No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Using the “proper one”: language ideology in the context of Kemalism and neo-Ottomanism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 April 2024
Abstract
Düzgün Türkçe (proper Turkish) is an expression used to refer to well-formed linguistic structures and orthography. On Twitter, where the digital language is visible, language users, by employing the expression, comment on others’ spelling styles about what is “true” or “false.” In the context of Turkey’s ongoing conflict on the use of Latin scripts after Justice and Development Party (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi; AKP) policymakers’ voices over the alphabet, I argue that the expression has gained social meanings associated with two diametrically opposing ideologies: Kemalism and neo-Ottomanism. Further, I also assert that there is a semiotic contrast between these two ideologies in the context of orthography. Thus, by being aware of this contrast and operating on the semiotic resources available to them, language users deploy their language ideologies. Drawing on interactional data on Twitter, this study brings an understanding of the process of how language users deploy their language ideologies by commenting on others’ spelling styles. In explaining the outworkings of this process, the study builds on the concept of indexical order.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of New Perspectives on Turkey
References
Aydıngün, A and Aydıngün, İ (2004) The role of language in the formation of Turkish national identity and Turkishness. Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 10(3), 415–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aytürk, İ (2008) The first episode of language reform in Republican Turkey: The Language Council from 1926 to 1931. Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society 18(3), 275–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayyurt, Y (2010) A sociolinguistic profile of Turkey, Northern Cyprus and other Turkic states in Central Asia. In Ball, MJ (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics around the World. London and New York: Routledge, 117–126.Google Scholar
Bingöl, Y (2002) Revisiting Turkish Language Policy in Light of the Actors’ Norms and Identity Model. PhD Dissertation, Department of Central Eurasian Studies, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J (2005) Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çolak, Y (2004) Language policy and official ideology in early Republican Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 40(6), 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cüceloğlu, D and Slobin, DI (1980) Effects of Turkish Language Reform on person perception. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 11(3), 297–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğançay-Aktuna, S (1995) An evaluation of the Turkish Language Reform after 60 years. Language Problems and Language Planning 19(3), 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doğançay-Aktuna, S (2004) Language planning in Turkey: yesterday and today. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 2004(165), 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Du Bois, JW (2007) The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 139–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastman, CM (1983) Language Planning: An Introduction. San Francisco, CA: Chandler and Sharp Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Erdin, B (2022) Bilal Erdoğan, ortağı olduğu şirketin adını Osmanlıca yazım şekli ile tescil ettirdi (Bilal Erdoğan had the name of the company he owns with his partner registered in Ottoman scripts). Cumhuriyet, 4 May 2022. Available at https://www.cumhuriyet.com.tr/turkiye/bilal-erdogan-ortagi-oldugu-restoran-adini-osmanlica-yazim-sekli-ile-tescil-ettirdi-1932294 (accessed 11 March 2024).Google Scholar
Ergin, M and Karakaya, Y (2017) Between neo-Ottomanism and Ottomania: navigating state-led and popular culture representations of the past. New Perspectives on Turkey 56, 33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferreira Lopes, TA (2018) Erdoğan’s postcoup Turkey: suffering from civilizational incompetence? Mediterranean Quarterly 29(3), 117–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher Onar, N (2009) Echoes of a universalism lost: rival representations of the Ottomans in today’s Turkey. Middle Eastern Studies 45(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fishman, J (1973) Language modernization and planning in comparison with other types of national modernization and planning. Language in Society 2(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S and Irvine, JT (2019) Signs of Difference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gal, S and Woolard, KA (2001) Languages and Publics: The Making of Authority. Manchester and London: St Jerome/Routledge.Google Scholar
