Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T23:06:21.834Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Constitutional Patriotism in Lebanon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Maurus Reinkowski
Maurus Reinkowski*
Affiliation:
Orient-Institut of the Deutsche Morgenländische Gesellschaft branch, Istanbul
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper I will discuss the options of political identity the Lebanese have at their disposal against the background of the German experience. Germany and Lebanon, states at first glance completely different from each other, show some similarity in their historical experience. In the context of this comparison I will discuss constitutional patriotism, a political concept in circulation in Germany over the last fifteen years or so, and its potential application in the Lebanese case. Constitutional patriotism, unlike many other concepts originating in the West, has yet not entered the political vocabulary of the Middle East. The debate on democracy and the civil society is widespread in the whole of the Middle East, including Lebanon. Lebanon's political culture, polity and national identity, however, show some peculiar traits that might justify the introduction of the term constitutional patriotism into the Lebanese political debate.

Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 16 , Spring 1997 , pp. 63 - 85
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Azmeh, Aziz al-. 1995. “Populism Contra Democracy: Recent Democratist Discourse in the Arab World”, in Norton, A. R. (ed.), Civil Society in the Middle East. Leiden, vol. 1, pp. 112–129.Google Scholar
Bahout, Joseph. 1996. “Lebanese Parliamentarians: Shadow Plays and the Death of Politics”, The Lebanon Report, vol. 1, pp. 27–31.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1989. “American Exceptionalism Revisited: The Role of Civil Society”, Public Interest, vol. 95, pp. 38–56.Google Scholar
Beydoun, Ahmed. 1984. Identité confessionelle et temps social chez les historiens libanais contemporains. Beirut.Google Scholar
Beydoun, Ahmed. 1994. “L'identité des Libanais”, in Kiwan, F. (ed.), Le Liban aujourd'hui. Paris, pp. 13–30.Google Scholar
Beyhum, Nabil. 1991. “Les paris sur le possible”, in Reconstruire Beyrouth. Les paris sur le possible. Lyon, pp. 13–65.Google Scholar
Centre for Arab Unity Studies (Markaz dirasat al-wahda al-arabiya). 1991. Lubnan wa-afaq al-mustaqbal. Beirut.Google Scholar
Frangié, Samir. 1991. “L'exigence de la société civile”, Les Cahiers de l'Orient, vol. 21/22, pp. 87–97.Google Scholar
Frangié, Samir. 1995. “Al-Ma'raka ar-ri'asiya al-ahira: muraja'a awwaliya [The lastest presidential struggle - a first inspection.]”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 5.Google Scholar
Frangié, Samir. 1996. “As-Sinudus wa-f adat ta'hil al-masihiyin (The Synode and the rehabilitation of the Christians)”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 10.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1983. Nations and Nationalism. New York.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1991. “Civil Society in Historical Context”, International Social Science Journal, vol. 129, pp. 495–510.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1987. Eine Art Schadensabwicklung. Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates. Frankfurt a.M.Google Scholar
Hanf, Theodor. 1993. Coexistence in Wartime Lebanon. Decline of a State and Rise of a Nation. London.Google Scholar
Hudson, Michael. 1988. “The Problem of Authoritative Power in Lebanese Politics. Why Consociationalism Failed”, in Shehadi, N.; Mills, D.H. (eds.), Lebanon: a History of Conflict and Consensus. London.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1993a. “Democracy's Third Wave”, in Diamond, L.; Plattner, M.F. (eds.), The Global Resurgence of Democracy. Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1993b. “The Clash of Civilizations”, Foreign Affairs, Summer, pp. 22–49.Google Scholar
Ibrahim, Saad Eddin. 1995. “Civil Society and Prospects of Democratization in the Arab World”, in Norton, A. (ed.), Civil Society in the Middle East. Leiden, vol. 1, pp. 27–54.Google Scholar
