No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Christ as Second Adam: Girardian Mimesis Redeemed
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
Analysis of several chapters of the book of Genesis beginning with the Fall in chapter three reveals a consistent theme which is well-interpreted by René Girard's concept of mimetic rivalry. This mimetic rivalry can be considered one manifestation of original sin which has been perpetuated generationally since its inception with the First Adam. Since a number of scholars, including James D.G. Dunn, have identified Phil 2:6–11 as a key piece of Second Adam Christology, I examine this pericope for clues to a remedy for mimetic rivalry. Christ's kenosis and humiliation—his self-emptying and choice not to seek after self-glorification—become the cornerstones to a counter-program which redeems mimesis. Christ is the Second Adam who fulfills through his obedience the failed role of the First Adam. One facet of Christ's overall redemption is to establish himself as the perfect Girardian ‘model’—one whose imitation leads not to violent rivalry but ever-increasing humble charity.
- Type
- Original Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- © 2011 The Author. New Blackfriars © 2011 The Dominican Council
References
Alison, James. The Joy of Being Wrong: Original Sin Through Easter Eyes. New York: Crossroad Publishing, 1998.Google Scholar
Burk, Denny. On the Articular Infinitive in Philippians 2:6: A Grammatical Note with Christological Implications. Tyndale Bulletin 55 (2004): 253–74.10.53751/001c.29176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dadosky, John A. Reconceiving the Immaculate Conception. Theological Studies 72, no. 1 (March 2011): 15–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, James D.G. Christology in the Making. Philadelphia, PA: Westminster Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Deceit, Desire and the Novel: Self and Other in Literary Structure. Translated by Freccero, Yvonne. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Girard, René. I See Satan Fall Like Lightning. Translated by Williams, James G.. Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 2001.Google Scholar
Girard, René. Violence and the Sacred. Translated by Gregory, Patrick. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goergen, Donald OP. Jesus, Son of God, Son of Mary, Immanuel. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock, 1995.Google Scholar
Kittel, Gerhard. ed. Theological Dictionary of the New Testament. Vol. 3. Translated by Bromiley, Geoffrey. 1965. Reprint, Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing, 1977.Google Scholar
Maly, Eugene H. Genesis.” In The Jerome Biblical Commentary, edited by Raymond, E. Brown, Ss, Joseph, A. Fitzmeyer, Sj, and Roland, E. Murphy, O.Carm., 7–46. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1968.Google Scholar
Ratzinger, Joseph (Pope Benedict XVI). Jesus of Nazareth: Part Two, Holy Week From the Entrance into Jerusalem to the Resurrection. Translated by Whitmore, Philip J.. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Sailhamer, John H. Genesis.” In The Expositor's Bible Commentary Vol. 2. Edited by Gaebelein, Frank E.. Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1990.Google Scholar
Schwager, Raymund SJ. Banished from Eden: Original Sin and Evolutionary Theory in the Drama of Salvation. Translated by Williams, James G.. Herefordshire, England: Inigo Enterprises, 2006.Google Scholar
Senior, Donald and Collins, John J., eds. The Catholic Study Bible. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Speiser, E.A. Genesis. Vol. 1 of The Anchor Bible Series. Edited by Albright, William F. and Freedman, David N.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, 1964.Google Scholar
Steinmair-Pösel, Petra. Original Sin, Grace, and Positive Mimesis. Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 14 (2007): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar