Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T05:13:05.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Markets and Fields: An Ethnography of Cotton Production and Exchange in a Turkish Village

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Koray Çalışkan
Koray Çalışkan*
Affiliation:
Boğaziçi University, Department of Political Science and International Relations, Bebek, İstanbul, koray.caliskan@boun.edu.tr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

How do farmers explain their engagement with commodity production and the market? This article describes the universe of cotton production and exchange in a Turkish village. Building on the scholarship concerning the anthropology of markets, I offer an account of the power relations concerning exchange in the countryside whereby a cluster of agents interact in multiple ways. Describing the microcosm of cotton production and exchange as it is perceived by farmers in the largest cotton-producing village of the Söke Plain in western Turkey, the essay documents how farmers mobilize resources, interact with agricultural workers, find credit, and finally sell their product. Farmers see the market and their fields as interconnected geographies of struggle between various actors. In contrast to the cotton field where they perceive themselves as active and formative agents in the rural political economic universe, cotton growers understand the market as a location of encounter dominated by traders and controlled by various mercantile tools that weaken their agency. The market is neither only a place where the price is set, nor merely a location of commodity exchange. It is a power field where farmers encounter the “production” of price as relatively passive agents of trade.

Keywords

Turkeyagriculturemarketscottonexchange relationsfarmerstradersagricultural workersprices
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 37 , Fall 2007 , pp. 115 - 145
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdel-Aal, Mohamed, and Reem, Saad. New Egyptian Land Reform. Cairo: The American University in Cairo, 1999.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jennifer, and Alexander, Paul. “What Is in a Fair Price? Price Setting and Trading Partnership in Javanese Markets.” Man 26, no. 3 (1991): 493–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arensberg, Conrad. “Anthropology as History.” In Trade and Markets in the Early Empires: Economies in History and Theory, edited by Polanyi, Karl, Arensberg, Conrad and Pearson, Harry W., 97–113. New York: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Aydın, Zülküf. Torım ve Köylülük: Toplum ve Bilim Özel Sayı. İstanbul: Birikim Yayınları, 2001.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Henry. Capital and Peasantry in the Epoch of Imperialism, Occasional Paper - Economic Research Bureau, University of Dar Es Salaam; No. 77.2. Dar es Salaam: University of Dar es Salaam, 1977.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Henry, Brass, Tom, and Byres, T. J.. The Journal of Peasant Studies: A Twenty Volume Index, 1973–1993. Portland: Frank Cass, 1994.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Paul, and Dalton, George. Markets in Africa: Eight Subsistence Economies in Transition. A New Selection, The Natural History Library; N39. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, Koray. “Neoliberal Piyasa Nasıl İşler? Pamuk, İktidar ve Ticaret Siyaseti.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 108 (2007): 52–811.Google Scholar
Çalışkan, Koray, “Organism and Triangle: A Short History of Labor Law in Turkey (1920–1950).” New Perspectives on Turkey, no. 15 (1996): 95–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çalışkan, Koray, “Price as a Market Device: Cotton Trading in İzmir Mercantile Exchange.” In Market Devices, edited by Callon, M, Millo, Y. and Muniesa, F.. London: Blackwell, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Callon, Michel, ed. The Laws of the Markets. London: Blackwell, 1998.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul, and Louch, Hugh. “Socially Embedded Consumer Transactions: For What Kinds of Purchases Do People Most Often Use Networks.” American Sociological Review 63, no. 5 (1998): 619–637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobbin, Frank. The New Economic Sociology: A Reader. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnie, Douglas A. “The Role of Merchants as Prime Movers in the Expansion of the Cotton Industry: 1760–1990.” In The Fibre That Changed the World: The Cotton Industry in International Perspective, 1600–1990s, edited by Farnie, D. A. and Jeremy, David J., 15–55. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Fligstein, Neil. The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. World Agricultural Production. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 2007.Google Scholar
Geismar, Haidy. “What's in a Price? An Ethnography of Tribal Art at Auction.” Journal of Material Culture 6, no. 1 (2001): 25–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grandclément, Catherine. “Bundles of Prices: Marketing and Pricing in French Supermarkets.” Paper presented at the 4S-EASST Conference, Paris 2004.Google Scholar
Granovetter, Mark. “Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness.” The American Journal of Sociology 91, no. 3 (1985): 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muniesa, Fabian. “Performing Prices: The Case of Price Discovery Automation in the Financial Markets.” In Oekonomie and Gesellschafl, edited by Kalthoff, H., Rottenburg, R. and Wagener, H.-J.. Marburg: Metropolis, 2000.Google Scholar
North, Douglass. “Markets and Other Allocation Systems in History: The Challenge of Karl Polanyi.” Journal of European Economic History 6 (1977): 703–716.Google Scholar
özüdoğru, Tijen. Pamuk Durum ve Tahmin 2006–2007. Ankara: Tarımsal Ekonomi Araştırma Enstitüsü, 2006.Google Scholar
Polanyi, Karl. The Great Transformation. New York: Farrar & Rinehart, 1944.Google Scholar
Robinson, Joan, ed. Collected Economic Papers. 5 vols. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Marshall. Stone Age Economics. Chicago: Aldine, 1972.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet. “Peasants and Family Farms: The Position of Households in Cotton Production in a Village of Western Turkey.” Ph. D. Dissertation, University College, 1988.Google Scholar
Sirman, Nükhet, “Sosyal Bilimlerde Gelişmecilik ve Köy Çalışmaları.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 88 (2001): 32–54.Google Scholar
Toth, James. Rural Labor Movements in Egypt and Their Impact on the State, 1961–1992. Gainesville: University Press of Florida, 1999.Google Scholar
Uzzi, Brian, and Lancaster, Ryon. “Embeddedness and Price Formation in the Corporate Law Market.” American Sociological Review 69, no. 3 (2004): 319–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velthuis, Olav. Talking Prices: Symbolic Meanings of Prices on the Market for Contemporary Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
White, Harrison. “Where Do Markets Come From?” American Journal of Sociology 87, no. 3 (1981): 517–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zafirovski, Milan Z. “An Alternative Sociological Perspective on Economic Value: Price Formation as a Social Process.” International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 14, no. 2 (2000): 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zajac, Edward J, and Westphal, James D. “The Social Construction of Market Value: Institutionalization and Learning Perspectives on Stock Market Reactions.” American Sociological Review 69, no. 3 (2004): 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelizer, Viviana. Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children. New York: Basic Books, 1985.Google Scholar