Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T17:14:24.838Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Russian Nationalism Today: Organizations and Programs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

John B. Dunlop
John B. Dunlop*
Affiliation:
The Hoover Institution
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Russian nationalists in the Soviet Union have, of course, always claimed to speak and act on behalf of the narod, the common folk, but the folk they have had in mind have been largely the inhabitants, and particularly the older inhabitants, of the fast-disappearing traditional Russian village. Aware that this narod has indeed been vanishing, Russian nationalist writers and publicists have stressed that the task at hand is to graft the “ethics and esthetics,” the accumulated wisdom and mores of this traditionalist populace, onto the life of deracinated modern Soviet man. The really existing and largely urbanized Russian narod—factory workers, miners, truck drivers, cashiers, and waitresses—has remained beyond the purview of most nationalists, with the exception of a few like the gifted writer and filmmaker Vasilii Shukshin (d. 1974), who focused upon the plight of a people torn away from its roots.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 19 , Issue 2: Special Issue - Pamyat , Fall 1991 , pp. 146 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by the Association for the Study of the Nationalities of the USSR and Eastern Europe, Inc. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. See “Tezisy k programme prakticheskoi deiatelnosti Mezhregional'noi gruppy narodnykh deputatov SSSR po uglubleniiu i realizatsii perestroiki,” Tartuskii kurer, No. 5, September 1–15, pp. 3–6.Google Scholar

2. “Moskvichi otsenivaiut,” Vecherniaia Moskva, August 4, 1989. For the results of another recent poll taken in Moscow, see the October 11 issue of the same newspaper.Google Scholar

3. See the booklet Partiia i perestroika, prepared by the “Politika” discussion club of the Moscow Higher Party School (Moscow, 1989), pp. 66–76.Google Scholar

4. “Obshchestvennoe mnenie o narodnykh deputatakh,” Argumenty ifakty, No.40, October 7–13, 1989, p. 1.Google Scholar

5. See “Natsional'naia politika partii v sovremennykh usloviiakh,” Pravda, September 24, 1989 and the interview with Vlasov “Interesy Rossii,” Izvestiia, September 1, 1989, p. 3.Google Scholar

6. Vladimir Sokolov, “Kontseptsiia,” Literaturnaia gazeta, August 2, 1989, p. 10.Google Scholar

7. For a discussion of Primakov's plan, see Roman Szporluk, “Dilemmas of Russian Nationalism” Problems of Communism, July/August, 1989, p. 19.Google Scholar

8. Izabella Soloveva, “Novyi plan ‘Ost’ dlia Rossii,” Literaturnaia Rossiia, October 20, 1989, p. 3.Google Scholar

9. On this, see John B. Dunlop, “Soviet Cultural Politics,” Problems of Communism, November-December, 1987, pp. 45–47.Google Scholar

10. Moskovskii literator, Nos. 49–50, December 16, 1988, p. 3. For a discussion of the new association, see John B. Dunlop, “Two Noteworthy Russian Nationalist Initiatives,” Report on the USSR, May 26, 1989, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

11. See Literaturnaia Rossiia, June 16, 1989, p. 11.Google Scholar

12. On this new organization, see Dunlop, “Two Noteworthy Russian Nationalist Initiatives,” pp. 3–4.Google Scholar

13. In Literaturnaia Rossiia, March 17, 1989, p. 4.Google Scholar

14. On the United Council, see “Narod—za soglasie!” Literaturnaia Rossiia, September 22, 1989, p. 5. The well-known neo-Stalinist military novelist, Aleksandr Prokhanov, has recently moved to the “left” and become a member of the coordinating council of this new organization. See the interview with him in Krasnaia zvezda, October 24, 1989.Google Scholar

15. See Alain Besançon, “Nationalism and Bolshevism in the USSR” in Robert Conquest, ed., The Last Empire (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1986), p. 11.Google Scholar

