Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-x5cpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T09:13:41.380Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments of 27 September 1968*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

M. E. Koppenol-Laforce
M. E. Koppenol-Laforce
Affiliation:
Lecturer in Law, Erasmus University, Rotterdam
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
The EEC Convention on Jurisdiction and Judgments of 27 September 1968
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , August 1990 , pp. 233 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Now named Salvatorplatz-Grundstiicksgesellschaft mbH & Co. oHG Saarland.

2. ECJ, November 30, 1976 (21/76), G.J. Bier B.V. and Reinwater Foundation v. Mines de Potasse d'Alsace S.A. (1976) ECR 1735, NJ 1977 494 note J.C. Schultsz, 23 NILR (1976) 365 note J.P. Verheul.

3. ECJ, September 27, 1988 (189/87), NJ 1990 425 note J.C. Schultsz, Athanasios Kalfelis v. Bankhaus Schröder, Münchmeyer, Hengst and Co., trading under the corporate name of HEMA beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH KG and Others. Also in Vlas, P., Burgerlijke Rechtsvordering (loose leaf edition), part V. EC Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention, court decisions on Art. 5(3), in Rev. Crit. 1989, p. 112Google Scholar, with comment H. Gaudemet-Tallon.

4. ECJ, November 30, 1976 (21/76), see n. 2, supra.

5. Dashwood, A., Hacon, R.J. and White, R.C.A., A Guide to the Civil Jurisdiction and Judgments Convention (1987) p. 96Google Scholar.

6. ECJ, September 27, 1988 (189/87), see n. 3, supra.

7. ECJ, December 16, 1980 (814/79), Netherlands State v. Ruffler (1980) ECR 3807, NJ 1982 97 note J.C. Schultsz, 28 NILR (1981) 68 note J.P. Verheul.

8. Warner A.-G., ECR 3836.

9. ECJ, December 16, 1980 (814/79), see ii. 7 supra.

10. See also Morris, Dicey and, Morris, The Conflicts of Laws, eleventh edn. (1987) rule 29, p. 344Google Scholar.

11. As to the applicable law: Kropholler, J., Internationales Privaatrecht (1990) para. 53 IV 1, p. 431Google Scholar. As to the jurisdiction where the distinction is made between der Ort der Rechtsgutverletzung and der Ort des (weiteren) Schadenseintritts: Kropholler, J., Europaisches Zivilprozessrecht, Kommentar zum EuGVU (1987) art. 5 point 45Google Scholar.

12. Cf., for a complete inventarisation, Colloque à la Cour d'appel de Paris, ‘Ĺévaluation du préjudice corporel dans les pays de la Communauté’, preliminary report by A. Dessertine, October 1988: Viney, G., ‘Lautonomie du droit à réparation de la victime par ricochet par rapport à celui de la victime initiale’, D. 1974, chronique II, pp. 3–6Google Scholar.

13. For the Netherlands: Court of Appeal of 's-Hertogenbosch, October 31, 1978, NJ 1979, 368, 28 NILR (1981) 72 note J.P. Verheul; for the Federal Republic of Germany: Oberlandesgericht of Hamm, October 3, 1978, Repertory I-5.3-B9, (conclusions Advocate General Darmon in the Dumez case no. 21); for Italy: Tribunate of Rome, March 15, 1978 (AGIP SpA v. The British Petroleum Company Ltd. (BP) c.s.), Repertory I-5.3-B6, Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale, 1979, p. 96 and Tribunate of Monza, September 28, 1979 (Candy SpA v. Schell and Stocker Reinshagen GmbH), II foro padano, 1979, 1, p. 225 note S. Magelli; for France: Courde Cassation, January 27, 1982, Gazette du Palais, 1982, Juris, p. 365.

14. Court of Appeal of's-Hertogenbosch, October 31, 1978, NJ 1979, 368, see n. 13 supra.

15. Vlas, op. cit. n. 3, commentary 7 on Art. 5.

16. Verheul, J.P., Rechtsmacht in het Nederlandse internationaal privaatrecht (1982) Part 1, para. II 50Google Scholar.

17. See J.P. Verheul in his note to the decision of the Court of Appeal of's-Hertogenbosch, October 31, 1978 in 28 NILR (1981) 72.

18. Art. 83b ZWF (Ziekenfondswet) and Arts. 52a and 90 WAO (Wet op de arbeidsongeschiktheidsverzekering); when it concerns public servants: Art. 2 VOA (Verhaalswet Ongevallen Ambtenaren); car accidents: Art. 27 WAM (Wet Aansprakelijkheidsverzekering Motorvoertuigen).

19. Kropholler, Europaisches Zivilprozessrecht, op. cit. n. 11.

20. In Spain: Real, M. Desante, La competencia judicial en la comunidad europea, pp. 310 and 311, quoted in note 12 of the conclusions of Advocate General Darmon on the DumezcaseGoogle Scholar.

21. Verheul, , op. cit. n. 16, pp. 49 and SOGoogle Scholar.