no. 5, Part 2, October, pp. S71S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, P. (1994), ‘The origins of endogenous growth’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 8, no. 1, Winter, pp. 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuelson, P.A. (1961), ‘The evaluation of ‘social income’: capital formation and wealth’, in Lutz, EA. and Hague, D.C., eds., The Theory of Capital, London: Macmillan, pp. 3257.Google Scholar
Schultz, T.W. (1961), ‘Investment in human capital’, American Economic Review, vol. 51, no. 1, March, pp. 117.Google Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1957), ‘Technical change and the aggregate production function’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 39, no. 3, August, pp. 312320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1960), ‘Investment and technical progress’, in Arrow, K.J., Karlin, S., and Suppes, P., eds, Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959, Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 89104.Google Scholar
Solow, R.M. (1992), Growth Theory, 2nd ed, New York: Oxford University Press (1st ed, 1970).Google Scholar
Stone, R. (1992), ‘The accounts of society’, in Maler, K.-G., ed, Nobel Lectures: Economic Sciences, 1981-1990, pp. 115139.Google Scholar
Summers, R. and Heston, A. (1984), ‘Improved international comparisons of real product and its composition: 1950-1980’, Review of Income and Wealth, Series 30, no. 2, June, pp. 207–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Summers, R., and Heston, A. (1991), ‘The Penn World Table (Mark 5): an expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-1988’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 106, Issue 2, May, pp. 327368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, J. (1942), ‘On the theory of trend movements’, in Jan Tinbergen, Selected Papers, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1959, pp. 182221Google Scholar
(translated from ‘Zur theorie der langfristigen wirtschaftsentwicklung’, Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, band 55, nu. 1, 1942, pp. 511549).Google Scholar
Triplett, J. (1966), ‘Measuring the capital stock: a review of concepts and data needs’, Economic Inquiry, vol. 34, no. 1, January, pp. 93115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations (1968), A System of National Accounts, New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
World Bank (1994), World Development Report 1993, Washington: World Bank.Google Scholar