Kabbara, Nawaf. 1991. “Critique of the Lebanese Theory of Consociational Democracy”, in Reconstruire Beyrouth. Les paris sulle possible. Lyon, pp. 345–360.Google Scholar
Khalaf, Samir. 1993. “Urban Design and the Recovery of Beirut”, in Khalaf, S. and Khoury, P.S. (eds.), Recovering Beirut. Leiden, pp. 11–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khashan, Hilal. 1992. Inside the Lebanese Confessional Mind. Lanham, Maryland.Google Scholar
Krämer, Gudrun. 1992. “Staat und Zivilgesellschaft im Nahen und Mittleren Osten. Das Beispiel Ägyptens”, in Gormsen, E.; Thimm, A. (eds.), Zivilgesellschaft und Staat in der Dritten Welt. Mainz, pp. 115–137.Google Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies. A Comparative Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar
Maïla, Joseph. 1989. “Liban - les réformes constitutionelles“, Les Cahiers de l'Orient, vol. 10.2, pp. 11–33.Google Scholar
Maïla, Joseph. 1991. “La reconstruction comme opinion publique et comme représentation symbolique (essai des synthèse)”, in Reconstruire Beyrouth: Les paris sur le possible. 1991, pp. 361–372.Google Scholar
Mawla, Sa'ud al-. 1995. “Kalimat al-muslimin al-lubnaniyin amama as-sinudus (Speeches of the Lebanese Muslims before the Synode)”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 8.Google Scholar
Muslih, Muhammed. 1995. “Palestinian Civil Society”, in Norton, A. (ed.), Civil Society in the Middle East. Leiden, vol. 1, pp. 243–268.Google Scholar
Norton, Augustus (ed.). 1995. Civil Society in the Middle East. Leiden, vol. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Permanent Council for Lebanese Dialogue (al-mu'tamar ad-da'im li-1-hiwar al-lubnani). 1995. “Muntalaqat fi n-nazar ila ma'na Lubnan (Some aspects of the meaning of Lebanon)”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 7.Google Scholar
Perthes, Volker. 1994. Der Libanon nach dem Bürgerkrieg. Von Ta'if zum gesellschaftlichen Konsens? Baden-Baden.Google Scholar
Perthes, Volker. 1995. “Wie definiert man eine Nation? Identitätssuche und Staatsaufbau im Libanon”, Informationsprojekt Naher und Mittlerer Osten, vol. 2, pp. 9–13.Google Scholar
Salam, Nawaf. 1994. “Individu et citoyen au Liban”, in Kiwan, F. (ed.), Le Liban aujourd'hui. Paris, pp. 137–150.Google Scholar
Salamé, Ghassan. 1994. “Small is Pluralistic: Democracy as an Instrument of Civil Peace”, in Salame, G. (ed.), Democracy Without Democrats? The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World. London, pp. 84–111.Google Scholar
Salibi, Kemal. 1988. A House of Many Mansions. The History of Lebanon Reconsidered. London.Google Scholar
Sammak, Muhammad as-. 1995. “Kalimat al-muslimin al-lubnaniyin amama as-sinudus—min kalimat as-sayyid M. as-Sammak bi-ism Dar al-Fatwa (Speeches of the Lebanese Muslims before the Synode—from the speech of Muhammad as-Sammak in the name of the Dar al-Fatwa)”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 8.Google Scholar
Seligman, Adam. 1992. The Idea of Civil Society. New York.Google Scholar
Shamsaddin, Muhammed. 1995. “Al-Istiqlal al-lubnani —ba'th da'im 'an al-wahda ad-dahiliya (Lebanese independence—the constant search for inner unity)”, Awraq al-hiwar, vol. 7.Google Scholar
Shils, Edward. 1991. “The Virtues of Civil Society,” Government and Opposition, vol. 26.2, pp. 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberger, Dolf. 1982. Verfassungspatriotismus. Hanover.Google Scholar
Taqiaddin, Sulayman. 1995. “inhitat ad-dimuqratiya al-lubnaniya wa-darurat tajdidiha (The Decline of Lebanese Democracy and the Necessity of Its Renewal)”, an-Nahar, March 23, p. 13.Google Scholar
Thamer, Hans-Ulrich. 1986. Verführung und Gewalt: Deutschland 1933-1945. Berlin.Google Scholar
Waterbury, John. 1994. “Democracy Without Democrats? The Po¬tential for Political Liberalization in the Middle East”, in Salamé, G. (ed.), Democracy Without Democrats? The Renewal of Politics in the Muslim World. London, pp. 23–47.Google Scholar
Wendt, Bernd. 1992. “‘Sonderweg’ oder ‘Sonderbewußtsein’? Über eine Leitkategorie der deutschen Geschichte im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert”, in Wendt, B.et al. (eds.), Vom schwierigen Zusammenwachsen der Deutschen. Frankfurt a.M., pp. 111–141.Google Scholar