16. See Reestr, May 23, 1989.Google Scholar

17. See Moskovskie novosti, No. 7, 1990, p. 14. The so-called “Pamyat-II” group under Igor Sychev appears to have been encouraged by the regime in order to weaken “Pamyat-II” under Ioakim (Kim) Andreev and Dmitrii Vasilev. The No. 23, 1988 issue of Argumenty i fakty reported that Vasilev had been summoned to the KGB and warned that he could be charged under Article 74 of the RSFSR Criminal Code with “inciting national discord.” The No. 52, 1988 issue of Moskovskie novosti published a summary of an interview with the procurator of the City of Leningrad, who said that meetings of Pamyat in the city had been prohibited due to violations of Article 36 of the Soviet Constitution.Google Scholar

18. For the program of the Christian Patriotic Union, see Veche (Munich), No. 32, 1988, p. 205–214.Google Scholar

19. For Osipov's view of the schism, see the samizdat declarations “Virus predatelstva” (July, 1989) and “Vzvod Ovchinnikova za rabotoi” (August, 1989). For the views of the Pashnin group, see the July 1989 issue of Russkii vestnik, a samizdat journal.Google Scholar

20. On this new organization, see Moskovskii literator, No. 23, May 26, 1989, p. 2; Literaturnaia Rossiia, June 23, 1989, p. 14; and Novgorodskii komsomolets, June 25, 1989.Google Scholar

21. See Douglas Smith, “Moscow's ‘Otechcstvo’,” Report on the USSR, July 28, 1989, p. 8.Google Scholar

22. On this organization, see Moskovskii literator, No. 14, March 24, 1989; Slovo, No. 7, 1989, pp. 1–2; and Douglas Smith, “Formation of the Russian Nationalist Group Announced,” Report on the USSR. July 7. 1989. pp. 5–8.Google Scholar

23. On the “Unity” Movement, see “Za edinstvo i sodruzhestvo,” Literaturnaia Rossiia, July 28, 1989, pp. 8–9.Google Scholar

24. In The Jerusalem Post, August 24, 1989, p. 4.Google Scholar

25. For the statement, see Literaturnaia Rossiia, August 4, 1989, p. 5.Google Scholar

26. See the account of the conference in Literaturnaia Rossiia, September 22, 1989.Google Scholar

27. Sobolev's letter appeared in Literaturnaia Rossiia, September 22, 1989, p. 15.Google Scholar

28. See Anatolii Salutskii, “Uralskoeprotivostoianie,” Part I in Literaturnaia Rossiia, October 6, 1989, p. 4 and Part II in the October 13, 1989 issue of the same publication, pp. 10–11.Google Scholar

29. See footnote The Economist, October 28, 1989, p. 55.Google Scholar

30. Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Daily Report, No. 203, October 25, 1989.Google Scholar

31. See Sovetskaia Rossiia, October 11, 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar

32. See Moskovskie novosti, No. 44, p. 2.Google Scholar

33. See Moskovskie novosti, No. 29, 1989, p. 2.Google Scholar

34. See Financial Times, October 23, 1989.Google Scholar

35. Ibid.Google Scholar

36. On Ogorodnikov's organization, see John B. Dunlop, “Christian Democratic Party Founded in Moscow,” Report on the USSR, October 13, 1989, pp. 1–2. On Father Iakunin's organization, see Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, Daily Report, April 9, 1990.Google Scholar

37. See the interview with Zalygin in Moskovskie novosti, No. 29, 1989, p. 13.Google Scholar

38. “Solzhenitsyn vozvrashchaetsia?” Sobesednik, No. 32, 1989, p. 14. On recent developments with regard to Solzhenitsyn in the USSR, see John B. Dunlop, “Solzhenitsyn Begins to Emerge from the Political Void,” Report on the USSR, September 8, 1989, pp. 1–6, and “Reactions in the USSR to Solzhenitsyn's Gulag Archipelago,” Report on the USSR, March 9, 1990, pp. 3–8.Google Scholar

39. In Literaturnaia Rossiia, December 29, 1989, pp. 2–3.Google Scholar

40. In Literaturnaia Rossiia, February 23, 1990, p. 5.Google Scholar

41. For the election results, see Moskovskaia pravda, March 8, 1990, pp. 2–4.Google Scholar

42. See Moscow News, No. 12, 1990, p. 4.Google Scholar