Duvar, Gazete (2021) İYİ Partili Çıray: AKP kongrelerinin sebebi Biontech aşısı mı? (İYİ Party’s Çıray: is the reason for AKP congresses the Biontech vaccine?) Gazete Duvar, 22 March 2021. Available at https://www.gazeteduvar.com.tr/iyi-partili-ciray-akp-kongrelerinin-sebebi-biontech-asisi-mi-haber-1516826 (accessed 11 March 2024).Google Scholar
Gentry, J (2015) Package ‘twitteR’: R based Twitter client v. 1.1.9. CRAN R Project. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/twitteR/twitteR.pdf (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Gruber, H (2017) Quoting and retweeting as communicative practices in computer mediated discourse. Discourse, Context & Media 20, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hürriyet (2014) Erdoğan: İsteseler de istemeseler de Osmanlıca öğrenilecek (Erdoğan: Ottoman Turkish will be learned whether they want to or not). Hürriyet, 8 December 2014. https://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/erdogan-isteseler-de-istemeseler-de-osmanlica-ogrenilecek-27730441 (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Irvine, JT (1989) When talk isn’t cheap: language and political economy. American Ethnologist 16(2), 248–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İmer, K (2001) Türkiye’de Dil Planlaması ve Dil Devrimi. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı Yayınları.Google Scholar
İnal, K (2012) The education politics of the AKP: the collapse of public education in Turkey. In İnal, K and Akkaymak, G (eds), Neoliberal Transformation of Education in Turkey: Political and Ideological Analysis of Educational Reforms in the Age of the AKP. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakaya, Y (2020) The conquest of hearts: the central role of Ottoman nostalgia within contemporary Turkish populism. American Journal of Cultural Sociology 8, 125–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karapehlivan, F (2015) Implications of the Neoliberal Restructuring of the State–Education Relationships for the Right to Education in Turkey. PhD Dissertation, The University of Essex, Essex.Google Scholar
Karapehlivan, F (2019) Constructing a “New Turkey” through education. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 1 October 2019. Available at https://tr.boell.org/en/2019/10/01/constructing-new-turkey-through-education (accessed 25 October 2023).Google Scholar
Kaya, A (2015) Islamisation of Turkey under the AKP rule: empowering family, faith and charity. South European Society and Politics 20(1), 47–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerslake, C (1998) Ottoman Turkish. In Johanson, L and Csató, EA (eds), The Turkic Languages. London and New York: Routledge, 179–202.Google Scholar
Keyder, Ç (2017) Türkiye’de Devlet ve Sınıflar, 21st ed. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.Google Scholar
Kiesling, SF (2011) Stance in context: affect, alignment and investment in the analysis of stancetaking. Paper presented at the iMean Conference, 15 April 2011, The University of West England, Bristol.Google Scholar
Kınıkoğlu, CN (2021) Displaying the Ottoman past in an ‘old’ museum of a ‘new’ Turkey: The Topkapi Palace Museum. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 21(4), 549–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroskrity, PV (2004) Language ideologies. In Duranti, A (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 496–517.Google Scholar
Lewis, G (1999) Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippi-Green, R (2012) English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochs, E (1992) Indexing gender. In Duranti, A and Goodwin, C (eds), Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 335–358.Google Scholar
Ongur, HO (2015) Identifying Ottomanisms: the discursive evolution of Ottoman pasts in the Turkish presents. Middle Eastern Studies 51(3), 416–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ongur, HO (2020) Performing through Friday khutbas: re-instrumentalization of religion in the new Turkey. Third World Quarterly 41(3), 434–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özel Volfová, G (2016) Turkey’s Middle Eastern endeavors: discourses and practices of neo-Ottomanism under the AKP. Die Welt des Islams 56(3–4), 489–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Özgür, I (2012) Islamic Schools in Modern Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pak, S-Y (2004) Articulating the boundary between secularism and Islamism: the Imam-Hatip schools of Turkey. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(3), 324–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, CS (1932) The icon, index, and symbol. In Hartshorne, C and Wells, P (eds), The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Vol II: Elements of Logic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 156–173.Google Scholar
Peirce, CS (1955) Logic as semiotics: the theory of signs. In Buchler, J (ed.), Philosophical Writings of Peirce. New York: Dover Publications, Inc., 98–119.Google Scholar
