Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T01:08:19.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slovakia and its Minorities 1939–1945: People With and Without National Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Yeshayahu Jelinek
Yeshayahu Jelinek*
Affiliation:
University of Haifa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In October 1966, a conference of Czech, Slovak, and Magyar historians discussed in Bratislava (Czechoslovakia) the characteristics of Fascism in their respective countries. The nature of Slovak nationalism caught the attention of the participants. While mainly analysing Slovak-Magyar relations, the scholars touched only slightly on some of the other ethnic groups living in Slovakia, Germans, Ukrainians, Poles, Gypsies, and Jews. In order to study and understand Slovak nationalism during the Second World War, problems and conditions of each of the above-metnioned groups should be studied. A mutual comparison might assist in the creation of a substantive summary. Yet even a most thoroughgoing analysis of the relations between a dominant nation and the subjected minorities would not provide us with a comprehensive definition of Slovak nationalism.

Type
Articles
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1976 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Príspevky k dejinám fašizmu v Českosiovensku a v Madarsku, Bratislava, 1969, pp. 309–321.Google Scholar

2. According to the census of December 31, 1938, out of 2,656,426 inhabitants of Slovakia, 2,260,894 were Slovaks, 77,488 Czechs, 69,106 Ruthenes, 128,347 Germans, 57,897 Magyars, 3,848 Poles, 28,763 Jews (85,045 proclaimed themselves as being of the Mosaic faith), 26,265 Gypsies. (Uzemie a obyvatellstvo Slovenskej Republiky a prehl'ad obcí a okresov odstupených Nemecku, Madarsku a Pol'sku, Bratislava, 1939, p. 11.)Google Scholar

3. The Slovak League was one of the main bodies in charge of promoting Slovakhood.Google Scholar

4. Pavol Čarnogurský, “Narodný stát,” Slovák (Bratislava), April 5, 1939.Google Scholar

5. The Slavonic minority in East Slovakia was termed variously as Ukrainians, Ruthenes, Russins, and Rusniaks. I shall use the terms, “Ukrainians” and “Ruthenes,” interchangeably.Google Scholar

6. No. 185/1939, paragraphs 91–95 of the Collection of Slovak Laws.Google Scholar

7. No. 255/1939 of the Collection of Slovak Laws; Regulations of the Minister of Interior No. 17 622-5/1939 of October 18, 1939.Google Scholar

8. No. 185/1939, paragraph 59, and No. 121/1940 of the Collection of Slovak Laws.Google Scholar

9. The Political Archives of the German Foreign Ministry, Bonn, File Inl II C 2421; Deutsche Gesandschaft, Kult 3, Nr. 6, Nr. 3325, Bratislava, June 1, 1943: Vortrag des deutschen Volksgruppenfeuhrer Ing. Franz Karmazin vor dem Voelkerrechtsausschuss der Deutschen Akademie in Berlin am 26.3.1943.Google Scholar

10. Supra; T-81, R 524, 5294846, Letter of Carl Hauskrecht, the head of the Office for Press and Propaganda of the German Party to the Deutscher Ausland Institut, Stuttgart, May 17, 1940. U. S. National Archives, Washington, D. C., German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va. The documents are identified by the microfilm roll number (R) and by the frame number. Each collection possesses its own National Archives Microcopy Number (T). The collections used T-81 (Deutscher Ausland Institute, DAI), T-120 (German Foreign Ministry and Chancellery Records), and T-175 (Reichsfuehrer SS and Chief of the German Police).Google Scholar

11. For example T-175, R 526, 9395550, The Office of the Prime Minister, Circular Letter No. 3693/V-1939, June 26, 1939; T-175, R 522, 9391741, Letter, Presov, April 4, 1941; Central Slovak State Archives, Bratislava, ZU, 99/43 prez, orig. Letter, No. 248, June 8, 1943.Google Scholar

12. T-175, R 524, 9394467, Letter, Spiškd Nová Ves, September 11, 1940.Google Scholar

13. For a summary of the Magyar complaints, see T-175, R 583, 000834-843, Report of the SS Sicherheitdienst on the situation of the Magyar minority, November 6, 1942.Google Scholar

14. The Magyar Party gained formal recognition on November 8, 1941. T-81, R 550, 53 24404.Google Scholar

15. See L'ubomír Lipták, “Mad'arskov politike slovenského štátu v rokoch 1939–1943, Historický Časopis, XV, 1 (1967), pp. 1–34.Google Scholar

16. T-120, R 1139, 443022, The German Legation in Slovakia to the German Foreign Ministry, September 19, 1939; T-175, R 583 000857-860 Letter of Franz Karmazin to Janos Eszterhazy and commentaries; cf. note No. 9.Google Scholar

