No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Regionalist Parties in Central Government: A Shift in Ministerial Portfolio Preferences?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 September 2021
Abstract
This article takes a closer look at the ministerial representation of peripheral elites in central state institutions. We assess the ministerial portfolios that regionalist parties hold once they enter national government. We use a novel dataset that consists of a large sample of ministerial posts (N=1880) allocated to regionalist parties across Western multilevel democracies throughout the post–World War II period. An empirical analysis shows that regionalist parties control a disproportionately high share of the minister posts, a proportionate share of the policy domains, and a disproportionately low share of the key leadership positions in national cabinets. They have a distinctive preference to hold territorial and institutional (that is, decentralization) responsibilities in their ministerial portfolios. In contrast, concerning secondary policy domains (social-economic and culture-identity) they appear to be highly flexible. Ministerial appointments are an important gateway for peripheral elites to get access to central state institutions. It is also one of the clearest manifestations of (policy) payoffs: portfolios are meaningful tools to defend the interests of a territorial subgroup. Yet, there is no straight line from portfolio distribution to policy outcomes at the end of a legislative term. Resolving this broader question of a party’s influence on public policy requires continued research.
Keywords
- Type
- Special Issue Article
- Information
- Nationalities Papers , Volume 51 , Issue 5: Special Issue on Peripheral Elites in West European Central States’ Apparatus , September 2023 , pp. 1090 - 1104
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Albertazzi, Daniele, and McDonnell, Duncan. 2005. “The Lega Nord in the Second Berlusconi Government: In a League of Its Own.” West European Politics 28 (5): 952–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alonso, Sonja 2012. Challenging the State. Devolution and the Battle for Partisan Credibility: A Comparison of Belgium, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäck, Hanna, Debus, Marc, and Dumont, Patrick. 2011. “Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (4): 441–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouteca, Nicolas, and Devos, Carl. 2016. “Party Policy Change: Exploring the Limits of Ideological Flexibility in Belgium.” Acta Politica 51 (3): 298–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Eric C., and Feste, Karen Ann. 1975. “Qualitative Dimensions of Coalition Payoffs: Evidence of European Party Governments 1945–1970.” American Behavioral Scientist 18 (4): 530–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browne, Eric C., and Franklin, Mark N.. 1973. “Aspects of Coalition Payoffs in European Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 67 (2): 453–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Farlie, Dennis. 1983. “Party Competition: Selective Emphasis or Direct Confrontation? An Alternative View with Data.” In Western European Party Systems: Continuity and Change, edited by Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter, 267–305. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, and Laver, Michael. 1986. “Office Seeking and Policy Pursuit in Coalition Theory.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11 (4): 485–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dandoy, Régis. 2014. “The Impact of Government Participation and Prospects on Party Policy Preferences in Belgium.” Government and Opposition 49 (4): 629–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dandoy, Régis, and Sandri, Giulia. 2007. “Regionalism and Party Programs. Comparative Analysis of the Content of the Manifestos of Regionalist Parties in Europe.” Paper presented at the conference of the Società Italiana di Scienza Politica, Catania, September 20–22.Google Scholar
Deschouwer, Kris. 2008. New Parties in Government: In Power for the First Time. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Winter, Lieven. 1998. “Conclusion: A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral, Office and Policy Success of Ethnoregionalist Parties.” In egionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by De Winter, Lieven and Huri, Türsan, 204–247. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Druckman, James N., and Warwick, Paul W.. 2005. “The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 44 (1): 17–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Anwen, Szocsik, Edina, and Zuber, Christina Isabel. 2015. “Position, Selective Emphasis and Framing: How Parties Deal with a Second Dimension in Competition.” Party Politics 21 (6): 839–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elias, Anwen, and Tronconi, Filippo. 2011. “From Protest to Power: Autonomist Parties in Government.” Party Politics 17 (4): 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Jörn, Dowding, Keith, and Dumont, Patrick. 2012. “The Duration and Durability of Cabinet Ministers.” International Political Science Review 33 (5): 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 1998. “Is Nationalism a Distinct Ideology?” Political Studies 46 (4): 748–765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, William A. 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26 (3): 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Reino, Margarita. 2006. “Conclusion: The Future Study of Autonomist and Regionalist Parties.” In Autonomist Parties in Europe: Identity Politics and The Revival of Territorial Cleavage, edited by De Winter, Lieven, Gómez-Reino, Margarita, and Lynch, Peter, 247–269. Barcelona: Institut de Ciències Politiques i Socials.Google Scholar
Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Mortensen, Peter B.. 2010. “Who Sets the Agenda and Who Responds to it in the Danish Parliament? A New Model of Issue Competition and Agenda‐Setting.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (2): 257–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Zachary. 2014. “How Incumbency Structures the Electoral Impact of Issue Diversity in Parties’ Campaign Messages.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 28–31.Google Scholar
Hague, Rod, Harrop, Martin, and McCormick, John. 2016. Comparative Government and Politics: An Introduction. 10th ed. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harguindéguy, Jean-Baptiste, Peinado, Alejandro, and Sandri, Giulia. 202#. “Peripheral Elites in West European Central States’ Apparatuses: An Introduction.” Nationalities Papers # (#) (this issue).Google Scholar
Harmel, Robert, and Janda, Kenneth. 1995. “Substance vs. Packaging: An Empirical Analysis of Parties’ Issue Profiles.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, August 31–September 3.Google Scholar
Höhmann, Daniel, and Sieberer, Ulrich 2020. “Parliamentary Questions as a Monitoring Device in Coalition Governments.” West European Politics 43 (1): 225–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth A.. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libbrecht, Liselotte, Maddens, Bart, and Swenden, Wilfried. 2013. “Party Competition in Regional Elections: The Strategies of State-Wide Parties in Spain and the United Kingdom.” Party Politics 19 (4): 624–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipset, Seymour M., and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Marks, Gary, Wilson, Carole J., and Ray, Leonard. 2002. “National Political Parties and European Integration.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (3): 585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Shane, and Whitaker, Richard 2019. “Beyond Committees: Parliamentary Oversight of Coalition Government in Britain.” West European Politics 42 (7): 1464–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, Emanuele, and Sandri, Giulia. 2013. “Italy: Between Growing Incongruence and Region-Specific Dynamics.” In Regional and National Elections in Western Europe. The Comparative Territorial Politics series, edited by Régis, Dandoy and Schakel, Arjan H., 142–161. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massetti, Emanuele, and Schakel, Arjan H.. 2016. “Decentralisation Reforms and Regionalist Parties’ Strength: Accommodation, Empowerment or Both?” Political Studies 65 (2): 432–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoleni, Oscar, and Mueller, Sean. 2016. “Introduction: Explaining the Policy Success of Regionalist Parties in Western Europe.” In Regionalist Parties in Western Europe: Dimensions of Success, edited by Mazzoleni, Oscar and Mueller, Sean, 1–21. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Rommel, Ferdinand. 1998. “Ethnoregionalist Parties in Western Europe: Theoretical Considerations and Framework of Analysis.” In
Regionalist Parties in Western Europe, edited by Lieven De Winter and Huri Türsan, 17–27. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Petrocik, John R. 1996. “Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study.” American Journal of Political Science 40 (3): 825–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, Stein, and Urwin, Derek W.. 1983. Economy, Territory, Identity: Politics of West European Peripheries. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1996. “The Politics of Ethnicity and Nationalism.” International Affairs 72 (3): 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stolz, Klaus. 2010. Towards a Regional Political Class? Professional Politicians and Regional Institutions in Catalonia and Scotland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare. 2000. “Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies.” European Journal of Political Research 37 (3): 261–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, and Müller, Wolfgang C.. 1999. “The Keys to Togetherness: Coalition Agreements in Parliamentary Democracies.” Journal of Legislative Studies 5 (3–4): 255–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stefanova, Boyka M. 2014. “An Ethnonational Perspective on Territorial Politics in the EU: East-West Comparisons from a Pilot Study.” Nationalities Papers 42 (3): 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tavits, Margit. 2007. “Principle vs. Pragmatism: Policy Shifts and Political Competition.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (1): 151–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrière, Lorenzo. 2019. Regionalist Parties and their Minister Portfolios (dataset). https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/zg6y643fhm/1. (Accessed December 26, 2019.)Google Scholar
Terrière, Lorenzo, and Bouteca, Nicolas. 2020. “With Respect for the Core Business: The Impact of Party Ideology on the Odds of Government Participation among Regionalist Parties.” Acta Politologica 12 (3): 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tronconi, Filippo. 2015. “Ethno-regionalist Parties in Regional Government: Multilevel Coalition Strategies in Italy and Spain”. Government and Opposition 50 (4): 579–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volkens, Andrea, Lehmann, Pola, Matthieß, Theres, Merz, Nicolas, Regel, Sven, and Weßels, Bernhard. 2017. Manifesto Project Dataset (version 2017b). https://manifesto-project.wzb.eu/datasets/MPDS2017b.Google Scholar
Wagner, Markus. 2011. “Defining and Measuring Niche Parties.” Party Politics 18 (6): 845–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, Markus, and Meyer, Thomas M.. 2017. “The Radical Right as Niche Parties? The Ideological Landscape of Party Systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014.” Political Studies 65 (1 suppl): 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warwick, Paul W., and Druckman, James N.. 2006. “The Portfolio Allocation Paradox: An Investigation into the Nature of a Very Strong but Puzzling Relationship.” European Journal of Political Research 45 (4): 635–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terrière and Bouteca supplementary material
Appendices
File
32.6 KB