Reed, HA (1988) Islam and education in Turkey: their roles in national development. Turkish Studies Association Bulletin 12(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M (1979) Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne PR, Hanks WF and Hofbauer CL (eds), The Elements: Parasession on Linguistic Units and Levels, April 20–21, 1979: Including Papers from the Conference on Non-Slavic Languages of the USSR. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press, 193–248.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M (1992) The uses and utility of ideology: some reflections. Pragmatics 2(3), 311–323.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M (2003) Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23(3–4), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sözcü (2020) CHP’li Emir’den bomba iddia: Corona aşısı geldi, AKP’liler aşı olmaya başladı (Shattering claim from CHP’s Emir: the corona vaccine has arrived and AKP members have started getting vaccinated). Sözcü, 9 December 2020. Available at https://www.sozcu.com.tr/2020/gundem/chpli-emirden-bomba-iddia-corona-asisi-geldi-akpliler-asi-olmaya-basladi-6160165/ (accessed 11 March 2024).Google Scholar
Strauss, J (2017) Language and power in the late Ottoman Empire. In Murphey, R (ed.), Imperial Lineages and Legacies in the Eastern Mediterranean: Recording the Imprint of Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman Rule. London and New York: Routledge, 115–142.Google Scholar
Tachau, F (1964) Language and politics: Turkish language reform. Review of Politics 26(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taşpınar, Ö (2008) Turkey’s Middle East policies: between neo-Ottomanism and Kemalism. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Available at http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep13064 (accessed 20 January 2021).Google Scholar
Türkeş, M (2016) Decomposing neo-Ottoman hegemony. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies 18(3), 191–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı (2022) Cumhurbaşkanı Erdoğan, Necip Fazıl Kısakürek’i Anma Programı’na katıldı (President Erdoğan attended the commemoration program for Necip Fazıl Kısakürek). Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı, 13 May 2022. https://www.tccb.gov.tr/haberler/410/136869/cumhurbaskani-erdogan-necip-fazil-kisakurek-i-anma-programi-na-katildi (accessed 12 March 2024).Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, T (2008) Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wastnidge, E (2019) Imperial grandeur and selective memory: re-assessing neo-Ottomanism in Turkish foreign and domestic politics. Middle Eastern Critique 28(1), 7–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodhead, C (2012) Ottoman languages. In Woodhead, C (ed.), The Ottoman World. London and New York: Routledge, 143–158.Google Scholar
Woolard, KA (2020) Language ideology. In Stanlaw, J (ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology. London: Wiley, 1–21.Google Scholar
Woolard, KA and Schieffelin, BB (1994) Language ideology. Annual Review of Anthropology 23(1), 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yağcıoğlu, S (2002) Geçmiş mi günümüz mü? Çatışma söyleminde tarihselliğin kurgulanmasında eşdizimsel örüntülerin ideolojik işlevleri. In Yağcıoğlu S (ed.), 1990 Sonrası Laik Anti-Laik Çatışmasında Farklı Söylemler: Disiplinler Arası Bir Yaklaşım. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınları, 115–143.Google Scholar
Yağcıoğlu, S (2016) ‘Yeni Türkiye’de kimlik inşasının ideolojik boyutları: Erdoğan’ın ‘veda’ konuşmasının toplumsal aktörler, eylemsel süreçler ve eğretileme açısından incelenmesi. In Büyükkantarcıoğlu N, Yarar E and Çotuksöken Y (eds), “Türkçeye Türkçe İçinden Bakan” Dilbilimci Ömer Demircan’a Armağan. Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Yayınları, 241–258.Google Scholar
Yağcıoğlu, S and Cem-Değer, A (2001) Logos or mythos: (de)legitimation strategies in confrontational discourses of sociocultural ethos. Discourse and Society 12(6), 817–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yanarocak, HEC (2022) The Evolution of Turkish School Textbooks from Atatürk to Erdogan. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Yang Erdem, C (2017) Ottomentality: neoliberal governance of culture and neo-Ottoman management of diversity. Turkish Studies 18(4), 710–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavuz, MH (2016) Social and intellectual origins of neo-Ottomanism: searching for a post-national vision. Die Welt des Islams 56(3–4), 438–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yavuz, MH (2020) Nostalgia for the Empire: The Politics of Neo-Ottomanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yılmaz, H (2011) Learning to read (again): the social experiences of Turkey’s 1928 alphabet reform. International Journal of Middle East Studies 43(4), 677–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yüce, CB (2019) Identity construction through language: the case of the Turkish Language Reform. Journal of Multicultural Society 9(2), 100–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar