Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T08:50:46.059Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Independent Scholar: Lawrence Moonan's Legacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

Lawrence Moonan (1937–2013) pioneered the study of the medieval Scottish philosopher Lawrence of Lindores; he published a major work on the notion of divine omnipotence in early scholasticism; and he kept worrying that in these post-Deistical times many philosophers and theologians have forgotten what it is like to think of God as strictly infinite.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 The Dominican Council

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Classica et Mediaevalia 27 (1969): 349–374

2 Lindores, Lawrence’ in Oxford Dictionary of National Biography volume 33 (2004): 832–34Google Scholar.

3 Classica et Mediaevalia 38 (1987): 217–66; and 39 (1988): 273–317.

4 Dewender, Thomas, Das Problem des unendlichen im ausgehenden 14, Jahrhundert: Eine Studie mit Textedition zum Physikkommentary des Lorenz von Lindores (Amsterdam 2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; reviewed by Moonan in The Philosophical Quarterly 54 (2004): 625–627.

5 Divine Power: The Mediaeval Power Distinction up to its Adoption by Albert, Bonaventure and Aquinas (Oxford: Clarendon Press 1994)Google Scholar.

6 New Blackfriars 75 (1994): 489–496.

7 My thanks to Lawrence's executors for giving me a copy.

8 The French Oratorian philosopher (1638–1715) whose works Hume no doubt examined during his days in the Jesuit library at La Flèche.

9 ‘All you need is love?’, New Blackfriars, August 1968: 565–571.

10 ‘Sinning and Forgiving Sin’, New Blackfriars, April 1972: 174–180.

11 ‘Agreed Statements: Hazards and Possibilities’ New Blackfriars July 1979: 309–320.

12 ‘Why can't God do everything?’ New Blackfriars December 1974: 552–562.

13 ‘Theodicy and Blissful Freedom’ New Blackfriars November 1999: 502–511.

14 For Frege existence is not a property of individuals but instead a second-order property—a property of concepts.

15 Flew, A., ‘Divine omnipotence and human freedom’, in Flew, Antony & Maclntyre, Alasdair, New Essays in Philosophical Theology (London 1955): 144–69, 159Google Scholar.

16 ‘The Responsibility of Theology for the Question of God’ New Blackfriars January 2000: 2–15.

17 ‘How to hide something properly’ New Blackfriars March 2004: 186–194.

18 ‘A Universe devoid of sentient beings?’ New Blackfriars September 2008: 606–618/

19 ‘So ‘a nothing would serve just as well … ’?’ New Blackfriars May 2013: 358–368,

20 For example, Pre-Surgical Sedation, Montpellier c.1393: Testimony of Lawrence of Lindores’, Medical History 12 (1968): 299301CrossRefGoogle Scholar, displaying his liking for quirky byways of research.

21 Re-tracing the Five Ways of ‘Summa Theologiae’ I.2.3.International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2004): 437450Google Scholar.

22 certo cognosci posse. What precisely did Vatican I define?’, Annuarium Historiae Conciliorum 42 (2010): 193202CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 What Analogy and the Five Ways are meant to do for Aquinas's Summa TheologiaeRivista Medioevo (2013): 971Google Scholar.