No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The Christological Prudence of the Natural Slave
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 January 2024
Abstract
The account of prudence found in Aquinas's Summa Theologiae and the Commentary on the Nicomachean Ethics is bound up with his endorsement of Aristotle's notion of the Natural Slave in his Commentary on Aristotle's Politics. This connection not only hobbles his account of the virtue of prudence, but also weakens other areas of his theology, including his account of providence. A creative rereading of Aquinas's biblical commentaries, however, affords Aquinas the opportunity to correct himself. Aquinas's commentaries on Paul, especially the Commentary on Philippians, provide ample resources for doing so. The Christ hymn of Philippians 2:5-11 forms the cornerstone of a thoroughly Christological, even Apocalyptic, account of prudence, which overcomes the tensions in Aquinas's account of prudence resulting from his endorsement of natural slavery. This scriptural reformulation of prudence heightens the stress on exemplification even further and in so doing makes its exercise more conducive to peaceableness. Due to the political dimensions of prudence, these shifts have an ecclesiological dimension that reveals Aquinas's affinity with Giorgio Agamben's philosophical account of mendicant life.
Keywords
- Type
- Original Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2019 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers
References
1 I am grateful to Gene Rogers for his insightful comments on this paper and for encouraging me to publish it.
2 Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Litzinger, C. I., OP (Notre Dame, IN: Dumb Ox Books, 1993)Google Scholar. All further citations will be in the body of the text. See also Summa Theologiae II-II.47.2.
3 Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, trans. Rackham, H., (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1926).Google Scholar All other citations will be in the body of the text.
4 For this point, see Rackham's note d on Nicomachean Ethics VI.viii.2.
5 Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Aristotle's Politics, trans. J., Richard Regan, SJ, (Indianopolis, IN: Hackett Publishing, 2007), 21.Google Scholar All other citations will be in the body of the text.
6 MacIntyre, Alasdair, Ethics in the Conflicts of Modernity: An Essay on Desire, Practical Reasoning, and Narrative, (Cambridge: Cambridge Unviersity Press, 2016), 88.Google Scholar
7 Eugene F. Rogers, Jr., Aquinas and the Supreme Court: Race, Gender, and the Failure of Natural Law in Aquinas's Biblical Commentaries, (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2013), 11.Google Scholar
8 Aquinas, Thomas, Commentaries on St. Paul's Epistles to Timothy, Titus, and Philemon, trans. Baer, Chrysostom, Praemon, O.., (Notre Dame, IN: St. Augustine's Press, 2004).Google Scholar ‘Commentary on Philemon,’ Preface.
9 Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on St. Paul's First Letter to the Thessalonians and Letter to the Philippians, trans. Larcher, F. R. and Duffy, Michael, (Albany, NY: Magi Books, 1969).Google Scholar All other citations will be in the body of the text.
10 This virtue, of Stoic origins, enters the Christian tradition via Ambrose's De Officiis.
11 Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on Colossians, trans. Larcher, Fabian O.P., (Ave Maria, FL: Sapentia Press, 2009),Google Scholar Lecture 3-1.145. All other citations will be in the body of the text.
12 Williams, Bernard, ‘Politics and Moral Character’ in Public and Private Morality, ed. Hampshire, Stuart, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978), 73.Google Scholar
13 Agamben, Giorgio, The Highest Poverty: Monastic Rules and Form-of-Life, trans. Kostko, Adam, (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
14 Agamben, Highest Poverty, 82.
15 Burrell, David B., CSC, Aquinas: God and Action, (Scranton: Scranton University Press, 2008), 136-162.Google Scholar