Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-k7p5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-09T17:27:57.037Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vatican II on the Church and Ecumenism: An Anglican Comment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Extract

The promulgation at the third session of the Second Vatican Council of the three Constitutions De Ecclesia, De Oecumenismo and De Ecclesiis Orientalibus Catholicis is clearly an event of outstanding ecumenical importance, though its full significance will clearly appear only in the light of future thought and acitivity. Anything like a detailed consideration of the contents of the Constitutions would be quite impossible in the space at my disposal, but I hope that the comments which I shall make from an Anglican standpoint on some of the more striking characteristics of the first two may be of some interest and even perhaps of some usefulness to the readers of New Blackfriars.

To begin with De Ecclesia. In spite of the vicissitudes through which the Constitution has passed since the introduction of the original schema on November 30th, 1962 (and for information about this I am indebted to the extremely illuminating article by Père G. Dejaifve, S.J., in the Nouve/le Revue Théologique of January 1965), the overall impression which one receives is that of a remarkably systematic, comprehensive and unified document; only one section, which I shall refer to in more detail later, bears some visible marks of a clash of views which reached something less than full reconciliation. Most impressive of all is the way in which the presentation of the doctrine of the Church in primarily juridical and governmental terms which has characterized most Roman Catholic documents and treatises in the past has been completely superseded by an approach which is in the fullest sense biblical and theological.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1965 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1

Fr Dejaifve remarks that the original schema read, not ‘subsists in’, but simply ‘is’. The change may be significant.

2

art. cit., p. 12

3

Cf K. Rahner, The Episcopate and the Primacy

4

Cf my Recovery of Unity, p. 221

5

Adorario. The terms lama and hyperdulia are not used

6

Cf. the remarkable permission in De Ecclesiis Orienralibus Catholicis for Catholic and ‘separated’ Eastern Christians to receive the sacraments of Penance, Communion and Unction from each other's priests (para 27): in cases of necessity ‘as often as need or true spiritual benefit requires‘.

7

Thus, although I have for convenience called all three documents Constitutions, the official title of De Ecclesia is Constitutio Dogmatica and of the other two simply Decretum. The document on Liturgy was simply called Constitutio. Yet all of them contain doctrinal material