Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T14:24:05.555Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preparing the Way for the Lord: Evolution, Christianity and the Dialogue on Moral Freedom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Alain J‐P.C. Tschudin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Presupposing that science and religion can share dialogue, can this be informative and come to bear fruit in the future? As a Catholic Christian who studies social evolution and Christian ethics, I shall answer “yes”, notwithstanding the challenge mounted by conflicts inherent in this debate. My interest lies in the dialogue between Christian moral philosophy and the theory of Darwinian evolution, as first published in On the Origin of Species (1859). The information flow arising out of a shared understanding of knowledge from these disciplines may be mutually beneficial. By contextualizing Jesus within evolutionary history, I shall argue that evolutionary theory can inform the Christian conception of human nature in relation to the world and equally, that Christian thinking can contribute to the ethics of scientific and secular engagements with the world. Despite the continued confrontation between science and religion, I hope to negotiate some of the impasses so as to trace a path towards conflict resolution and reconciliation.

Early on, Creationism impeded the improvement of relations between science and religion. Creationists (they are not yet extinct!) support a literalist reading of Creation as described in Genesis. In short, they hold that God, from intelligent design, created all species separately. Hence, for Creationists there is no genetic relatedness between species and no need to invoke evolution as an explanation for life on Earth. Yet, thanks to Darwin, the theory of natural selection radically undermined the notion of intelligent design—and with it the pre-evolutionary alternative of life as an outcome of random physical processes.

Type
Original Article
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 84 , Issue 993 , November 2003 , pp. 521 - 527
Copyright
Copyright © 2003 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . (1976). The Ethics of Aristotle: the Nicomachean ethics. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
StAquinas, T. (1970). Summa Theologiae. London: Blackriars.Google Scholar
Bowler, P. J. (1989). Evolution: The History of an Idea. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. & Whiten, A. (Eds). (1988). Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertiese and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes and humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. R. (1959). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. (1982). The Extended Phenotype: The Gene as the Unit of Selection. Oxford: Oxford university Press.Google Scholar
Dostoevsky, F. (1996). The Idiot. Ware: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
Haight, R. (1999). Jesus, Symbol of God. Maryknooll, N. Y. Orbis Books.Google Scholar
Humphrey, N. K. (1976). The social function of intellect. in (Bateson, P.P.G. & Kinde, R. A., Eds.) Growing Points in Ethology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, F. (1987). Charity as friendship. in (Davies, B., Ed.) Language, Meaning and God: Essays in Honour of Herbert McCabe. London: Geoffrey Chapman.Google Scholar
McCabe, H. (1987). God Matters. London: Geoffrey Chapman.Google Scholar
Moltmann, J. (1973). Theology and Joy. (Translated by Ulrich, R.). London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. (1991). When Faith and Reason Clash: Evolution and the Bible. Christian Scholar's Review, 21(1): 8–32.Google Scholar
Plato, . (1951). The Symposium. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rose, S. (1978). Pre‐Copernican Sociobiology New Scientist, 80: 45–46.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. (2001). Can a Darwinian be a Christian?: The Relationship Between Science aqnd Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schillebeeckx, E. (1979). Jesus: An Experiment in Christology. Collins: London.Google Scholar
Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
de Waal, F. B. M. (1989). Peacemaking Among Primates. London: Penguin.10.4159/9780674033085CrossRefGoogle Scholar