17. Alojz Miškovič, Napravená Krivda. Vratené kraje vo Spiši, Orave a Čadcianskom okrese, Turčianský Sväty Martin, 1940, p. 93.Google Scholar

18. T-175, R 522, 93915-923, SS Sicherheitdienst report on the life of the Ruthenes.Google Scholar

19. T-175, R 522, 9391737, 9391739, 9391583, Reports on the activity of the Greek-Catholic Bishop.Google Scholar

20. T-175, R 514, 9381238, An address given by Dr. Tiso on July 6, 1942. See also Andrej Dudáš, Rusinská otzáka a jej pozadie, Buenos Aires, S. A., p. 139.Google Scholar

21. Supra, pp. 150–152. Dudáš, the Leutenant-General of Šariš-Zemplin administrative district (1940–1945), was a notorious Slovak chauvinist and Anti-Semite.Google Scholar

22. T-175, R 581, 000810-816, Imrich Zavadský, Bericht ueber die Reise im Gau Šariš-Zemplin, July 24, 1940, T-120, R 336, 24 8806, Letter, Woermann to Ribbentrop, November 22, 1940; T-175, R 522, 9391612, SS Sicherheitdienst report, April 23, 1941.Google Scholar

23. See the text of the German-Slovak treaty of November 21, 1939 in Miškovič, op. cit., pp. 9–12.Google Scholar

24. Slovák (Bratislava), October 26, 1939, and January 28, 1940. Narodný Pracovník, I, 8 (November 1940), pp. 178–180; II, 2 (February 1941), pp. 62–63; II, 5 (May 1941), p. 113; III, 3(March 1942), pp. 73–75; III, 6 (June 1942), pp. 187–190; IV, 1–2 (January-February 1943), p. 45, etc.Google Scholar

25. Proces proti vlastizradným biskupom Vojtaššakovi, Buzalkovi, Gojdičovi, Bratislava, 1951, pp. 26, 57, 58; cf. Andrej Bielovodský, Severné hranice Slovenska, Bratislava, S. A., pp. 140, 141.Google Scholar

26. Mikulaš Werner, “Rol'nika Cigáni. Príspevok k sociologií vidieka,” Narodný Pracovník, I, 9–10 (December 1940), p. 212.Google Scholar

27. No. 130/1940, paragraph 9 of the Collection of Slovak Laws.Google Scholar

28. Gardista (Žilina), July 30, and August 14, 1942; Slovakische Rundschau (Bratislava), III, 10 (May 15, 1942), p. 15.Google Scholar

29. Granzbote (Bratislava), April 29, 1941; T-175, R 520, 9389298, Reichsicherheithauptamt to the German Police Attache in Bratislava, November 1942; cf. Werner, op. cit.; Emilia Horvathová, Cigáni na Slovensku, Bratislava 1964, pp. 170, 171.Google Scholar

30. An expression used by the ranking officials of the Slovak Foreign Ministry, Yeshayahu Jelinek, “The ‘Final Solution'–the Slovak Version,” East European Quarterly, IV, 4 (January 1971), p. 12.Google Scholar

31. T-175, R 556, 9431610, SS Sicherheitdienst report on a Karmazin-Endroes conversation, January 3, 1940.Google Scholar

32. For a discussion of the information filtered to Slovakia, see my unpublished dissertation, Hlinka's Slovak People's Party, 1939–1945, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 1966, pp. 156–158.Google Scholar

33. Yeshayahu Jelinek, “The Role of the Jews in Slovakian Resistance,” Jahrbuecher fuer Geschichte Osteuropas, Neue Folge, XV, 3(September 1967), p. 419.Google Scholar

34. T-175, R 522, 9391614, Report of the German Legation about the situation of the Ukrainian minority, April 23, 1941.Google Scholar

35. Actes et Documentes du Saint Siege Relatifs a la Seconda Guerre Mondiale, Citta del Vaticano, 1967, Vol. 3, Document No. 87, p. 184, Orsenigo to Maglione, January 5, 1940; Doc. No. 104, p. 205, Maglione to Orsenigo, January 19, 1940; Doc. No. 118, p. 222, Orsenigo to Maglione, February 24, 1940; Doc. No. 320, p. 486, Notes of Msgr. Tardini, October 21, 1941, etc.Google Scholar

36. Livia Rothkirchen, “The Policy of Vatican and the Holocaust in “Independent Slovakia,” Yad Vashem Studies, VI (1966), pp. 23–45.Google Scholar

37. Slovák (Bratislava), May 1, 1940, p. 8. An address given by Dr. Tiso; T-175, R 529, 9400298, Franz Karmazin (?): Grundlinien zum Aufbau der Deutsch-Slovakischen Gesellschaft, November 2, 1939.Google Scholar