Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T16:20:30.416Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Christian Responsibility And Industrial Relations: Reconciliation Or Revolution?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Extract

During the 1979 General Election campaign, industrial relations featured as a prominent issue. Indeed, it might correctly be claimed that the general public in confidently voting in Margaret Thatcher, were voting against the alleged misuse of trade union power. Rising prices, falling standards of living and increasing violence have been popularly attributed to “big unions” striking against each other, against the housewife and against the general public. In a speech only days before the last government fell, Mrs Thatcher outlined the Conservative package to restore stability to Britain’s economic and social order: the statutory inhibiting of trade union activity, the enforcement of law and order, the creation of wealth and the reward of individual success. Such opinion was supported in the press and on television by editorial comment, by criticism of union power from the judiciary, and a former chief of police comparing union power with the Nazi control of Germany in the 1930s. The general election result and subsequent cabinet appointments indicate an important change in British politics. The electorate have voted for a radical change and they have voted for the politics and economics of the right. Characteristically, a society in crisis has opted for regression, the reassertion of old hierarchies, values and judgements, with the hope, in particular, of turning back the menace of union power, which, it is claimed, is a threat to the social order. Such perspectives have become the commonplace explanation of the world and of industrial relations in particular, and they have been clothed in the habit of St Francis of Assisi, setting them in the context of the Christian struggle for peace.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1980 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* See Meaning and Metaphor in Theologv in New, Blackfriars March 1980.

1 Solihul, Saturday 24 March 1979. Conservative Central Office 408/79.

2 Richard Hyman Strikes Fontana 2nd ed 1978.

3 One Dimensional Man Abacus 1972 p. 139.

4 Marcuse op. cit. p. 82.

5 Marcuse op. cit. ch 4.

6 Marcuse op. cit. p. 95.

7 A propos of Lady Chatterley’s Lover in Phoenix Vol 2 Heinemann 1968 p. 508.

8 Standard Edition London 1961 xxi pp. 64-145.

9 On the history of the psychoanalytic movement (1914) in Collected Papers Vol 1 International Psychoanalytical Library 1924 p. 346.

10 Class in a capitalist society Penguin 1976.

11 31 December 1976.

12 Collins 1974.

13 Hyman op. cit. p. 72.

14 Essay on Liberation Penguin 1969 p. 11.

15 To have or to be? Jonathan Cape 1978 pp. 84-5.

16 Goldthorpe et. al. The Affluent Worker CUP 1968 Vol 3 pp. 162-3.

17 Gustave Gutierrez Theology of Liberation SCM p. 8.