Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T19:01:04.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Sanctuary of a sacred nation: National discourse in the style and décor of the Licheń Sanctuary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Piotr Kisiel
Piotr Kisiel*
Affiliation:
Department of History and Civilization, European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole (FI), Italy
*
∗Email: piotr.kisiel@eui.eu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Basilica of Our Lady of Licheń, located near Konin in the Greater Poland Voivodeship, provides a unique insight into a nationalistic discourse in contemporary Poland. It was created not only as a Catholic shrine but also as a place of patriotic indoctrination. This paper examines not only the architecture and design of the Church and the surrounding Sanctuary, but also the ideas of Rev. Eugeniusz Makulski, the site's founder, and Barbara Bielecka, its architect, in order to understand one of the important currents in a debate on the Polish post-Communist identity. A close analysis of this religious shrine is intended not only to understand this particular site but also to examine how national identity is (re)defined in architecture. As this paper shows, the employment of symbolic devices allows the creation of a coherent story of the Polish nation as a religious community with a history intrinsically linked to the Catholic Church. However, the annexation of the lay sphere (nation) by the sacred one (religion) leads to problematic results when it comes to the universality of the religion and the “nationalization” of the Catholic Church itself.

Keywords

nationalismsymbolsarchitecturesymbolic politicsPoland
Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 319 - 339
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atkinson, David, and Cosgrove, Dennis. 1998. “Urban Rhetoric and Embodied Identities: City, Nation, and Empire at the Vittorio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870-1945.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88 (1): 28–49.Google Scholar
Berglund, Henrik. 2004. “Religion and Nationalism: Politics of BJP.” Economic and Political Weekly10 (39): 1064–1070.Google Scholar
Bielecka, Barbara. n.d. Polskie sacrum. Accessed July 10, 2014. http://www.deigratia.pl/pdf/album.pdf/.Google Scholar
Blawat, Agata. 2008. “Zarażaniepięknem.” Plelgrzym 17: 17–18.Google Scholar
Bottici, Chiara. 2007. A Philosophy of Political Myth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowdler, Neil. 1998. “Polish Priest Raises a Rival for Lourdes.” The Guardian, June 20. www.texnews.com/1998/religion/rival0620.html/.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2012. “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches.” Nations and Nationalism 1 (18): 2–20.Google Scholar
Byrnes, Timothy A. 1996. “The Catholic Church and Poland's Return to Europe.” East European Quarterly 4 (30): 433–448.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2012. “Religion and Nationalism: Four Approaches.” Nations and Nationalism 1 (18): 2–20.Google Scholar
Čolović, Ivan. 2002. The Politics of Symbol in Serbia. London: Hurst & Company.Google Scholar
Confino, Alon. 1993. “The Nation as a Local Metaphor: Heimat, National Memory and the German Empire, 1871-1918.” History and Memory 1 (5): 42–86.Google Scholar
Crowley, David, and Reid, Susan E., eds. 2002. Socialist Spaces: Sites of Everyday Life in the Eastern Bloc. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Dmochowska, Halina, ed. 2011. Concise Statistical Yearbook of Poland. Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.Google Scholar
Dörner, Andreas. 1995. Politischer Mythos und symbolische Politik. Sinnstiftung durch symbolische Formen am Beispiel des Hermannsmythos. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Duncan, James. 2005. The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the Kandyan Kingdom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dzienisiewicz, Izabella. 2002. “WizerunekLichenia w oczachmediów i pielgrzymów.” Polska Sztuka Ludowa - Konteksty 1-2 (56): 149–158.Google Scholar
Eidintas, Alfonsas, and Žalys, Vytautas. 1999. Lithuania in European Politics: The Years of the First Republic, 1918-1940. New York: St Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Ernst, Wolfgang. 1995. “Präsenz der Toten und symbolisches Gedenken: Das Völkerschlachtdenkmal zwischen Monument und Epitaph.” Chap. 3 in Vom Kult zur Kulisse. Das Völkerschlachtdenkmal als Gegenstand der Geschichtskultur, edited by Keller, Katrin and Schmid, Hans-Dieter, 62–77. Leipzig: Leipziger Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Flood, Christopher. 1996. Political Myth. A Theoretical Introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger. 2001. “Religious Nationalism and the Problem of Collective Representation.” Annual Review of Sociology 27: 125–152.Google Scholar
Gluchowski, Piotr, and Kowalski, Marcin. 2007. “Gusto Polacco.” Gazeta Wyborcza, April 9. http://wyborcza.pl/duzyformat/1,127291,4043349.html.Google Scholar
Grzesiak-Kozina, Agnieszka, and Kozina, Boleslaw. 2011. Mlejscaśwlęte: Licheń. Warszawa: Agora.Google Scholar
Haładewicz-Grzelak, Malgorzata, and Lubos-Kozieł, Joanna. 2014. “Story-ing Memory in the Licheń Pilgrimage Centre (Poland).” European Journal of Cultural Studies 17 (6): 647–664.Google Scholar
