Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-xkcpr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:27:59.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparations for the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea: Maritime Jurisdiction over Fisheries*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2009

William T. Loris
Get access

Extract

During the preparatory stages of the Third Conference on the Law of the Sea, there has been a wide range of opinion registered on the issue of the extent and nature of maritime jurisdiction over fisheries. It is the purpose of this paper to provide a summary and to comment upon the positions expressed on this matter by the various delegations to the preparatory sessions of the Conference. It is hoped that this paper will serve as a timely and useful reference for those with an interest in the outcome of the fisheries issue at the Third United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea.

Type
Articles
Information
Netherlands International Law Review , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , December 1973 , pp. 233 - 265
Copyright
Copyright © T.M.C. Asser Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. FAO, Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, Vol. 30, p. 436 (1970).Google Scholar

2. Chapman, W.M., “The Theory and Practice of International Fishery Development-Management”. 15 03. 1970Google Scholar (paper prepared for presentation before a group of experts at the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions. Santa Barbara, California, 21–23 April, 1970), p. 8. See also. United Nations. Economic and Social Council, Uses of the Sea (E/5120), 1972, p. 5.Google Scholar

3. U.S., President, Proclamation, “Coastal Fisheries in Certain Areas of the High Seas, 10 Fed Reg 12304, Sept. 28, 1945. Reprinted and discussed in Allen, , “Fishery Proclamation of 1945”, 45 Am. J. Int. L. 177 (1951)Google Scholar and in Bayitch, S.A., Interamerican Law of Fisheries (New York: Oceana Publications, Inc., 1957), p. 20.Google Scholar

4. For an extensive bibliography in this area and a treatment of some of the early extensions, see Oda, Shigeru, International Control of Sea Resources (Leyden, Netherlands: A.W. Sythoff, 1962).Google Scholar See also, “Limits and Status of the Territorial Sea, Exclusive Fishing Zones, Fishery Conservation Zones and the Continental Shelf”, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 127 (1971).Google Scholar

5. Brown, E.D., “The 1973 Conference on the Law of the Sea: The Consequence of the Failure to Agree”, in The Law of the Sea. A New Geneva Conference. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Conference of the Law of the Sea Institute, University of Rhode Island, June 21–14, 1971, pp. 13–14.Google Scholar

6. Government of Japan, “Working Paper on the Question of Fishery Relating to the Law of the Sea”Google Scholar, (Prepared by the Government of Japan as Member of the Working Group of the AALCC sub-Committee on the Law of the Sea, 06, 1971), p. 15.Google Scholar

7. Jackson, Roy I., “Trends in World Fisheries”, Fishing News International, VI (07, 1967), pp. 20–27.Google Scholar

8. Chapman, W.M., op. cit., p. 8.Google Scholar

9. FAO, “Report on Regulatory Fishery Bodies”, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 138 (1972), pp. 12–13.Google Scholar

10. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2570 C (XXV), para. 2.

11. Ibid., para. 6.

12. See generally. PAO. “Fishery Country Profiles”, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 140 (1971–1973). These profiles are presented on a country-by-country basis.

13. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.15(1971), pp. 20–22.

14. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.7(1971), pp. 7–9.

15. U.N.Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L12(1972); also appears in Report of the Committee on the Peaceful Uses of the Sea-Bed and the Ocean Floor Beyond the Limits of National Jurisdiction, General Assembly Official Records: Twenty-seventh Session, Supplement No. 21, U.N. Doc. A/8721 (1972), p. 188.Google Scholar

16. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.5(1971), pp. 2–4.

17. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.31(1972), pp. 118–120

18. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.27(1972), pp. 2–5. (Poland). U.N. Doc, A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.27(1972), pp. 7–9.

19. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L9(1972); also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 158.Google Scholar

20. FAO. “Fishery Country Profiles-Romania”, op. cit.Google Scholar

21. Ibid.-Poland-Bulgaria.

22. Ibid.-U.S.S.R.

23. U.S.S.R. Draft Article on Fishing, op. cit., Art. 1, para. 3; Art. 4.

24. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.55(1973), pp. 3–8.

25. Rasatura, H.. “International Aspects of the Exploitation of the Living Resources of the Sea”, in Planning and Development in the Oceans, Preparatory Conference on Planning and Development. Pacem in Maribus, Vol. 3 (1971), p. 86.Google Scholar

26. See generally, FAO, Atlas of the Living Resources of the Seas, FAO Fisheries Circular No. 126-Rev. 1 (1972).Google Scholar

27. Government of Japan, “Working Paper on the Question of Fishery Relating to the Law of the Sea”, op. cit., p. 2.Google Scholar

28. FAO, “Fishery Country Profiles-United Kingdom”, op. cit.Google Scholar

29. See, “The Iceland Althing Resolution on Fisheries Jurisdiction”, 02 15, 1972Google Scholar, 11 I.L.M. 643 (1972): “Regulations Concerning the Fishery Limits off Iceland”, 07 14, 1972Google Scholar, 11 I.L.M. 1112, 1972. For Documents pertaining to the proceedings before the World Court, See “International Court of Justice: Fisheries Jurisdiction Case, United Kingdom v. Iceland, 11 I.L.M. 1069(1972).Google Scholar

30. FAO, “Fishery Country Profiles-Faroe Islands”, op.cit.Google Scholar

31. Ibid.-Denmark.

32. Ibid.-Japan.

33. Chapman, W.M., op.cit., pp. 9–34.Google Scholar

34. U.M. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.39(1972), pp. 37–40.

35. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.83(1972), pp. 58–60.

36. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.12(1971), pp. 2–3.

37. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/Sc.II/L11(1972);also appeals in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 183.Google Scholar

38. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.8(1971), pp. 6–8. (Czechoslovakia). U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC. II/SR. 12(1971), pp. 15–17. (Madagascar).

39. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.16(1971), pp. 17–20.

40. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.14(1971), pp. 10–11.

41. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.8(1972); also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 164.Google Scholar

42. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.27(1972), pp. 11–14.

43. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.4(1971); The statement of introduction can be found in U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.8(1971), pp. 2–5.

44. Ibid.

45. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.9(1972); also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 175.Google Scholar

46. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.20(1973).

47. FAO, “Fishery Country Profiles-Australia”, op.cit.Google Scholar

48. Ibid.-New Zealand.

49. Ibid.-Ivory Coast.

50. Ibid.-Sri Lanka.

51. Ibid.-Canada.

52. Ibid.-United States.

53. Bayitch, S.A., op.cit., p. 25.Google Scholar

54. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/80; also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 70.Google Scholar

55. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/79; also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op.cit., p. 73.Google Scholar

56. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.14(1971), pp. 7–9.

57. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.27(1972), pp. 17–19.

58. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.11(1971), pp. 3–5.

59. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.10(1972); also appears in Report; Sea-Bed, op. cit., p. 180.Google Scholar

60. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.83(1972), pp. 66–70.

61. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.27(1972), pp. 14–16.

62. U.N, Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.23(1973).

63. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.42(1972), p. 56.

64. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.16(1971), pp. 13–17.

65. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/L.21(1973).

66. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.58(1973), pp. 13–16. (Venezuela). U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC. II/SR.59(1973), pp. 3–7. (Mexico).

67. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.35(1972), pp. 15–17.

68. U.N. Doc. A/AC.138/SC.II/SR.55(1973), pp. 3–8.