Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-l82ql Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-27T06:54:32.470Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relations Between Ukrainian Central Rada and the Russian Provisional Government ∗

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Wolodymyr Stojko
Wolodymyr Stojko*
Affiliation:
Manhattan College, Bronx, N.Y.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the new situation created by the collapse of the Tsarist regime in March 1917, the non-Russian peoples directed their efforts towards the realization of their national goals. Ukrainians, who took an active part in the overthrow of the Tsarist rule in Petrograd, were among the most active in asserting their national aspirations and laying foundations for a new relationship with Russia. Leadership of the Ukrainian national movement was in the hands of the Ukrainian Central Rada. The Rada was formed on March 17, 1917, with the participation of representatives of principal Ukrainian organizations. It established a broader base when the All-Ukrainian National Congress convened in Kiev on April 19–21, 1917. The Congress was attended by 900 delegates and some 600 other participants, representing peasant, professional, military, and cultural-educational organizations, in addition to political parties, municipalities, and zemstvos, within as well as beyond the Ukraine.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , Spring 1975 , pp. 34 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © Association for the Study of Nationalities, 1975 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1 All dates in this paper are given according to the Gregorian calendar.Google Scholar

2 For an account of Ukrainian activities in Petrograd see: O. Lototskyi, Storinky mynuloho, Vol. III (Warsaw: Ukrainskyi Naukovyi Instytut, 1934), pp. 315, 327; I. G. Tsereteli, Vospominaniia o Fevralskoi Revolutsii (Paris: Mouton & Co., 1963); V. Vynnychenko, Vidrodzhennia natsii, Vol. I (Kiev-Vienna: Vyd. Dzvin, 1920), p. 252; and D. Doroshenko, Istoriia Ukrainy, 1917–1923rr., Vol. I (2nd ed.; New York: Bulava Publ. Corp., 1954).Google Scholar

3 V. Mänilov (ed.), 1917 god na Kievshchine: khronika sobytii (Kiev: Gos. Izd. Ukrainy, 1928), p. 6; D. Doroshenko, Vol. I, p.42.Google Scholar

4 N. Avdeev, Revoliutsiia 1917 goda: khronika sobytii, Vol. II (Moscow: Gos. Izd., 1923), p. 24.Google Scholar

5 Text of the resolution in R. P. Browder and A. F. Kerensky (eds.), The Russian Provisional Government, 1917: Documents (Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1961), Vol. I, pp. 372–373. A slightly different version appears in Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 58–59.Google Scholar

6 Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 543–544.Google Scholar

7 S. Yefremov, Istoriia Ukrainskoho pysmenstva, Vol. II (Kiev-Leipzig: Ukraiinska Nakl., 1919), pp. 242–244.Google Scholar

8 B. Martos, “First Universal of the Ukrainian Central Rada,” The Ukrainian Quarterly, XXIV, 1 (New York, 1968), pp. 23ff.; M. Kovalevskyi, Pry dzherelakh borotby (Munich: ‘Biblos,’ 1960), pp. 285–286. For a different interpretation see L. Shankovskyi, “Ukrainska natsionalno-vyzvolna revoliutsiia,” Almanakh Providinnia na rik 1967 (Philadelphia: Vyd. ‘America,’ 1967), pp. 124–156.Google Scholar

9 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 370; D. Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 42.Google Scholar

10 V. Chernov, The Great Russian Revolution (New York: Russell and Russell, 1966), p. 266. See also Manilov, pp. 3–4, and Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 90.Google Scholar

11 S. M. Dimanstein, (ed.), Revoliutsiia i natsionalnyi vopros, fev.-okt. 1917, Vol III (Moscow: Izd. Kom. Akademii, 1930), pp. 143–149; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 374–376.Google Scholar

12 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 88–89.Google Scholar

13 Ibid.; P. Khrystiuk, Zamitky i materialy do istorii Ukrainskoi Revolutsii, 1917–1920, Vol. I (Vienna, 1921), p. 128, n. 19.Google Scholar

14 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 83–84; F. F. Kokoshkin, Avtonomiia i federatsiia (Petrograd: ‘Svoboda,‘ 1917).Google Scholar

15 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 317.Google Scholar

16 The deliberations of the commission can be found in “Iz istorii natsional'noi politiki Vremennogo Prayitelstva,” Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. XXX (Moscow: Goz. Izd., 1928), pp. 49–55.Google Scholar

17 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 83; for the text of the resolutions see Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 150–153.Google Scholar

18 Manilov, p. 99.Google Scholar

19 Text of the communique in Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 376–377.Google Scholar

20 Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 96.Google Scholar

21 Vynnychenko, Vol. I, p. 200.Google Scholar

22 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 89 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 383 ff.; Chernov, p. 277.Google Scholar

23 Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. XXX, p. 55; Tsereteli, Vol. II, p. 104.Google Scholar

24 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 94–95; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 386–389.Google Scholar

25 Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 100 ff.; Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 240ff.; Khrystiuk, Vol. I, pp. 62–64, 88–89; Manilov, pp. 118–122, 127–128.Google Scholar

26 Browder and Kerensky, Vol., I, pp. 385–386; Manilov, p. 484.Google Scholar

27 Dimanstein, Vol. III, pp. 98 ff; Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 107ff.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., p. 133.Google Scholar

29 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 389–390.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., Vol. I, pp. 392–393. Vynnychenko contends in his memoirs that de facto autonomy already existed in July, 1917. Vynnychenko, Vol. I, pp. 284–285.Google Scholar

31 F. A. Golder (ed.), Documents of Russian History, 1914–17 (New York-London: The Century Co., 1927), p. 441. For an account of the Provisional Government meeting see Tsereteli, Vol. II, pp. 149 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 390–392.Google Scholar

32 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 115–116.Google Scholar

33 Miliukov, Vol. I, pt. 1, p. 80 ff.; Manilov, p. 153; S. Shemet, “M. Mikhnovskyi,” Khliborobska Ukraina, kn. 5 (Vienna, 1924–25), p. 21; Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 368.Google Scholar

34 Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 119 ff. The number of non-Ukrainian members in the Rada was to be 202 and 51 candidates out of a total of 822. Ibid., P. 123; Manilov, p. 184.Google Scholar

35 Ibid., pp. 489 ff.; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 394 ff.Google Scholar

36 Miliukov, Vol. I, pt. 2, p. 86.Google Scholar

37 Text in Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 396–397.Google Scholar

38 Manilov, p. 503; Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, pp. 398–399; Khrystiuk, Vol. I, pp. 118–119.Google Scholar

39 Vynnychenko, Vol. II, p. 37.Google Scholar

40 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 139; Vynnychenko, Vol. II, pp. 40, 52, 54.Google Scholar

41 Materials of that Congress are published in the first issue of the organ of the Council of Peoples, Svobodnyi Soyuz, Kiev, Oct., 1917.Google Scholar

42 Browder and Kerensky, Vol. I, p. 401; Manilov, p. 298.Google Scholar

43 Doroshenko, Vol. I, p. 157; Khrystiuk, Vol. II, p. 40.Google Scholar

44 Dimanstein, Vol. III, p. 202; Manilov, p. 303.Google Scholar

45 Ibid., pp. 303–304; Doroshenko, Vol. I, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar

46 Regarding this question see the minutes of the most revealing discussion by the Juridical Council in Krasnyi Arkhiv, Vol. III, pp. 56–71.Google Scholar