Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T16:16:45.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carriage of Goods

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

A. Korthals Altes
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Netherlands Judicial Decisions on Private International Law
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , December 1980 , pp. 378 - 382
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Viz., for the Bienville-cargo; for the Summit-cargo the time-limit was extended by agreement.

2. Cf., Tetley, , Marine Cargo Claims (1978) p. 59Google Scholar: American courts deem it sufficient if the true party comes forward before judgment is delivered.

3. See the comment by W.E. Haak, WPNR, no. 5288 pp. 865–866.

4. A similar opinion may be deduced from A.-G. Kist's Conclusion (NJ 1978 p. 1725, left, below), where he takes distance from the CA's judgment in this respect, stating with obvious reserve: “This interpretation (viz., of the Bill of Lading clause) rests for account of the CA …’

5. See Tetley, , op.cit., p. 59Google Scholar and Haak, , WPNR 1977, no. 5399.Google Scholar The Supreme Court's decision does not show whether any attention was paid to the comparative law issue.

6. Compare, for road-carriage, note B. Wachter (No. 3) at Supreme Court, 17 November 1978, NJ 1980, 484.