Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T22:24:04.116Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Newman and Vatican II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Nicholas Lash
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Original Articles
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 92 , Issue 1038 , March 2011 , pp. 243 - 246
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 The Author. New Blackfriars © 2011 The Dominican Society.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 From the website of the cause for Newman's canonisation.

2 Alberto Melloni, ‘The Beginning of the Second Period: the Great Debate on the Church’, History of Vatican II, edited by Alberigo, Giuseppe, Vol. III. The Mature Council. Second Period and Intersession. September 1963 – September 1964 (Leuven: Peeters, 2000), pp. 1–115; p. 94Google Scholar.

3 Norman Tanner, ‘The Church in the World (Ecclesia ad Extra)’, History of Vatican II, Vol. IV, Church as Communion. Third Period and Intersession. September 1964 – September 1965 (Peeters, 2003), pp. 269–386; p. 288.

4 See Congar, Yves, ‘Sur la Trilogie “Prophète-Roi-Prêtre”’, Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 67 (1983), pp. 97–116Google Scholar; p. 107.

5 Lash, ‘Authors, Authority and Authorization’, p. 61.

6 See L’Écclésiologie au xixe Siècle, Unam Sanctam 34 (Paris: Les Editions du Cerf, 1960), pp. 329–349. The essays in this collection first appeared, earlier the same year, as numbers 2, 3 and 4 of the Revue des Sciences Religieuses.

7 Congar's essay ‘Sur la Trilogie’ reviews L. Schick, Das Dreifache Amt Christi und der Kirche (Europäische Hochschulschriften, Reihe XXIII Théologie. Bd 171), published in Frankfurt by Peter Lang in 1982. See Bertulf van Leeuwen's essay on ‘La Participation à la Fonction Prophétique du Christ’, in L’Église de Vatican II, Unam Sanctam 51, edited Guilherme Baraúna, French edition directed by Congar (Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 1966), pp. 425–455.

8 He speaks of Newman ‘apportioning’ the offices ‘among different classes (theologians, devout laity, and popes)’: Avery Dulles, ‘The Threefold Office in Newman's Ecclesiology’, Newman after a Hundred Years, edited Ker, Ian and Hill, Alan (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 375–399; p. 397Google Scholar.

9 Dulles, ‘The Threefold Office’, p. 397.

10 Marin-Sola, F., L’Évolution Homogène du Dogme Catholique, 2 vols (Fribourg, 1924)Google Scholar.

11 ‘Le théologien moderne qui a eu la plus claire vision de l’existence du progrès dogmatique’ (Marin-Sola, Vol. I, p. 310).

12 Chadwick, Owen, From Bossuet to Newman. The Idea of Doctrinal Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 1957, p. 97Google Scholar.

13 See Lash, Nicholas, Newman on Development (London: Sheed and Ward, 1975), p. 153Google Scholar.

14 Butler, B. C., ‘Newman and the Second Vatican Council’, The Rediscovery of Newman. An Oxford Symposium, edited Coulson, John and Allchin, A. M. (London: Sheed and Ward, 1967), pp. 244–5Google Scholar.