Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-10T09:31:53.212Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Alevis in Germany and the Politics of Recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Martin Sökefeld
Martin Sökefeld*
Affiliation:
Institute of Social and Cultural Anthropology, University of Hamburg.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Migration has been among the most decisive influences shaping contemporary German society, deeply influencing not only economics and demography but also societal discourse and political practice. Legal issues concerning foreigners and immigration have been hotly debated in German society and have played a central role in many elections at both federal and provincial levels. Recognition is an issue at the heart of these concerns. How are migrants viewed in Germany, as “immigrants” or as “foreigners”? As individuals who form a legitimate part of German society, or who have overstayed their temporary “invitation”? Who contribute to the economy and to public welfare, and or who live at the expense of German society? Who are essentially alien to German society and can at best achieve a liminal state of betweenness, or who actively and self-consciously assume a diversity of positions at all levels of society?

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 29: Special Issue: Forty Years of Turkish Migration to Germany , Spring-Fall 2003 , pp. 133 - 161
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AABF. 2000. Das neue Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht/Yeni Vatandaşlık Yasası. Cologne: Almanya Alevi Birlikleri Federasyonu. No date. Sivas Şehitlerini Anma Günü. No publishing information.Google Scholar
Aksoy, Asu and Robins, Kevin. 2000. “Thinking across Spaces: Transnational Television From Turkey,” European Journal of Cultural Studies, 3, pp. 343–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aksoy, Asu and Robins, Kevin. 2002. “Banal Transnationalism: The Difference That Television Makes,” Transnational Communities Working Paper WPTC-02-08, available online at: http://www.transcomm.ox.ac.uk..Google Scholar
Baumann, Gerd. 1999. The Multicultural Riddle: Rethinking National, Ethnic and Religious Identities. Routledge: London.Google Scholar
Beauftragte der Bundesregierung für Ausländerfragen. 2002. Daten und Fakten zur Ausländersituation. Berlin.Google Scholar
Becker, Jörg and Behnisch, Reinhard (Eds.). 2001. Zwischen Abgrenzung und Integration. Türkische Medienkultur in Deutschland. Loccum: Evangelische Akademie.Google Scholar
Bhabha, Homi. 1994. The Location of Culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Community. 2001. 2001 Regular Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: Commission of the European Community.Google Scholar
Commission of the European Community. 2002. 2002 Regular Report on Turkey's Progress Towards Accession. Brussels: Commission of the European Community.Google Scholar
Çağlar, Ayşe. 1997. “Hyphenated Identities and the Limits of ‘Culture,’” in Modood, Tariq and Werbner, Pnina (Eds.), The Politics of Multiculturalism in the New Europe. London: Zed Books, pp. 169–185.Google Scholar
Dressler, Markus. 2002. Die Alevitische Religion. Traditionslinien und Neubestimmungen. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
Faist, Thomas (Ed.). 2000. Transstaatliche Räume: Politik, Wirtschaft und Kultur zwischen Deutschland und der Türkei. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1997. “Anerkennungskämpfe im demokratischen Rechtsstaat,” in Taylor, Charles, Multikulturalismus und die Politik der Anerkennung. Frankfurt: Fischer, pp. 147–196.Google Scholar
Hamburg Alevi Kültür Merkezi. 1999. Onların Öyküsü. Hamburg: Hamburg Alevi Kültür Merkezi.Google Scholar
Handler, Richard. 1988. Nationalism and the Politics of Culture in Quebec. Madison: U. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Jamin, Mathilde. 1999. “Fremde Heimat: Zur Geschichte der Arbeitsmigration aus der Türkei,” in Motte, Jan, Ohliger, Rainer and Oswald, Anne von (Eds.), 50 Jahre Bundesrepublik, 50 Jahre Einwanderung. Nachkriegsgeschichte als Migrationsgeschichte. Frankfurt: Campus, pp. 145–164.Google Scholar
Jongerden, Joost. 2003. “Violation of Human Rights and the Alevis in Turkey,” in White, Paul J. and Jongerden, Joost (Eds.), Turkey's Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview. Leiden: Brill, pp. 71–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joppke, Christian. 1999. Immigration and the Nation-State: The United States, Germany and Great Britain. Oxford: Oxford U. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaleli, Lütfi. 1997. Kimliğini Haykıran Alevilik, Istanbul: Can Yayınları.Google Scholar
Karakaşoğlu-Aydın, Yasemin. 1999. “Eine Analyse der Reaktionen auf den ‘Fall Ludin’ in der politischen und Medienöffentlichkeit,” in Jonker, Gerdien (Ed.), Kern und Rand. Religiöse Minderheiten aus der Türkei in Deutschland. Berlin: Das Arabische Buch, pp. 169–186.Google Scholar
Karakaşoğlu-Aydın, Yasemin. 2001. ‘’Unsere Leute sind nicht so’ - Alevitische und sunnitische Studentinnen in Deutschland,” in Pusch, Barbara (Ed.), Die neue muslimische Frau. Ergon Verlag: Würzburg, pp. 295–322.Google Scholar
Kehl-Bodrogi, Krisztina. 1992. “Vom revolutionären Klassenkampf zum ‘wahren’ Islam. Transformationsprozesse im Alevitentum der Türkei nach 1980,” Sozialanthropologische Arbeitspapiere, 49. Berlin: Verlag Das Arabische Buch.Google Scholar
Kehl-Bodrogi, Krisztina. 1993. “Die ‘Wiederfindung’ des Alevitentums in der Türkei: Geschichtsmythos und kollektive Identität,” Orient, 34, pp. 267–282.Google Scholar
Kostakopoulou, Theodora. 2001. Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester U. Press.Google Scholar
Künzler, Eva. 1999. Zum westlichen Frauenbild von Musliminnen. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford U. Press.Google Scholar
Malkki, Liisa. 1997. “National Geographic: The Rooting of Peoples and the Territorialization of National Identity among Scholars and Refugees,” in Gupta, Akhil and Ferguson, James (Eds.), Culture, Power, Place: Explorations in Critical Anthropology. Durham: Duke U. Press, pp. 52–74.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ruth. 1989. “Turkish Headscarves and the ‘Foreigner Problem’: Constructing Difference Through Emblems of Identity,” New German Critique, 46, pp. 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mıhçıyazgan, Ursula. 1990. Moscheen türkischer Muslime in Hamburg. Hamburg: Behörde für Arbeit, Gesundheit und Soziales.Google Scholar
Nökel, Sigrid. 1999. “Islam und Selbstbehauptung - Alltagsweltliche Strategien junger Frauen in Deutschland,” in Klein Hessling, Ruth, Nökel, Sigrid and Werner, Karin (Eds.), Der neue Islam der Frauen. Weibliche Lebenspraxis in der globalisierten Moderne - Fallstudien aus Afrika, Asien und Europa. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 124–146.Google Scholar
Özcan, Ertekin. 1992. Türkische Immigrantenorganisationen in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Berlin: Hitit.Google Scholar
Pinn, Irmgard and Wehner, Marlies. 1995. EuroPhantasien. Die islamische Frau auswestlicher Sicht. Duisburg: DISS.Google Scholar
Pries, Ludger (Ed.). 1997. Transnationale Migration. Baden Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Sauer, Martina. 2001. “Die Einbürgerung türkischer Migranten in Deutschland. Befragung zu Einbürgerungsabsichten und dem Für und Wider der Einbürgerung,” in Goldberg, Andreas and Halm, Dirk (Eds.), Migrationsbericht des Zentrums für Türkeistudien 2002. Münster: Lit, pp. 165–228.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Webb, Emma. 1999. “Pilgrimage, Politics and Folklore: The Making of Alevi Community,” Les Annales de l’Autre Islam, 6, pp. 259–274.Google Scholar
Sinclair-Webb, Emma. 2003. “Sectarian Violence, the Alevi Minority and the Left: Kahramanmaraş 1978,” in White, Paul J. and Jongerden, Joost (Eds.), Turkey's Alevi Enigma: A Comprehensive Overview. Leiden: Brill, pp. 215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoğlu. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago: U. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoğlu. 1996. “Changing Citizenship in Europe: Remarks on Postnational Membership and the Nation-State,” in Cesarani, David and Fullbrook, Mary (Eds.), Citizenship, Nationality and Migration in Europe. London: Routledge, pp. 17–29.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2002a. “Alevi Dedes in the German Diaspora: The Transformation of a Religious Institution,” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, 127, pp. 163–186.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. 2002b. “Über die Schwierigkeit, dem türkischen Nationaldiskurs zu entkommen: Aleviten in Deutschland und ‘Hürriyet.’” Unpublished Paper.Google Scholar
Sökefeld, Martin. In press. “Religion or Culture? Concepts of Identity in the Alevi Diaspora,” in Kokot, Waltraud, Tòlólyan, Khachig, and Alfonso, Carolin (Eds.), Locality, Identity, Diaspora. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition,” in Gutman, Amy (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition. Princeton: Princeton U. Press, pp. 25–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tosun, Halis. 2002. Alevi Kimliğiyle Yaşamak, Istanbul: Can Yayınları.Google Scholar
Vorhoff, Karin. 1995. Zwischen Glaube, Nation und neuer Gemeinschaft. Alevitischeidentität in der Türkei. Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag.Google Scholar
Vorhoff, Karin. 1998. ‘“Let's Reclaim Our History and Culture!’ Imagining Alevi Community in Contemporary Turkey,” Die Welt des Islams, 38, pp. 220–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiss, Hans-Jürgen and Trebbe, Joachim. 2001. Mediennutzung und Integration der türkischen Bevölkerung in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage des Presse-und Informationsamtes der Bundesregierung. Potsdam: GöfaK Medienforschung.Google Scholar
Wilamowits-Moellendorff, Ulrich. 2002. Türken in Deutschland - Einstellungen zu Staatund Gesellschaft. Arbeitspapier. St. Augustin: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2002. Nationalist Exclusion and Ethnic Conflict: Shadows of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge U. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas and Schiller, Nina Glick. 2002. “Methodological Nationalism and Beyond: Nation-State Building, Migration and the Social Sciences,” Global Networks, 2, pp. 301–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelyut, Rıza. 1990. Öz Kaynaklarına Göre Alevilik, Istanbul: Anadolu Kültürü Yayınları.Google Scholar