Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T12:12:02.912Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Een onduidelijke bepaling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

I. Kisch
Get access

Extract

The first three paragraphs of article 13 of the Benelux Uniform Law on Conflicts of Law, as revised in 1969, read as follows.

1. In respect both of compulsory and not compulsory legal provisions, contracts shall be governed by the law as chosen by the parties.

2. As far as the contract is clearly localized in a given country, the choice of the parties cannot overrule such legal provisions of the said country as, in virtue of their particular character and purport, exclude the application of any different law.

3. Failing a choice by the parties, either explicit, or implicit but certain, the contract shall be governed by the law of the country with which it shows the narrowest points of contact.

The criticism to these paragraphs as offered in the foregoing paper, does not bear on the principles, as set out above, but on the wording thereof.

Type
Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , December 1970 , pp. 275 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Anders, , voor Duitsland, Doelle, Internationales Privatrecht, 1968, p. 113Google Scholar: “alle einschlägigen Umstände des Falles sind gleichmässig zu betrachten.”

2 Deelen, Hierover, Rechtskeuze, 1965, p. 270Google Scholar, en Janssen, laatstelijk, Totstandkoming van Internationale Handelskoop, 1970, p. 69.Google Scholar

3 Andere voorbeelden in het Recueil-Meijers s.v. Verdrag van Montevideo, artikel 37, s.v. China, artikel 23, en s.v. Siam, artikel 13.

4 Lemaire, , Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht, 1968, p. 256.Google Scholar

5 Kosters-Dubbink, Naar, p. 362.Google Scholar

6 Rigaux, , Droit international privé, 1968, nr. 357Google Scholar; De Winter, , W.P.N.R. 4990.Google Scholar

7 Kosters-Dubbink, , p. 348Google Scholar, en de daar geciteerde auteurs. Lemaire, A. W., p. 251Google Scholar, en Benelux eenvormig internationaal privaatrecht, 1969, p. 117.Google Scholar

8 Beschouwingen over het arrest, deels ook in verband met artikel 13: Hijmans van den Bergh, N.J. 1967, nr. 3; Kollewijn, W.P.N.R. 4983; De Winter, ibidem 4990 en N.J.B. 1966, p. 393; Struycken, , Revue critique 1967, p. 552Google Scholar; Deelen, , N.T.I.R. 1968, p. 94Google Scholar; van der Grinten, , Ars Aequi 1968, p. 342Google Scholar; Haak, , De Hague Rules en het Alnatiarrest, 1969Google Scholar; Hellema, , Beschouwingen over de Aanknopingsleer, 1969, p. 79.Google Scholar