Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T23:10:04.467Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Left Populism to Conservative Republicanism: Left Kemalists' Regression from Modernist Optimism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2015

Yüksel Taşkın
Yüksel Taşkın*
Affiliation:
Marmara University, Political Science and International Relations Department, Göztepe, 34722, Kadıköy, İstanbul, ytaskin@marmara.edu.tr.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When multi-party politics was initiated in Turkey in 1946, rival interpretations of Kemalism emerged to confront the challenge posed by the center-right's surmounting electoral victories. While the left-populist interpretation led by Ecevit gained considerable momentum, there was also a parallel yet less visible formation of a reaction against it—namely, conservative republicanism. From the mid-1960s onwards, left populists and conservative republicans waged a serious political rivalry which temporarily foreshadowed the important similarities they shared due to the legacy of Kemalism. Following the failure of left populism in the late 1970s, these similarities gradually resurfaced and the left populists have withdrawn to the reactionary position of conservative republicanism which fits the language of frustrated elites.

Keywords

left populismconservative republicanismBülent EcevitKemalismsocial democracy in Turkey
Type
Articles
Information
New Perspectives on Turkey , Volume 37 , Fall 2007 , pp. 177 - 201
Copyright
Copyright © New Perspectives on Turkey 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akar, Atilla. Öteki DSP: Ecevitlerin Gayrı Resmi Öyküsü, İstanbul: Metis, 2001.Google Scholar
Alper, Emin. “An Indigenous Social Democracy: The Democratic Left Thought in Turkish Politics (1972–1975).” M.A. thesis, Boğaziçi University, 2004.Google Scholar
Bayar, Celal. Başvekilim Adnan Menderes. Edited by Bozdağ, İsmet. İstanbul: Baha Matbaası, 1969.Google Scholar
Bila, Fikret. Phoenix: Ecevit'in Yeniden Doğuşu, İstanbul: Doğan Kitap, 2001.Google Scholar
Bila, Hikmet. CHP: 1919–1999. İstanbul: Doğan Kitap, 1999.Google Scholar
Bora, Tanil, and Taşkın, Yüksel. “Sağ Kemalizm.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Kemalizm, edited by Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat, 529–555. İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
Bozarslan, Hamit. “Bülent Ecevit.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Kemalizm, 458–463. İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
“Bülent Ecevit'le Mülakat.” Tercüman, 11 July 1986.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Bülent. Atatürk ve Devrimcilik. Ankara: Tekin Yayınevi, 1970.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Bülent, “Aydın ve Halk.” Özgür insan, no. 2 (1972): 5–8.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Bülent, Bu Düzen Değişmelidir. İstanbul: Tekin Yayınevi, 1974.Google Scholar
Ecevit, Bülent, Ortanın Solu. İstanbul: Kim Yayınları, 1966.Google Scholar
Erdoğan, Necmi. “Demokratik Soldan Devrimci Yol'a: 1970'lerde Sol Popülizm Üzerine Notlar.” Toplum ve Bilim, no. 78 (1998): 22–37.Google Scholar
Evren, Kenan. Kenan Evren'in Anıları. Vol. 2. İstanbul: Milliyet Yayınları, 1991.Google Scholar
Feyzioğlu, Turhan. “Atatürk ve Milliyetçilik.” Atatürk Araştırmaları Merkezi Dergisi, no. 2 (1985): 353–418.Google Scholar
Gökalp, Ziya. Türkçülüğün Esasları. Edited by Kaplan, Mehmet. Ankara: Kültür Bakanlığı, 1976.Google Scholar
Gülöksüz, Yiğit. “Köykent Önerisi Üzerine Düşünceler.” Özgür İnsan, no. 19 (1974): 31.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. A Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by McCharthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar. Türkiye'de Devlet ve Sınıflar, İstanbul: İletişim, 1993.Google Scholar
Keyder, Çağlar, Ulusal Kalkınmacılığın İflası, İstanbul: Metis, 1996.Google Scholar
Kırca, Coşkun. CHP Sosyalist Bir Parti midir? Ankara: Balkanoğlu Matbaası, 1967.Google Scholar
Kırca, Coşkun, and Başer Kafaoğlu, Arslan. “Rejim ve Anayasamızda Reform Önerisi.” Yeni Forum, 15 May 1980.Google Scholar
Koloğlu, Orhan. Kim Bu Ecevit? İstanbul: Boyut Kitapları, 2001.Google Scholar
Laclau, Ernest, İdeoloji ve Politika, İstanbul: Belge Yayınları, 1998.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gerhard. “Consociational Democracy, Class Conflict and the New Corporatism.” In Trends Toward Corporatist Intermediation, edited by Schmitter, Philippe C. and Lehmbruch, Gerhard. London: SAGE, 1979.Google Scholar
Okyar, Osman. “1960'larda İktisat Politikalarının Oluşmasında Forum'un öncü Rolü-Sistem Devamlılığı ve İktisadi Politika IV.” Yeni Forum, 15 January 1984, 5–11.Google Scholar
Özdalga, Haluk. Kötü Yönetilen Türkiye: Örnek Vaka DSP. İstanbul: Kitap Yayınevi, 2005.Google Scholar
Özdemir, Hikmet. Yön Hareketi: Kalkınmada Bir Strateji Arayışı. Ankara: Bilgi Yayınevi, 1986.Google Scholar
Parkin, Frank. Marxism and Class Theory: A Bourgeois Critique. New York: Columbia University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha. Atatürk'ün Nutuk'u. Vol. 1, Türkiye'de Siyasal Kültürün Resmi Kaynakları, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1993.Google Scholar
Parla, Taha, The Social and Political Thought of Ziya Gökalp, 1876–1924. Leiden: Brill, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parla, Taha, and Davison, Andrew. Corporatist Ideology in Kemalist Turkey. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Simav, Akın. Turan Güneş'in Siyasi Kavgaları, İzmir: İstiklal Matbaası, 1975.Google Scholar
Tanör, Bülent, İki Anayasa: 1961–1982. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları, 1986.Google Scholar
Taşkın, Yüksel. “Coşkun Kırca.” In Modern Türkiye'de Siyasi Düşünce: Kemalizm, edited by Bora, Tanıl and Gültekingil, Murat, 574–577. İstanbul: İletişim, 2001.Google Scholar
Taşkın, Yüksel, “Türkiye Sağı'nı Anlamak: Soğuk Savaş ve Sonrası İçin Bir İzah Denemesi.” In İktisat, Siyaset, Devlet Üzerine Yazılar: Kemali Saybaşılı'ya Armağan, edited by Ülman, Burak and Akça, İsmet, 337–353. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayınları, 2006.Google Scholar
Ünsal, Artun. Umuttan Yalnızlığa: Türkiye İşçi Partisi, 1961–1971. İstanbul: Tarih Vakfı, 2002.Google Scholar