No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
They Work Harder Now: Postponed Retirement in Village Turkey
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2015
Extract
In accord with a widespread belief that “modernization” brings about improvement in the quality of life, it is also sometimes assumed that in communities undergoing urbanization, industrialization, and mechanization the older generation will enjoy more leisure time than did their own parents. Whether or not this might be true generally, the reverse seems to be true for farm families in two villages in southwestern Turkey.
Thirty years ago, living in one of these villages, I was struck by a pattern that contrasted with my own experiences first as a Midwestern farmgirl and later as an urbanite in the Midwest and California. That is, parents in this village, dubbed Dutluk (Mulberry Orchard), typically enjoyed semi-retirement by the time their oldest son was in his mid-twenties. During this stage of their lives, these middle-aged and older people spent a good deal of their time in civic activities, socializing with friends, playing with the grandchildren, grooming the cows, etc. The older generation was also more likely than the younger one to perform the namaz (ritual prayer) daily. The married son(s) and daughter(s)-in-law did most of the strenuous work, although unmarried sons and daughters also did increasing amounts of work as they matured.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 1995
References
Abadan-Unat, Nermin. 1993. “Impact of External Migration on Rural Turkey,” in Stirling, (1993a), pp. 201–215.Google Scholar
Agarwal, Bina. 1984. Cold Hearths and Barren Slopes: The Woodfuel Crisis in the Third World. Maryland: The Riverdale Company, Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
Akşit, Bahattin. 1993. “Studies in Rural Transformation in Turkey 1950-1990,” in Stirling, (1993a), pp. 187–200.Google Scholar
Bartlett, ; Peggy, F. and Peter, J. Brown. 1992. “Agricultural Development and the Quality of Life”, in Podolefsky, and Brown, (1992), pp. 153–160.Google Scholar
Bernal, Victoria. 1994. “Peasants, Capitalism, and (Ir)rationality”, American Ethnologist 21, pp. 792–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bodley, John. 1990. Victims of Progress. 3rd ed. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Press.Google Scholar
Bogin, Barry. 1992. “The Extinction of Homo Sapiens”, in Podolefsky, and Brown, , pp. 32–39.Google Scholar
Boserup, Ester. 1986. Women's Role in Economic Development. Brookfield, Vermont: Gower.Google Scholar
Davis, Shelton H. 1977. Victims of the Miracle: Development and the Indians of Brazil. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Jared. 1992. “The Worst Mistake in the History of the Human Race”, in Podolefsky, and Brown, , pp. 95–98.Google Scholar
Frank, André Gunder. 1967. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
Grünhaug, Reidar. 1974. Micro-Macro Relations: Social Organization in Antalya, Southern Turkey. Department of Social Anthropology Occasional Paper No. 7. Bergen, Norway: University of Bergen Press.Google Scholar
Guha, Ramachandra. 1989. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Himalayas. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
İncirlioğlu, Emine Onaran. 1991. Gender Relations in Rural Transformation: Two Central Anatolian Villages. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.Google Scholar
İncirlioğlu, Emine Onaran. 1993. “Marriage, Gender Relations and Rural Transformation in Central Anatolia,” in Stirling, (ed.), pp. 115–125.Google Scholar
İsvan, Nilüfer. 1994. “Demographic Structure and Labor Use Patterns in Rural Turkish Households during the 1960s,” (Abstracts of Papers, MESA, 1993) Turkish Studies Association Bulletin. 18, pp. 74–77.Google Scholar
Johnson, Allen. 1992. “In Search of the Affluent Society”, in Podolefsky, and Brown, , pp. 171–178.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. 1993. “The Genesis of Petty Commodity Production in Agriculture: The Case of Turkey,” in Stirling, (ed.), pp. 171–186.Google Scholar
Leacock, Eleanor Burke and Safa, Helen, eds. 1986. Women's Work: Development and the Division of Labor. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
Morvaridi, Behrooz. 1993. “Gender and Household Management in Agriculture,” in Stirling, (ed.), pp. 80–94.Google Scholar
Olson, Emelie. 1982. “Duofocal Family Structure and an Alternative Model of Husband-Wife Relationships,” in Kağıtçıbaşı, Çiğdem (ed.), Sex Roles, Family, and Community in Turkey. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Turkish Studies, pp. 33–72.Google Scholar
Podolefsky, Aaron and Brown, Peter J. (eds.). 1992. Applying Anthropology: An Introductory Reader. 2nd ed. Mountain View, California: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. 1989. Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Schiffauer, Werner. 1993. “Peasants Without Pride: Migration, Domestic Cycle and Perception of Time,” in Stirling, (ed.), pp. 65–79.Google Scholar
Stirling, Paul (ed). 1993a. Culture and Economy: Changes in Turkish Villages. Cambridgeshire, England: Eothen Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Paul. 1993b. “Introduction: Growth and Changes,” in Stirling, (ed.), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
Timur, Serim. 1972. Türkiye’de Aile Yapısı (Family Structure in Turkey). Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Nüfus Etüdleri Enstitüsü Yayınları No. 15.Google Scholar