Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-18T12:58:02.735Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas D. Sullivan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
New Blackfriars , Volume 80 , Issue 938 , April 1999 , pp. 202 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Etienne, Gilson, The Christian Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas, translated by L.K. Shook, equivalent of the 5th and last French edition, (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1956), p. 22Google Scholar.

2 Mark Jordan, ‘Neo-Thomism,’ in Ted Honderich, ed., The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. 615.

3 J.J.C. Smart and J.J. Haldane, Atheism and Theism (Oxford: Blackwell, 1996), 132.

4 Aquinas, for example, claims it is evident that ‘every whole is greater than its parts’ Analysts mindful of Galileo and Cantor will spontaneously ask whether Aquinas means to include infinite sets.