Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-29T17:38:29.418Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychoanalysis and Religion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2024

Extract

What will happen to him if he is psychoanalysed? Will he lose his moral and religious convictions? Will he remain faithful to his previous commitments ? Will he still be Paul, Peter or John as we knew him before? These are the questions asked by friends and relatives of the person undergoing an analysis. Whether it is the doctor, the friend, the husband or wife, the parents, the spiritual director or religious superior, everyone has the feeling that from now on the person being analysed will escape them in some way and that he will enter the domain of a secret and mysterious power of which they have not the key … and that with a bit of luck he could become a balanced individual!

This desire to know ‘what it’s all about’ is all the more ardent because psychoanalysis does not fall into the usual categories of medicine. With medicine, the moralist and the believer consider that they can keep within their own domain: the doctor is concerned with curing the body and eliminating suffering; the Christian is concerned with judging moral conduct and speaking on the meaning of suffering. But with psychoanalysis, these yardsticks are of no use, so the argument goes, because the whole personality of the individual is radically questioned.

This uncertainty is inevitable. Indeed, psychoanalysis will be dead on the day that it is put to the service of some institution whether it be educational, economic, political or religious. It is concerned with something else: a truth which goes beyond the analyst and the analysed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1973 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Translated by David Murphy, S.J. The French version appeared in Médecine de l'Homme, Numéro 14, avril 1969.

References

page 198 note 1 ‘Language is not an instrument intended to enunciate what is, but to express what does not satisfy man and to formulate what he desires; its content is not made up of what is, but of what is not.’ Weil, E., Logique de la philosophie, Vrin, 1950, p. 8Google Scholar.

page 200 note 1 Such a technique orders works like Les Siquestré d'Altona and even La Chute, magnificent pleadings before an imaginary tribunal.