“Jubileuszks. Eugeniusza Makulskiego.” 2013. Nasz Dzlennik, June 26. http://www.naszdziennik.pl/wiara-kosciol-w-polsce/39998/.Google Scholar
Kattago, Siobhan. 2012. Memory and Representation in Contemporary Europe. The Persistence of the Past. Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Klekot, Ewa. 2002. “Święteobrazki, Licheń i sadsmaku.” Konteksty: Polska Sztuka Ludowa: Antropologia Kultury, Etnografia, Sztuka 1-2 (56): 256–257.Google Scholar
Kloczowski, Jan. 1993. “Katolicyzm'otwarty’ i jegowrogowie.” Znak 8 (45): 14–16.Google Scholar
Kolodzieczyk, Małgorzata. 2000. “Wotum jubileuszowe.” Gość Niedzielny 34. http://www.opoka.org.pl/biblioteka/Z/ZK/Licheń_bazylika.html#.Google Scholar
Kramer, Lloyd. 1997. “Historical Narratives and the Meaning of Nationalism.” Journal of the History of Ideas 58 (3): 525–545.Google Scholar
Krochmal, Zbigniew. 2010. “Profanum w slużbie sacrum sanktuariumlicheńskiego.” Peregrinus Cracoviensis 21: 133–149.Google Scholar
Kula, Agnieszka. 2002. “Licheńska Golgota jako przykład wznowienia tradycji oraz popularności nabozeństwa Drogi Krzyzowej.” Polska Sztuka Ludowa. Konteksty 56 (1-2): 126–134.Google Scholar
Lasswell, Harold. 1979. The Signature of Power: Buildings, Communication, and Policy. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Lubos-Kozieł, Joanna, and Haładewicz-Grzelak, Małgorzata. 2013. “The Analysis of Licheń's Holy Icon as a Case Study in Semiotic Fortition.” Semiotica 195: 197–248.Google Scholar
Makulski, Eugeniusz. 1993. Licheń: Sanktuarium Maryjne. Warszawa: Wydaw. Księży Marianów.Google Scholar
Marciniak, Katarzyna. 1999. Licheń i jegoświat. Poznań: Wydawnictwo eMPi2.Google Scholar
Marciniak, Katarzyna. 2000. “Licheń. Historyczne i estetyczne aspekty funkcjonowania miejsca świętego we współczesnej Polsce.” In Z problematyki przemian kultury polskiej w XX wieku, edited by Skotarczak, Dorota, 257–280. Poznań: Instytut Historii Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza.Google Scholar
Marody, Mira, and Mandes, Slawomir. 2005. “On Functions of Religion in Molding the National Identity of Poles.” International Journal of Sociology 4 (35): 49–68.Google Scholar
Nipperdey, Thomas. 1981. “Der Köhler Dom als National denkmal.” Historische Zeitschrift 233: 595–613.Google Scholar
Omilanowska, Malgorzata. 2008. “SanktuariumMaryjne w Licheniu: jego architektura i sztukajako instrument identyfikacjihistorycznej religijnej i narodowej w postkomunistycznej Polsce.” Konteksty 2: 129–139.Google Scholar
Osa, Maryjane. 1989. “Resistance, Persistence, and Change: The Transformation of the Catholic Church in Poland.” East European Politics & Societies 3 (3): 268–299.Google Scholar
Paszek, Stefan. 2002. DziejeLichenia. Historia powstania Zakonu Marianów. Konin: Markuz.Google Scholar
Porter, Brian. 2011. Faith and Fatherland: Catholicism, Modernity, and Poland. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rieffer, Barbara-Ann. 2003. “Relationship Religion and Nationalism: Understanding the Consequences of a Complex.” Ethnicities 3 (2): 215–242.Google Scholar
Santiago, Jose. 2009. “From ‘Civil Religion’ to Nationalism as the Religion of Modern Times: Rethinking a Complex Relationship.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 48 (2): 394–401.Google Scholar
Schorske, Carl. 1981. Fin-de-siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Sekerdej, Kinga, Pasieka, Agnieszka, and Warat, Marta. 2007. “Popular Religion and Postsocialist Nostalgia: Licheń as a Polysemic Pilgrimage Center in Poland.” Polish Sociological Review 4 (160): 431–444.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 2001. Nationalism: Theory, Ideology, History. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Sonne, Wolfgang. 2003. Representing the State: Capital City Planning in the Early Twentieth Century. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Störtkuhl, Beate. 2012. “Architecture in the Tension-Zone of National Assertiveness - the Examples of Poznan and Upper Silesia in the First Decades of the 20th Century.” Artmargins Online. http://www.artmargins.com/index.php/archive/312-architecture-in-the-tension-zone-of-national-assertiveness-the-examples-of-poznan-and-upper-silesia-in-the-first-decades-of-the-20th-century/.Google Scholar
Szacka, Barbara. 2006. Czas przeszły, pamięć, mit. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
Polsce, “Szlaki pielgrzymkowe w.” 2011. Katolicka Agencja Informacyjna, July 29. http://ekai.pl/wydarzenia/temat_dnia/x44367/szlaki-pielgrzymkowe-w-polsce/.Google Scholar
Umbach, Maiken. 2005. “A Tale of Second Cities: Autonomy, Culture, and the Law in Hamburg and Barcelona in the Late Nineteenth Century.” American Historical Review 110 (3): 659–692.Google Scholar
Vander Veer, , Peter, , and Lehmann, Hartmut, eds. 1999. Nation and Religion. Perspectives on Europe and Asia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Yeoh, Brenda. 1996. “Street-Naming and Nation-Building: Toponymic Inscriptions of Nationhood in Singapore.” Area 3 (28): 298–307.Google Scholar
“z Lichenia.” 2004. Newsweek. July 20. http://polska.newsweek.pl/zebrak-z-Lichenia,19688,1,1.html.Google Scholar
Zubrzycki, Genevieve. 2006. The Crosses of Auschwitz: Nationalism and Religion in PostCommunist Poland. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Zebrak Press.Google Scholar