Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-07T13:48:55.189Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Imperial versus national discourse: the case of Russia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

David G. Rowley
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin–Platteville, Platteville, WI USA
Get access

Abstract

It is inaccurate and misleading to apply the term ‘nationalism’ to Russia prior to the present day. Both Tsarist and Soviet leaders sought to maintain an empire and not a nation-state, and their national consciousness was imperial rather than national. The lack of Russian nationalism was crucial for Russian history since it explains the failure of both Tsarist Russia and the Soviet Union. Modern societies cannot be successfully constructed upon the basis of imperial thinking. The absence of Russian nationalism also has significance for nationalism theory. Russia possessed the social, political and cultural characteristics that have been adduced as ‘causes’ of nationalism by a wide variety of scholars, yet Russia failed to develop a nationalist movement. This suggests that what is crucial to modern nationalism is the appearance of a particularist, secular ideology, since the most notable aspect in which Russia differed from Europe was Russia's universalistic, religious and imperialist discourse of national identity.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)